Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

Not to be the turd in the punch bowl, but for Xavier Johnson to have not played in more than 30% of our games, we will need to play 37 games. We are guaranteed to play 33 games.

I was going to say the same. They can grant a waiver if it’s over 30% if they want, though, and it’ll be close.

Posted

Looking past my complete lack of math skills, I wonder how they calculate the game in which you got hurt. The NCAA counting X playing in either 11 or 10 games makes a pretty big difference when figuring how many postseason games we need to play for him to have played 30% of our season. 

Posted
Just now, Hovadipo said:

Looking past my complete lack of math skills, I wonder how they calculate the game in which you got hurt. The NCAA counting X playing in either 11 or 10 games makes a pretty big difference when figuring how many postseason games we need to play for him to have played 30% of our season. 

Pretty simple for me; he played in 11.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hovadipo said:

Looking past my complete lack of math skills, I wonder how they calculate the game in which you got hurt. The NCAA counting X playing in either 11 or 10 games makes a pretty big difference when figuring how many postseason games we need to play for him to have played 30% of our season. 

That's a good question. They probably count that game.

The other criterion he'll have met pretty easily which is that the injury must happen in the first 50% of the season., Iirc or maybe it's before a certain date which is like late December or early January.

Only the number of games played makes me think it might not be granted. 

Posted

“However, for purposes of this regulation, the calculation of scheduled contests or dates of competition in a particular season does not include postseason competition conducted subsequent to the completion of the institution's regular-season schedule and conference tournament.“

 

If I’m reading that right, nothing beyond the BTT counts, meaning he’s probably not getting below the 30% threshold. Too many bylaws for me, my head hurts so I’m bowing out. Someone pick up the tab for HoosierHoopster to dive into the NCAA bylaws and figure this out for us. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, go iu bb said:

That's a good question. They probably count that game.

The other criterion he'll have met pretty easily which is that the injury must happen in the first 50% of the season., Iirc or maybe it's before a certain date which is like late December or early January.

Only the number of games played makes me think it might not be granted. 

By rule they will definitely count that game. But if he played in 11 of 36 that’d be 30.5% and I’d imagine a waiver would be reasonably likely 

Posted
Just now, Hovadipo said:

“However, for purposes of this regulation, the calculation of scheduled contests or dates of competition in a particular season does not include postseason competition conducted subsequent to the completion of the institution's regular-season schedule and conference tournament.“

 

If I’m reading that right, nothing beyond the BTT counts, meaning he’s probably not getting below the 30% threshold. Too many bylaws for me, my head hurts so I’m bowing out. Someone pick up the tab for HoosierHoopster to dive into the NCAA bylaws and figure this out for us. 

Well then he’s not getting below 30%.

Paging Chris Reynolds!

Posted

To make this decision when they could still use X this season, I imagine IU feels like they have some reasonable reassurance that X will get the waiver. A lot of behind the scenes conversations happen in these instances--not saying guarantees were made, but some indication X is in good shape to receive the waiver. 

Posted
20 minutes ago, LamarCheeks said:

If he were going for a fifth year, I'd feel optimistic. But it just feels like someone going for a sixth year will be easier to deny. 

I think there was a player playing in his 7th college season this year. It might have been on football but there is cases that shows you can get those extra years 

Posted

Would obviously be a major and much needed pick up for next year's roster. If we can pick up 2 portal bigs and a wing/shooter, we can be competitive again. But we're going to really miss TJD, Race, Kopp... so would be great to have XJ leading in the backcourt 

Posted

We are really thin in the front court at the moment. Woodson will need to land some major talent in the portal for this roster to be top 5 in the B10, but I don't think it's unlikely. If Bates and Geronimo to take a few steps forward over the offseason, we could be dark horses IMO. Would like to see us pick up some guys who are 6'10"+ for once.  

  • PG: XJ // Gunn // Gabe Cupps
  • SG: Trey // Bates // Jakai
  • SF: Portal player // Geronimo // Banks
  • PF: Reneau // Geronimo
  • C: Portal player // Portal player 
Posted
22 minutes ago, TeeterInNJ said:

We are really thin in the front court at the moment. Woodson will need to land some major talent in the portal for this roster to be top 5 in the B10, but I don't think it's unlikely. If Bates and Geronimo to take a few steps forward over the offseason, we could be dark horses IMO. Would like to see us pick up some guys who are 6'10"+ for once.  

  • PG: XJ // Gunn // Gabe Cupps
  • SG: Trey // Bates // Jakai
  • SF: Portal player // Geronimo // Banks
  • PF: Reneau // Geronimo
  • C: Portal player // Portal player 

I think Banks will be a lot higher in the rotation next year. I could see him if he improves a lot being the starting 4 with Reneau at the 5

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...