Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Cheaney40

Juwan Morgan RETURNING For Senior Season

Recommended Posts

Agreed. I’ve just been hearing that he is definitely gone from decent sources but I don’t think that is necessarily logical. I just wanted to clear up a little of a misconception on this board, he is not 95% returning. 

HoosierDYT, were the comments recent from your sources? Or at the beginning of the year about Juwan leaving


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, dallas44~ said:


Also this comment baffles me. Cuz he was nowhere near nba prospect last year


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Someone may have "popped off" that he was gone because we fired Crean or something.  We look at it as though Archie sold only Hartman, Smith, Durham and Moore on sticking with Indiana, but he may have had to sell more players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our recruiting does not act like he is going anywhere. If we pushed hard for a grad big after he announced I would be more concerned. By all accounts I have heard him and Archie are close. I doubt Archie is that far in the blue.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Our recruiting does not act like he is going anywhere. If we pushed hard for a grad big after he announced I would be more concerned. By all accounts I have hear him and Archie are close. I doubt Archie is that far in the blue.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

^^Bingo^^



Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming things to be factual when they are many possible outcomes is either arrogance or ignorance. I think Juwan is more likely than not to come back, but the G League is stepping up its offerings and I’m not ruling out a few NBA teams having a unique interest in him.


Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Walking Boot of Doom said:

Assuming things to be factual when they are many possible outcomes is either arrogance or ignorance. I think Juwan is more likely than not to come back, but the G League is stepping up its offerings and I’m not ruling out a few NBA teams having a unique interest in him.


Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando BtownBanners

Yes the G-League now offers a salary that allows them to compete with professional NBA 2K leagues for athletes. Both pay $35k/year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes the G-League now offers a salary that allows them to compete with professional NBA 2K leagues for athletes. Both pay $35k/year.

Your point is understood, but that’s not a fully accurate view of what a G League/fringe NBA can earn while working towards their dream.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Show companies aren’t killing themselves to pay undrafted G-League guys though. In some cases their deal might just be free gear/shoes. 

True but OAD players who may not want to go to college might look at the G League + shoe money and go that route.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe wrong topic but it’ll fit.

Without injuries or redshirts, 13 scholarships is too many to manage in my opinion.

The best teams normally play 8 guys the bulk of the minutes then maybe up to 10 getting some play.

That leaves 3-5 scholarship players not getting much time. In today’s age, with early contributions from Freshman, it is nearly impossible to have 13 rostered players and all of them happy.

My thinking, the way Archie is recruiting, spots 6-13 will soon be subtle talent differences. It will be difficult to determine minutes and PT without people being unhappy. I suppose that is when you start seeing transfer numbers rise.

It’s a tough job, I don’t know how you really manage it. I suppose if injuries happen or players leave early it creates more opportunity. I could see this becoming a major discussion point over the next few years.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Maybe wrong topic but it’ll fit.

Without injuries or redshirts, 13 scholarships is too many to manage in my opinion.

The best teams normally play 8 guys the bulk of the minutes then maybe up to 10 getting some play.

That leaves 3-5 scholarship players not getting much time. In today’s age, with early contributions from Freshman, it is nearly impossible to have 13 rostered players and all of them happy.

My thinking, the way Archie is recruiting, spots 6-13 will soon be subtle talent differences. It will be difficult to determine minutes and PT without people being unhappy. I suppose that is when you start seeing transfer numbers rise.

It’s a tough job, I don’t know how you really manage it. I suppose if injuries happen or players leave early it creates more opportunity. I could see this becoming a major discussion point over the next few years.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Completely agree. The quality of the players being recruited can all play major minutes at big time programs. Some are not going to get the minutes they expect and will likely move on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Maybe wrong topic but it’ll fit.

Without injuries or redshirts, 13 scholarships is too many to manage in my opinion.

The best teams normally play 8 guys the bulk of the minutes then maybe up to 10 getting some play.

That leaves 3-5 scholarship players not getting much time. In today’s age, with early contributions from Freshman, it is nearly impossible to have 13 rostered players and all of them happy.
Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Timely comment.  Just within the last week or two, one of the coaches of a D1 women's program made that very statement and advocated for a reduction to 10 for the very reasons you cited.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×