Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Joe DeLow said:


We still lost to Arkansas. We beat NW but this team has a long way to go before becoming an NCAA tourney team. Our 5 out of conference games were Marquette, Arky, Duke, Butler and Louisville. We are 1-2. Butler and Louisville are now must wins. And with how this team deals with pressure, the UofL game is going to be really tough. There isn’t much to be optimistic about. We look like an NIT team.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

 

Before we beat NW, Lunardi’s Bracketology had as an NCAA 7 seed.

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Joe DeLow said:


That’s pretty sad for CBB then. But the last couple years standards have dropped as more teams with losing conference records have gotten in.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

 

Not sure why that’s “sad.”

The entirety of the sport has always had exactly a .500 winning percentage.

Someone’s eye test as to which teams are the 50 best is a product of personal preference for which teams perform above that mean.

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Joe DeLow said:


Well numbers show that over the past decade or so that at large mid majors perform better than power conference teams that were below .500 in conference or won less than 20 games. You shouldn’t get in if you can’t go .500 and win 20. There should be a standard.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

 

Well stated ... not sure I agree with your preference. 

For at large bids, there has definitely been a trend toward power 5 conference 20 win teams over small conference 25+ win teams.

Matter of personal preference I guess - and as an IU fan I selfishly prefer the “more P5” version because it’ll get us in during our lesser years.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Joe DeLow said:


I get why the committee puts those teams in($$$). But they are sub .500 in conference and 19 win teams for a reason. It doesn’t change in the tourney. The only Final Four team to come from the group is the Cuse team from a few years ago.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

 

And the only mid major to get far has been Loyola last year ... and I believe they got the auto-bid.

 

Posted
 
And the only mid major to get far has been Loyola last year ... and I believe they got the auto-bid.
 

So much more goes into the decision to put in middle of the pack power 5 conference teams over mid majors. People can show numbers for why mid majors should be in while others can show numbers that back up why they pick power 5 teams. Teams that just make the tournament have all shown they can lose games but the teams that separate themselves from the others are ones that show they can win against tournament quality teams. Middle of the pack power 5 team is always going to have more opportunities to do this. Is it fair to mid majors? No but that’s where the system is. Mid majors don’t help themselves I some cases. St Mary’s last year had a SOS in the 300’s. Played nobody in the non conference and lost to the 2 toughest teams in non conference to which were non tournament teams (Georgia and Washington St). Finished 27-4. Only wins against tournament teams were Gonzaga, and New Mexico st
Personally I had no problem with the committee leaving them out and putting Syracuse in with a 8-10 conference record
Syracuse took advantage and ended up in the sweet 16.



Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted

He probably will be. He isn’t near ready though. He’s 6-6 215 that doesn’t realize how big and strong he is. I don’t think he realizes how he could easily control a game on both ends of the court. He has the tools to be a hell of a defensive player and his offense and shooting will come back to him.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
I know he is not ready but it wont matter. Zeller was not ready after two years either.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

Posted
What word would you use to describe it?

Ahhh, I see what you mean. I thought you were saying it’d be a weak/down year for the conference. I agree, it’s gonna be a deep dogfight among half to 3 quarters of the conference.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners
Posted
So who is going to hire Fred Hoiberg?
My shortlist:
Maryland
Texas
St. John’s
USC
UCLA
 
He played the fast paced offense at Iowa State. Any of those schools could be looking for a change after this season.
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners
 
My vote is UCLA

Sent from my Pixel XL using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted
1 hour ago, Joe DeLow said:

So who is going to hire Fred Hoiberg?

My shortlist:

Maryland

Texas

St. John’s

USC

UCLA

 

He played the fast paced offense at Iowa State. Any of those schools could be looking for a change after this season.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

 

I don't see Turgeon, Shaka or the USC coach losing their jobs this year. The USC coach has the #1 recruiting class in 2019. 

UCLA makes a lot of sense. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...