Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

BottomLine

Be careful what you wish for

Recommended Posts

After today's sad showing against Maryland the mob is ready to hang Archie Miller in effigy or perhaps in reality.  For those that thought we were going to get the second coming of Robert Montgomery Knight, a disciplinarian coach that put defense first, you were wrong.  That recipe for success was gone long before The General was booted out of Bloomington.  We all remember the glory days of the late 70's and 80's when Indiana was a force to be dealt with every year.  Some of us remember the days of Branch MacCracken, also a pretty good coach with two national titles.  With MacCracken it was the "Hurryin' Hoosiers" and a lot of the alumni didn't take kindly when a "mid Major" coach was brought in from Army to sit on the ball and teach defense.  The formula worked fine for awhile.  Knight would go to a 4-corner offense with eight minutes to go and a four point lead and the other team would have to foul to get the ball back.  Knight teams would have the discipline to make 20 passed before the prefect shot came up with the ball in the hands of the right man.  Knight's teams would run their motion offense and pick and screen until the defense collapsed from exhaustion.  But times change and Knight's teams were never the same after the introduction of the shot clock and his famous help side man-to-man defense was never as good after the introduction of the 3-point shot.  By the time Knight left town a lot of basketball had passed him by.  His basketball philosophy wasn't working as well and his personality was driving away a lot of top recruits.

I mention all of this because the cult of Bobby is starting to rear its head again, because Archie Miller isn't matching up with expectations.  How dare he not be Bobby Knight!  Be careful what you wish for.  Knight's last national title was in 1987 and IU made the Final Four just one more time in has last 13 years at IU.  In his last 9 years IU never made the Final Four once.  Only two of his last six teams were ranked in the top 25 in the final poll of the regular season.  Obviously the glory days for IU basketball had ended long before Coach finally moved on.  Or should I say that basketball moved on and left Knight behind.  Still this was the formula that many IU faithful wanted to return to three years ago when Archie Miller was hired.  So far it hasn't worked.  Now a lot of fans are starting to question if it ever will.

So let the debate continue.  I'm guessing that with a new AD coming in, Archie Miller will probably have one more year to show what he can do before the axe falls, unless there is another complete collapse this year like last.  And, that my friends, is certainly within the bounds of possibility.

For the sake of comparison, here are the win percentages of out last five coaches:

Sampson  .708  (Includes the 3-4 under Dakich)

Knight   .647   (Last 6 years only)

Crean   .628   (Pitched the first two years because of the complete rebuild after Sampson)

Davis    .593    (6 years)

Miller    .574    (2+ years)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BottomLine said:

After today's sad showing against Maryland the mob is ready to hang Archie Miller in effigy or perhaps in reality.  For those that thought we were going to get the second coming of Robert Montgomery Knight, a disciplinarian coach that put defense first, you were wrong.  That recipe for success was gone long before The General was booted out of Bloomington.  We all remember the glory days of the late 70's and 80's when Indiana was a force to be dealt with every year.  Some of us remember the days of Branch MacCracken, also a pretty good coach with two national titles.  With MacCracken it was the "Hurryin' Hoosiers" and a lot of the alumni didn't take kindly when a "mid Major" coach was brought in from Army to sit on the ball and teach defense.  The formula worked fine for awhile.  Knight would go to a 4-corner offense with eight minutes to go and a four point lead and the other team would have to foul to get the ball back.  Knight teams would have the discipline to make 20 passed before the prefect shot came up with the ball in the hands of the right man.  Knight's teams would run their motion offense and pick and screen until the defense collapsed from exhaustion.  But times change and Knight's teams were never the same after the introduction of the shot clock and his famous help side man-to-man defense was never as good after the introduction of the 3-point shot.  By the time Knight left town a lot of basketball had passed him by.  His basketball philosophy wasn't working as well and his personality was driving away a lot of top recruits.

I mention all of this because the cult of Bobby is starting to rear its head again, because Archie Miller isn't matching up with expectations.  How dare he not be Bobby Knight!  Be careful what you wish for.  Knight's last national title was in 1987 and IU made the Final Four just one more time in has last 13 years at IU.  In his last 9 years IU never made the Final Four once.  Only two of his last six teams were ranked in the top 25 in the final poll of the regular season.  Obviously the glory days for IU basketball had ended long before Coach finally moved on.  Or should I say that basketball moved on and left Knight behind.  Still this was the formula that many IU faithful wanted to return to three years ago when Archie Miller was hired.  So far it hasn't worked.  Now a lot of fans are starting to question if it ever will.

So let the debate continue.  I'm guessing that with a new AD coming in, Archie Miller will probably have one more year to show what he can do before the axe falls, unless there is another complete collapse this year like last.  And, that my friends, is certainly within the bounds of possibility.

For the sake of comparison, here are the win percentages of out last five coaches:

Sampson  .708  (Includes the 3-4 under Dakish)

Knight   .647   (Last 6 years only)

Crean   .628   (Pitched the first two years because of the complete rebuild after Sampson)

Davis    .593    (6 years)

Miller    .574    (2+ years)

Crazy we fired a guy for phone calls now after seeing LSU and UNC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, JSHoosier said:

People being upset with Miller isn't because of Bob Knight.  It's because the same players are making the same mistakes and they're not being held accountable.  It's because we're 3 years in with no shooters and none coming in.  It's because last year the team thought effort was optional, and tonight we saw them quit.  It's because we see problems that aren't being addressed.  All of those will prevent winning games.  He'd be on thin ice at pUKe or Duke or UNC right now, but we're told we have to wait 5 years to even know what he is.

We keep being told to be patient it took Bennett and Beilein time to build their programs but both made the tourney in their first 3 years with far fewer resources. 
 

We will have paid 500,000 so far for each Big Ten win. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Brass Cannon said:

We keep being told to be patient it took Bennett and Beilein time to build their programs but both made the tourney in their first 3 years with far fewer resources. 
 

We will have paid 500,000 so far for each Big Ten win. 

So, I think it is a foregone conclusion that you think he should be gone.  I understand your point and I'm leaning that way myself.  The question then becomes where do we go from here.  To try to repeat the success of the past is an admirable goal.  To try and repeat the methods of the past may be a mistake.  IU hired Miller because they thought he was a Knight clone and success would automatically follow.  He isn't and it didn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BottomLine said:

So, I think it is a foregone conclusion that you think he should be gone.  I understand your point and I'm leaning that way myself.  The question then becomes where do we go from here.  To try to repeat the success of the past is an admirable goal.  To try and repeat the methods of the past may be a mistake.  IU hired Miller because they thought he was a Knight clone and success would automatically follow.  He isn't and it didn't.

If we aren’t willing to cheat we need somebody who can develop players. Like Bennett and Bo Ryan. 
 

Personally I could care less if we started sending fed ex packages. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Brass Cannon said:

If we aren’t willing to cheat we need somebody who can develop players. Like Bennett and Bo Ryan. 
 

Personally I could care less if we started sending fed ex packages. 

Last time I looked Bennett and Ryan were not available.  Do you have any way of prediction who the next Bennett or Ryan might be?  IU got lucky once and picked a young coach out of obscurity and it worked out.  Beginners luck I think and the draw that a destination program has.  "Because its Indiana!"  As much as I hate to admit it, Crean was better than Miller, but he wasn't the answer either.  If we are going to change coaches down the road, we should be looking now and not after panic mode hits after we drop the axe.

We disagree on the fed ex packages.  Being clean is a backbone of the program.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BottomLine said:

Last time I looked Bennett and Ryan were not available.  Do you have any way of prediction who the next Bennett or Ryan might be?  IU got lucky once and picked a young coach out of obscurity and it worked out.  Beginners luck I think and the draw that a destination program has.  "Because its Indiana!"  As much as I hate to admit it, Crean was better than Miller, but he wasn't the answer either.  If we are going to change coaches down the road, we should be looking now and not after panic mode hits after we drop the axe.

We disagree on the fed ex packages.  Being clean is a backbone of the program.

I don’t know who the best developers of talent are. Need to do id them 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally dont want Alford, as he was the coach brought up around the same time as Archie. Holtmann didn't want the job before, so that's out. I wouldnt be opposed to dane fife. I'm not sure they would get Chris beard but it would be worth a shot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I personally dont want Alford, as he was the coach brought up around the same time as Archie. Holtmann didn't want the job before, so that's out. I wouldnt be opposed to dane fife. I'm not sure they would get Chris beard but it would be worth a shot. 

If Archie does not work then IU needs to go after a guy like Beard. Not some mid-major maybe but someone who has had sustained success. Even Beard has not had sustained success at the big time level but he seems to be that guy.

IU would need to bring in someone who will win. If that means $ then do it. They likely won’t and will try to find success with someone who had success at the lower level and hope that translates. It might but each time the miss they lose more and more of that fan base and donor money.

Alabama eventually brought in Saban. They tried the hot prospect route for a long time but eventually went after a proven coach. We don’t have the same level support ($) that Bama football has so we have more at risk when we miss.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, 8bucks said:


If Archie does not work then IU needs to go after a guy like Beard. Not some mid-major maybe but someone who has had sustained success. Even Beard has not had sustained success at the big time level but he seems to be that guy.

IU would need to bring in someone who will win. If that means $ then do it. They likely won’t and will try to find success with someone who had success at the lower level and hope that translates. It might but each time the miss they lose more and more of that fan base and donor money.

Alabama eventually brought in Saban. They tried the hot prospect route for a long time but eventually went after a proven coach. We don’t have the same level support ($) that Bama football has so we have more at risk when we miss.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Yeah they should definitely go after beard... IU pays pretty well and would be a definite upgrade for pretty much any mid major coach. The question is though: who do they get if Chris beard says thanks but no thanks? Stevens and Donovan I dont think are walking through that door. 

Bruce Pearl has coached at two schools recently that are football schools, with basketball as the secondary. And I'm not sure indiana would want a bruce pearl, sampson, pitino etc to try to keep a squeaky clean image. 

There are a lot of posters that seem to want miller fired before the plane lands. I am as frustrated as everybody else, but who would we hire that would make it worth the buyout? 

Lastly, last time I checked, Fred glass is still here...do we actually want another coaching search done by the same people who did the last one. I think waiting on the new AD to pull the trigger makes much more sense. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah they should definitely go after beard... IU pays pretty well and would be a definite upgrade for pretty much any mid major coach. The question is though: who do they get if Chris beard says thanks but no thanks? Stevens and Donovan I dont think are walking through that door.  Bruce Pearl has coached at two schools recently that are football schools, with basketball as the secondary. And I'm not sure indiana would want a bruce pearl, sampson, pitino etc to try to keep a squeaky clean image. 

There are a lot of posters that seem to want miller fired before the plane lands. I am as frustrated as everybody else, but who would we hire that would make it worth the buyout? 

Lastly, last time I checked, Fred glass is still here...do we actually want another coaching search done by the same people who did the last one. I think waiting on the new AD to pull the trigger makes much more sense. 

 

I haven’t seen anyone call for a mid-season change but if the administration isn’t looking for the next basketball coach they aren’t doing their jobs.

 

That has to be a discussion that is happening behind the scenes. If this coach doesn’t make the tourney of 68 in year 3 after missing it in year 1 and 2 they have to be lining up buyout options and new coach options.

 

68 teams, that is a huge number of teams and we are nearing 3 years, really 5 in a row of not being a top 68 team.

 

That’s unfathomable

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The litany re Bob Knight just shows that the game changes.  Rule changes bring more competition and parity.  For the most part, Bobby adapted.  If Henderson doesn't blow out his knee, we probably have a better showing in 1992.  The 2002 appearance was essentially a Knight team.   

The problem with Archie is he doesn't adapt.  Offense sucks, so make a frigging change.  The failure to adapt kills mos coaches careers.  Archie needs to adapt now.  If he doesn't he should be gone. 

They need to get a new AD now.  No reason to wait on Glass to clean out his office. Things need to change and he's a lame duck.   If firing Archie is the first thing the new guy does then so be it.  Who's next. At this point almost anyone would be an upgrade.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wish Belien was younger.




Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

I had actually thought about this the other day. Heck, maybe he’ll tire of the NBA and return to college in a few years. He might not have many years left but I wouldn’t mind him “rebuilding a culture” here before handing it off to a successor.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, HoosierAloha said:


I had actually thought about this the other day. Heck, maybe he’ll tire of the NBA and return to college in a few years. He might not have many years left but I wouldn’t mind him “rebuilding a culture” here before handing it off to a successor.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Hell just pay him for a recommendation at this point

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×