Loaded Chicken Sandwich Posted May 28, 2023 Posted May 28, 2023 1 hour ago, RaceToTheTop said: Every team you mentioned was taller than the one I mentioned…..and oladipo wasnt 6’4”. Texas would be starting 6-0, 6-1, 6-4. And Oladipo is literally listed at 6-4 on the Heats roster on their website. He has shrunk since college. Indiana just fudged the numbers, the NBA isn't allowed to lie about heights. AkronHoosier 1 Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted May 29, 2023 Posted May 29, 2023 3 hours ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said: Texas would be starting 6-0, 6-1, 6-4. And Oladipo is literally listed at 6-4 on the Heats roster on their website. He has shrunk since college. Indiana just fudged the numbers, the NBA isn't allowed to lie about heights. Tyrese Hunter: 6'0". https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/player/_/id/4683751/tyrese-hunter Max Abmas: 6'0" https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/player/_/id/4432932/max-abmas Caleb Love: 6'4" https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/player/_/id/4433144/caleb-love We'll see what each of them are listed should they ever reach the NBA. Teams can play three guards, but playing two six nothing guards and a six four guard alongside them who isn't a good rebounder isn't ideal IMO. You're giving up a lot in rebounding to do so and defensively they are getting forced into undersized situations. And offensively I don't see a whole lot of complimenting each other. Love wants the ball in his hands, Abams is best with the ball in his hands, and Hunter played at Iowa State as their point guard and primary ball handler before he moved off the ball last year because of Marcus Carr. Just my opinion -- you can't certainly play three guards but it is not ideal when two of them are six foot. It wasn't ideal with Indiana when they were #1, but having two players who are the second and fourth picks in the upcoming NBA draft certainly overcomes that. Oladipo was a plus rebounder for a guard (6.3 reb in 28 mpg his junior year). And from Caleb Love's standpoint -- who has pretty much said he wants to be the guy running the offense -- I certainly don't see it as ideal. lillurk 1 Quote
lillurk Posted May 29, 2023 Posted May 29, 2023 The short answer re: height is it’s hard (not impossible) to have a good defense at a size disadvantage. Easy to shoot over, easy to capitalize against switches, tough to rebound. I love a 3 or even 4 guard lineup as a change-of-pace look, but it’s tough to do at the high-major level constantly. The last time I was accused of height obsession it was in the context of Woody’s recruiting. But making that about me, or any other poster, is a category error: Woody’s stated and revealed preference through his entire coaching career is for plus positional size/length. Tom White and RaceToTheTop 2 Quote
IUFAN1976 Posted May 30, 2023 Posted May 30, 2023 40 minutes ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said: Thank god he’s not at IU!!! Hardwood83 1 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted May 30, 2023 Posted May 30, 2023 8 minutes ago, IUFAN1976 said: Thank god he’s not at IU!!! I agree although, on paper that Arizona roster looks formidable. They will be top 10 preseason maybe even top 5. Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted May 31, 2023 Posted May 31, 2023 FWIW, at the minimum it will test Jeff Goodman's love affair with Tommy Lloyd. BTW, in a twist of fate Arizona plays at Duke this year. Quote
Popular Post Stuhoo Posted June 6, 2023 Popular Post Posted June 6, 2023 Here's a moderately hot nugget of info from today's Hoosier Hysterics podcast: Hysteric Eric stated in no uncertain terms that Caleb Love was not considered because he was not going to be academically admitted to IU. So apparently it's not a Michigan problem; it's a Caleb Love problem. Props to IU for not creating the mess that Michigan did with this one. bigrod, ALASKA HOOSIER, Demo and 6 others 7 2 Quote
Hoosierfan2017 Posted June 6, 2023 Posted June 6, 2023 Most have major academic issues if he wasn’t going to be admitted to IU. ALASKA HOOSIER 1 Quote
Alford Bailey Posted June 6, 2023 Posted June 6, 2023 1 hour ago, Stuhoo said: Here's a moderately hot nugget of info from today's Hoosier Hysterics podcast: Hysteric Eric stated in no uncertain terms that Caleb Love was not considered because he was not going to be academically admitted to IU. So apparently it's not a Michigan problem; it's a Caleb Love problem. Props to IU for not creating the mess that Michigan did with this one. Or maybe a North Carolina problem too HoosierDYT, lillurk, J34 and 2 others 5 Quote
Honkyman Posted June 7, 2023 Posted June 7, 2023 6 hours ago, Stuhoo said: So apparently it's not a Michigan problem; it's a Caleb Love problem. Props to IU for not creating the mess that Michigan did with this one. I was torched on this board when I said exactly this after Love decommitted from Michigan and some thought IU was recruiting him. Quote
lillurk Posted June 7, 2023 Posted June 7, 2023 6 hours ago, Stuhoo said: So apparently it's not a Michigan problem; it's a Caleb Love problem. Props to IU for not creating the mess that Michigan did with this one. This is where Juwan and staff deserve some criticism: IU knew this before he was even linked to UM, then it took weeks after his commitment for he and UM to split? And UM deservedly has a reputation as a tough spot for transfers. All the more reason it was misplayed. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.