Stuhoo Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 With ALL of the attention being paid to the decision of young Mr. Langford, I am curious as to opinions of which lineup would likely produce more wins and accomplishments next season: A Rob Phinisee Romeo Langford (Top ten freshman recruit, 6'5", 200) Justin Smith Juwan Morgan DeRon Davis/Race Thompson or B Rob Phinisee Ryan Taylor (Senior grad transfer, 6'5", 200, last year at Eville: 21ppg, 42% 3pt, 86% ft) Justin Smith Juwan Morgan DeRon Davis/Race Thompson OH...and the ground rules for your answers: No lineup substitutions beyond what I listed (ie; - yes, I know that others like Devonte, McBob, Jerome might start, but that's not for this discussion). Not looking at effect on future recruiting; STRICTLY 2018-19 season wins, losses, and ceiling for team accomplishment. DISCUSS! Hutch89 1 Quote
cleeter Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 (edited) I'd take option A. I feel RP will be great at getting Romeo the ball. And when teams try to double Romeo, then RP is well enough to score himself, along with the deadly combo and Juwan and Romeo could cause with P&R's...I can picture Juwan setting a screen, the defense staying with Romeo who then passes to the open Juwan, defense collapses on Juwan by the basket and he lays it off to a cutting Justin Smith for a big slam. Or romeo just pops a three and bang haha Edited March 16, 2018 by cleeter HoosierAloha and ALASKA HOOSIER 2 Quote
rebelcc Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 I don't know if I can provide an answer but I know both lineups look golden to me. I have open arms for either. cleeter, ALASKA HOOSIER, mamasa and 1 other 4 Quote
Str8Hoosiers Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Whojainjawja said: Give me the seasoned veteran any day. I disagree, if it was a seasoned veteran that has played at IU (for example) for 3 years that is different than a seasoned veteran from Ohio U and Evansville.... I would take the Top 10 Recruit in this case. I think the talent is better but also think there is more to winning games than talent alone. Romeo excites the fanbase which puts more fans in the seats and that helps get wins this year! Does Ryan Taylor do that? Nope, most fans/students wouldn't know who he was. Romeo has the potential to be an elite scorer and Taylor would not be this. I understand Romeo could also be a bust so maybe the floor is higher for Taylor but the ceiling is higher with Romeo. IUsafety 1 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 https://www.courierpress.com/story/sports/college/evansville/2018/03/15/ryan-taylor-explore-other-options-after-two-seasons-evansville/430780002/Sounds like we have expressed interest Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners Class of '66 Old Fart, swingline91, ThompsonHoosier and 2 others 5 Quote
HoosierAloha Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 I believe option B wins more games early with option A having better chances later in the season. Can we have both? Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners ALASKA HOOSIER, taco corp and Brass Cannon 3 Quote
SouthwoodKnight2012 Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 Good question. I believe we would be better earlier in the season with B but by the time Feb-March rolls around I'll take my chances with option A. IUsafety 1 Quote
JSHoosier Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 Experience matters but so does top end talent, a guy from UE vs a McDs AA I'll take my chances with option A. Wouldn't complain about having Taylor off the bench though. IUsafety and Str8Hoosiers 2 Quote
Stuhoo Posted March 16, 2018 Author Posted March 16, 2018 6 minutes ago, SouthwoodKnight2012 said: Good question. I believe we would be better earlier in the season with B but by the time Feb-March rolls around I'll take my chances with option A. By the way...welcome to the board Southwood! mamasa and Class of '66 Old Fart 2 Quote
Brass Cannon Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 1 minute ago, JSHoosier said: Experience matters but so does top end talent, a guy from UE vs a McDs AA I'll take my chances with option A. Wouldn't complain about having Taylor off the bench though. Probably both start if we got both. thebigweave, taco corp and Stuhoo 3 Quote
SouthwoodKnight2012 Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 18 minutes ago, Stuhoo said: By the way...welcome to the board Southwood! Thank you. I heard about the forum from a fellow Hoosier who is holding down the fort in Lafayette. HoosierAloha, Stuhoo, ALASKA HOOSIER and 2 others 5 Quote
cleeter Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, Str8Hoosiers said: I disagree, if it was a seasoned veteran that has played at IU (for example) for 3 years that is different than a seasoned veteran from Ohio U and Evansville.... I would take the Top 10 Recruit in this case. I think the talent is better but also think there is more to winning games than talent alone. Romeo excites the fanbase which puts more fans in the seats and that helps get wins this year! Does Ryan Taylor do that? Nope, most fans/students wouldn't know who he was. Romeo has the potential to be an elite scorer and Taylor would not be this. I understand Romeo could also be a bust so maybe the floor is higher for Taylor but the ceiling is higher with Romeo. I agree with you. For instance, lets compare romeo to "veteran transfers" of years before (not saying these transfers are as good as taylor, but just for theory of debate) Romeo > Newkirk (veteran) Romeo > Zeisloft (loved him, but still) Romeo > McSwain Experience is very valuable, but sometimes talent like romeo is worth way more than 2 years at a DII school or a school that plays in a weak conference. Edited March 16, 2018 by cleeter thebigweave, Str8Hoosiers and IUsafety 3 Quote
LamarCheeks Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 With lineup A, we would go 35-4 and reach the Final Four. With lineup B, we would go 33-5 and reach the Elite Eight. With a combination of both (and a healthy, productive De'Ron), we'd go 40-0 and win the NCAA title. ... In all seriousness, I think lineup A would get the better results. Sure, Taylor has more experience, but both he and Romeo would be in their first years with Archie and I have to think Romeo is the more talented player, so in the end, I go with talent. thebigweave, IUsafety, bigrod and 2 others 5 Quote
Hovadipo Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 1 hour ago, SouthwoodKnight2012 said: Thank you. I heard about the forum from a fellow Hoosier who is holding down the fort in Lafayette. Doing the Lord’s work. Welcome. IUsafety, SouthwoodKnight2012 and ALASKA HOOSIER 3 Quote
Stuhoo Posted March 16, 2018 Author Posted March 16, 2018 8 minutes ago, Hovadipo said: Doing the Lord’s work. Welcome. Whoa, whoa...wait a second: the new guy is a Hova referral? That changes everything ;) mamasa, ALASKA HOOSIER and thebigweave 2 1 Quote
hoosierdogg Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 1 hour ago, cleeter said: I agree with you. For instance, lets compare romeo to "veteran transfers" of years before (not saying these transfers are as good as taylor, but just for theory of debate) Romeo > Newkirk (veteran) Romeo > Zeisloft (loved him, but still) Romeo > McSwain Experience is very valuable, but sometimes talent like romeo is worth way more than 2 years at a DII school or a school that plays in a weak conference. Keith Smart? Dean Garret? And what about Max Bielfeldt? Pretty much a non-factor at Michigan until his senior year, and was a major contributor at IU as a fifth year grad transfer, on a Big Ten championship team. Maturity (22 year old vs. 18 year old) and experience can make up for talent difference (see Kentucky). Both players the same size, both with scorer mentality, one 18 years old with experience against less talented high school competition, the other 22 years old with 3 years experience against D1 competition (albeit it low-to-mid level)....idk. either would fill a huge need for IU, both would be even better. thebigweave and HoosierHoops1 2 Quote
HoosierFan1994 Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 I think both lineups are 20 win starting lineups. I just think Romeo is going to have an enormous impact on where he goes. I really do believe (yes, I'm biased) that we could be a final four contender next year with him. I think he should be the #1 or #2 player in the country for 2018. Ryan Taylor is a good 5th year senior but he's not Romeo Langford. I say Lineup A is Elite 8/Final Four and Lineup B is Rd of 32/Sweet 16. ALASKA HOOSIER and Str8Hoosiers 2 Quote
cleeter Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 (edited) 15 minutes ago, hoosierdogg said: Keith Smart? Dean Garret? And what about Max Bielfeldt? Pretty much a non-factor at Michigan until his senior year, and was a major contributor at IU as a fifth year grad transfer, on a Big Ten championship team. Maturity (22 year old vs. 18 year old) and experience can make up for talent difference (see Kentucky). Both players the same size, both with scorer mentality, one 18 years old with experience against less talented high school competition, the other 22 years old with 3 years experience against D1 competition (albeit it low-to-mid level)....idk. either would fill a huge need for IU, both would be even better. Very valid point. I mean it can go both ways. I wasnt trying to say that i would ALWAYS take the freshman against a veteran. But i do like you examples and it totally shows that it can be a toss up at times and with some players, the veteran could be a better option from time to time or at least be a toss up. Edited March 16, 2018 by cleeter Quote
Class of '66 Old Fart Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 I honestly don't know which lineup produces more wins as I can see the pros and cons that others have already expressed. However, I think a huge intangible for the program going forward is to land Romeo even if it's only for 1 year. HoosierAloha and GloryDays 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.