TheWatShot Posted January 17, 2021 Posted January 17, 2021 4 minutes ago, KingPG21 said: Packers holder botched the hold on their second touchdown, just kind of handed it to the kicker. He kind of got taken down pretty hard too. Next one Packers we’re trying to go up 17 rather than 16. And the owne by the Rams they were trying to get it to 7 rather than 8 I've never understood going for 2 to make it a 7 point game instead of 8. If you miss, you're still down 2 scores. Quote
KingPG21 Posted January 17, 2021 Posted January 17, 2021 4 minutes ago, TheWatShot said: I've never understood going for 2 to make it a 7 point game instead of 8. If you miss, you're still down 2 scores. Yah neither do I. I guess the logic is it gives you a better idea of what you’re gonna have to get to get back in it? But that logic is dumb when you’re just forcing yourself to have to score twice Quote
KingPG21 Posted January 17, 2021 Posted January 17, 2021 7 hours ago, Brass Cannon said: Technically 8 is a one score game If they had failed the two point conversion it would have been a 9 point game Quote
Josh Posted January 18, 2021 Posted January 18, 2021 I can't believe I'm cheering for a Purdumpster, but Poop Cheek is better than Tom Cheaty Quote
Hoosierfan2017 Posted January 18, 2021 Posted January 18, 2021 Tom Brady will be playing in his 14th conference championship game. That’s just nuts. Quote
johnsoniu Posted January 20, 2021 Posted January 20, 2021 Rivers calling it quits. Hope Ballard has a plan. Quote
Josh Posted January 20, 2021 Posted January 20, 2021 There's plenty of time to make a plan, it's not like he quit with two weeks before the first game. Who would do that lol Brissett? Eason? Quote
rcbowla Posted January 20, 2021 Posted January 20, 2021 There's plenty of time to make a plan, it's not like he quit with two weeks before the first game. Who would do that lol Brissett? Eason?Watson....I know it ain't gonna happen. Maybe Darnold or WentzSent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk Quote
Josh Posted January 20, 2021 Posted January 20, 2021 24 minutes ago, rcs29 said: Watson....I know it ain't gonna happen. Maybe Darnold or Wentz Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk Would be awesome though. I like Darnold enough too. Pass on Wentz. His contract and his play. Quote
rcbowla Posted January 20, 2021 Posted January 20, 2021 Would be awesome though. I like Darnold enough too. Pass on Wentz. His contract and his play.Tend to agree. Just seems like a real possibility with Reich having already built a rapport with Wentz. Don't really want him either.Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk Quote
KingPG21 Posted January 20, 2021 Posted January 20, 2021 As long as they don’t try it again with Brisset I’m good. Oh and don’t try go go after Minshew. Quote
Josh Posted January 20, 2021 Posted January 20, 2021 I just read that the Eagles are all in on keeping Wentz. That makes me happy I'd have to think that Eason gets his shot next year. Otherwise Ballard is essentially admitting to throwing away a 4th rounder. Probably gonna be a Brissett/Eason qb room Quote
johnsoniu Posted January 20, 2021 Posted January 20, 2021 On Dan Patrick today he said he was told the Colts were all set to take Jordan Love and the packers found out and snaked us. Eason was the fall back option. Makes me think they viewed Eason as a 2 year project to get ready and hoped Phil would give them 2 years.I’m not opposed to giving Darnold a shot if it’s a team friendly deal.Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners Quote
Aaron Posted January 21, 2021 Posted January 21, 2021 1 hour ago, johnsoniu said: On Dan Patrick today he said he was told the Colts were all set to take Jordan Love and the packers found out and snaked us. Eason was the fall back option. Makes me think they viewed Eason as a 2 year project to get ready and hoped Phil would give them 2 years. I’m not opposed to giving Darnold a shot if it’s a team friendly deal. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners That makes no sense. Why would the Packers have any incentive to screw the Colts, a team in the other conference they have no connection to? I am not doubting Patrick said it, but I am just not sure that is true as Packers would have zero reason to screw Colts. Quote
johnsoniu Posted January 21, 2021 Posted January 21, 2021 2 minutes ago, Aaron said: That makes no sense. Why would the Packers have any incentive to screw the Colts, a team in the other conference they have no connection to? I am not doubting Patrick said it, but I am just not sure that is true as Packers would have zero reason to screw Colts. I don't think it was to screw the colts necessarily, they wanted him also but found out they couldn't wait so had to pull the trigger earlier than they had planned. Aaron 1 Quote
KingPG21 Posted January 22, 2021 Posted January 22, 2021 On 1/20/2021 at 6:17 PM, johnsoniu said: On Dan Patrick today he said he was told the Colts were all set to take Jordan Love and the packers found out and snaked us. Eason was the fall back option. Makes me think they viewed Eason as a 2 year project to get ready and hoped Phil would give them 2 years. I’m not opposed to giving Darnold a shot if it’s a team friendly deal. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners Wonder how the Colts feel about Trey Lance then. Similar type of prospect. Quote
Magisterium Posted January 22, 2021 Posted January 22, 2021 On 1/20/2021 at 10:54 AM, Josh said: I just read that the Eagles are all in on keeping Wentz. That makes me happy I'd have to think that Eason gets his shot next year. Otherwise Ballard is essentially admitting to throwing away a 4th rounder. Probably gonna be a Brissett/Eason qb room if so that tells me the Colts' "Luck-Rivers" window has closed and it's officially a rebuild--don't see either of those QBs leading the Colts to the Super Bowl, no matter how good the OL and RBs are Quote
Magisterium Posted January 23, 2021 Posted January 23, 2021 (edited) On 1/20/2021 at 4:17 PM, johnsoniu said: On Dan Patrick today he said he was told the Colts were all set to take Jordan Love and the packers found out and snaked us. Eason was the fall back option. Makes me think they viewed Eason as a 2 year project to get ready and hoped Phil would give them 2 years. I’m not opposed to giving Darnold a shot if it’s a team friendly deal. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners I'd rather try for Stafford--he at least has had some "elite" seasons before his injuries piled up. Darnold hasn't shown me much so far, and just putting him behind the Colts' OL doesn't guarantee his play will improve dramatically. To me, he's essentially a more mobile Eason with less arm talent. Rather than give up draft capital for him and hope he "blossoms" w/ the Colts, I'd almost prefer to try to sign Fitzpatrick for a year and make Eason the starter-in-waiting. And maybe also sign one of the free agent OTs and use #21 on either a premier CB if one's there, or on one of the edge rushers who probably will be there. Edited January 23, 2021 by Magisterium dfggh Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.