JSHoosier Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 Only 9 turnovers, and none in the first 15 minutes. That's a refreshing change of pace. That's what you want in a blue blood match-up, two heavyweights trading punches. IU needs post depth in a bad way though. southsidehoosier, thebigweave, CR3AMnCR1MS0N and 2 others 5 Quote
Popular Post JSHoosier Posted November 30, 2017 Popular Post Posted November 30, 2017 3 minutes ago, Sota Hoosier said: We are currently #219 on defense. Despite the improvements on defense (which there have been), there is a long way to go on D. Duke can beat you in so many ways it's almost not fair but I thought we had solid stretches of good defense last night. If you look at the box score, the overall stats are very similar between the two teams. We just missed free throws and couldn't convert on a couple threes. Very proud of how the guys competed and how well Archie had them prepared. How would a Crean team perform while only going 5/21 from three??? I think there is a lot this team can accomplish this season and I'm excited to see how they progress. If a Crean team went 5/21 from 3 against that Duke team, they'd have been down 30. thebigweave, southsidehoosier, kottke and 5 others 8 Quote
SlamaJamaSisley Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 I haven't read through the entire thread so sorry if this has already been shared here but I love the Above the Rim replay of the game. Fans were as expected, incredible! http://www.espn.com/watch/player?id=3230175 (headphones recommended) ALASKA HOOSIER 1 Quote
mark1981 Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 1 hour ago, HinnyHoosier said: Some girl was "dancing" behind Bilas as he talked to Scott Van Pelt after the game. What happened? Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Quote
Sota Hoosier Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 29 minutes ago, JSHoosier said: If a Crean team went 5/21 from 3 against that Duke team, they'd have been down 30. Exactly. It's scary to even think about what would have happened. ALASKA HOOSIER 1 Quote
323SGrant Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 Exactly. It's scary to even think about what would have happened.This may have been previously mentioned, but I thought Moore would provide more by this point in the season.Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Quote
Stromboli Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 7 minutes ago, 323SGrant said: This may have been previously mentioned, but I thought Moore would provide more by this point in the season. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Clifton Less ElectricBoogaloo, 323SGrant, MikeRoberts and 1 other 4 Quote
Old Friend Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 10 minutes ago, 323SGrant said: This may have been previously mentioned, but I thought Moore would provide more by this point in the season. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app He was a project and one of those guys Crean found he probably felt was a diamond in the rough and out-thought the room. Clifton Moore was not highly regarded for many reasons, but one is he's just not ready. He's thin, he's not strong with the ball; and frankly, he's not all that talented. A 6'10" kid who's better on the perimeter. We saw last night how valuable paint bigs are. InsidetheHall wrote about him as a "sleeper." Yawn. Crean and his "sleepers." I've kinda' had enough of "sleepers." I'd rather know what I'm getting, whatever that is. ALASKA HOOSIER, 323SGrant, MikeRoberts and 1 other 4 Quote
JSHoosier Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 32 minutes ago, 323SGrant said: This may have been previously mentioned, but I thought Moore would provide more by this point in the season. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app I wasn't high on him to begin with. IMO it says a lot for where he is that he couldn't get time over McRoberts when we badly needed size. thebigweave and 323SGrant 2 Quote
Brass Cannon Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 Just now, Fkfootball1 said: Creans desperate recruiting landed us Priller and Moore. Moore should contribute one day mamasa, Stromboli and MIUGA 3 Quote
JSHoosier Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 1 minute ago, Fkfootball1 said: Creans desperate recruiting landed us Priller and Moore. You forgot April. Desperate must be one hell of a drug. Quote
Brass Cannon Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 Isn't funny people were worried about our offense this year. Can't imagine what Archie will do when he has the right people for his offensive system and defensive system southsidehoosier and Stromboli 2 Quote
OliviaPope40 Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 For those who didn't hear what was chanted last night. mamasa 1 Quote
Stromboli Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 28 minutes ago, Old Friend said: He was a project and one of those guys Crean found he probably felt was a diamond in the rough and out-thought the room. Clifton Moore was not highly regarded for many reasons, but one is he's just not ready. He's thin, he's not strong with the ball; and frankly, he's not all that talented. A 6'10" kid who's better on the perimeter. We saw last night how valuable paint bigs are. InsidetheHall wrote about him as a "sleeper." Yawn. Crean and his "sleepers." I've kinda' had enough of "sleepers." I'd rather know what I'm getting, whatever that is. Clifton isn't in the same bucket as Priller or Gelon. Clifton had better national acclaim (rankings) than Green, Morgan, or Collin, and those guys are leading the team right now. Were they reaches too? Some of our favorite IU players are because Crean would "reach," so I'm really not down with the hate. Just because Clifton hasn't panned out YET doesn't mean much. We knew he was skinny/under-developed when he came here. He's already filling out. I understand that he shows flashes in practice at times. He did not play a high level of ball in high school, and he's not ready to contribute. Also, a 6'10" kid better from the perimeter is what everyone wants right now. Not sure how that's a knock. Get him in there where he's not afraid to bump around and he can contribute. Me So Hornsby, CR3AMnCR1MS0N, Josh and 3 others 6 Quote
Old Friend Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 19 minutes ago, JSHoosier said: You forgot April. Desperate must be one hell of a drug. And Guy-Marc Michele among others. Quote
Old Friend Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 Just now, Stromboli said: Clifton isn't in the same bucket as Priller or Gelon. Clifton had better national acclaim (rankings) than Green, Morgan, or Collin, and those guys are leading the team right now. Were they reaches too? Some of our favorite IU players are because Crean would "reach," so I'm really not down with the hate. Just because Clifton hasn't panned out YET doesn't mean much. We knew he was skinny/under-developed when he came here. He's already filling out. I understand that he shows flashes in practice at times. He did not play a high level of ball in high school, and he's not ready to contribute. Also, a 6'10" kid better from the perimeter is what everyone wants right now. Not sure how that's a knock. Get him in there where he's not afraid to bump around and he can contribute. You watched last night's game, right? Quote
BlueDevil Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 Tom Crean will be on the DD show todaySent from my iPhone using BtownBanners Quote
Popular Post Stromboli Posted November 30, 2017 Popular Post Posted November 30, 2017 Just now, Old Friend said: You watched last night's game, right? Just FYI, I'm not getting into a back-and-forth internet fight here. Make your point if you wish. The Draft Express attention Clifton received wasn't for his talent now. It's because he has the build that everyone wants. Thrives in the small ball, can switch and guard multiple positions, spread the floor. 3 point shots are up because they work. Traditional use of back-to-the-basket centers is down. Let the kid develop. He was never a player expected to contribute his freshman year. Walking Boot of Doom, Str8Hoosiers, HoosierDYT and 6 others 9 Quote
Sota Hoosier Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 1 minute ago, Stromboli said: Just FYI, I'm not getting into a back-and-forth internet fight here. Make your point if you wish. The Draft Express attention Clifton received wasn't for his talent now. It's because he has the build that everyone wants. Thrives in the small ball, can switch and guard multiple positions, spread the floor. 3 point shots are up because they work. Traditional use of back-to-the-basket centers is down. Let the kid develop. He was never a player expected to contribute his freshman year. Couldn't agree more. The kid had limited AAU exposure and didn't play high-level high school ball. I still have faith he'll be a key piece in the future. As Archie said, he needs to learn the game and build his bball IQ and part of that is learning the pace of high-level D1 hoops and adjusting to the talent level. I like that he can play on the perimeter and hit jumpers and I'm glad he's a Hoosier. Stromboli and mamasa 2 Quote
bigrod Posted November 30, 2017 Posted November 30, 2017 2 minutes ago, Sota Hoosier said: Couldn't agree more. The kid had limited AAU exposure and didn't play high-level high school ball. I still have faith he'll be a key piece in the future. As Archie said, he needs to learn the game and build his bball IQ and part of that is learning the pace of high-level D1 hoops and adjusting to the talent level. I like that he can play on the perimeter and hit jumpers and I'm glad he's a Hoosier. I'm pretty sure I read over the summer that Archie wanted to red-shirt him, but he wouldn't come if he did. I wouldn't classify him at all as a reach, but more just a player who needs some time to develop. HooHooHoo22 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.