Stuhoo Posted December 2, 2018 Posted December 2, 2018 1 hour ago, Joe DeLow said: We still lost to Arkansas. We beat NW but this team has a long way to go before becoming an NCAA tourney team. Our 5 out of conference games were Marquette, Arky, Duke, Butler and Louisville. We are 1-2. Butler and Louisville are now must wins. And with how this team deals with pressure, the UofL game is going to be really tough. There isn’t much to be optimistic about. We look like an NIT team. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Before we beat NW, Lunardi’s Bracketology had as an NCAA 7 seed. HoosierDYT, BGVille Hoosierfan and mamasa 3 Quote
Stuhoo Posted December 2, 2018 Posted December 2, 2018 3 hours ago, Joe DeLow said: That’s pretty sad for CBB then. But the last couple years standards have dropped as more teams with losing conference records have gotten in. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Not sure why that’s “sad.” The entirety of the sport has always had exactly a .500 winning percentage. Someone’s eye test as to which teams are the 50 best is a product of personal preference for which teams perform above that mean. thebigweave, mamasa and raorIU 3 Quote
Stuhoo Posted December 2, 2018 Posted December 2, 2018 19 minutes ago, Joe DeLow said: Well numbers show that over the past decade or so that at large mid majors perform better than power conference teams that were below .500 in conference or won less than 20 games. You shouldn’t get in if you can’t go .500 and win 20. There should be a standard. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Well stated ... not sure I agree with your preference. For at large bids, there has definitely been a trend toward power 5 conference 20 win teams over small conference 25+ win teams. Matter of personal preference I guess - and as an IU fan I selfishly prefer the “more P5” version because it’ll get us in during our lesser years. thebigweave 1 Quote
Stuhoo Posted December 2, 2018 Posted December 2, 2018 1 minute ago, Joe DeLow said: I get why the committee puts those teams in($$$). But they are sub .500 in conference and 19 win teams for a reason. It doesn’t change in the tourney. The only Final Four team to come from the group is the Cuse team from a few years ago. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app And the only mid major to get far has been Loyola last year ... and I believe they got the auto-bid. Quote
Uspshoosier Posted December 2, 2018 Posted December 2, 2018 I get why the committee puts those teams in($$$). But they are sub .500 in conference and 19 win teams for a reason. It doesn’t change in the tourney. The only Final Four team to come from the group is the Cuse team from a few years ago. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile appCuse was 9-9 in conference that year Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Quote
Uspshoosier Posted December 2, 2018 Posted December 2, 2018 And the only mid major to get far has been Loyola last year ... and I believe they got the auto-bid. So much more goes into the decision to put in middle of the pack power 5 conference teams over mid majors. People can show numbers for why mid majors should be in while others can show numbers that back up why they pick power 5 teams. Teams that just make the tournament have all shown they can lose games but the teams that separate themselves from the others are ones that show they can win against tournament quality teams. Middle of the pack power 5 team is always going to have more opportunities to do this. Is it fair to mid majors? No but that’s where the system is. Mid majors don’t help themselves I some cases. St Mary’s last year had a SOS in the 300’s. Played nobody in the non conference and lost to the 2 toughest teams in non conference to which were non tournament teams (Georgia and Washington St). Finished 27-4. Only wins against tournament teams were Gonzaga, and New Mexico st Personally I had no problem with the committee leaving them out and putting Syracuse in with a 8-10 conference recordSyracuse took advantage and ended up in the sweet 16. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Str8Hoosiers, Stuhoo and IUsafety 3 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted December 2, 2018 Posted December 2, 2018 VCU and Wichita State did I believe. I can get the numbers when I’m home since 2000. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile appGeorge Mason as well Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app IUsafety and Joe DeLow 2 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted December 2, 2018 Posted December 2, 2018 Um...Butler?Butler won the auto- bid both years. I believe he is talking about teams that make a run with an at-large bid Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Joe DeLow 1 Quote
Red1 Posted December 2, 2018 Posted December 2, 2018 Nebraska's up on Illinois, but this game is sloppy so far. Quote
Bailey7878 Posted December 2, 2018 Posted December 2, 2018 He probably will be. He isn’t near ready though. He’s 6-6 215 that doesn’t realize how big and strong he is. I don’t think he realizes how he could easily control a game on both ends of the court. He has the tools to be a hell of a defensive player and his offense and shooting will come back to him.Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile appI know he is not ready but it wont matter. Zeller was not ready after two years either.Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk BGVille Hoosierfan 1 Quote
Bobman1 Posted December 3, 2018 Posted December 3, 2018 Big Ten is going to be brutal this year. Gotta take advantage of our HC advantage. Uhh what, half the conference is ranked. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners Quote
Brass Cannon Posted December 3, 2018 Posted December 3, 2018 1 minute ago, Calipari said: Uhh what, half the conference is ranked. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners What word would you use to describe it? Quote
Zach Posted December 3, 2018 Posted December 3, 2018 He meant brutally tough....not brutally horrible lol. HoosierHoops1 1 Quote
Bobman1 Posted December 3, 2018 Posted December 3, 2018 What word would you use to describe it?Ahhh, I see what you mean. I thought you were saying it’d be a weak/down year for the conference. I agree, it’s gonna be a deep dogfight among half to 3 quarters of the conference. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners Quote
OliviaPope40 Posted December 3, 2018 Posted December 3, 2018 22 hours ago, Uspshoosier said: Cuse was 9-9 in conference that year Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app And yet got in the tournament somehow. Quote
rcbowla Posted December 3, 2018 Posted December 3, 2018 So who is going to hire Fred Hoiberg?My shortlist:Maryland TexasSt. John’sUSCUCLA He played the fast paced offense at Iowa State. Any of those schools could be looking for a change after this season. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners My vote is UCLASent from my Pixel XL using BtownBanners mobile app Quote
Brass Cannon Posted December 3, 2018 Posted December 3, 2018 4 minutes ago, rcs29 said: My vote is UCLA Sent from my Pixel XL using BtownBanners mobile app Yep Quote
TXHoosierDaddy Posted December 3, 2018 Posted December 3, 2018 1 hour ago, Joe DeLow said: So who is going to hire Fred Hoiberg? My shortlist: Maryland Texas St. John’s USC UCLA He played the fast paced offense at Iowa State. Any of those schools could be looking for a change after this season. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners I don't see Turgeon, Shaka or the USC coach losing their jobs this year. The USC coach has the #1 recruiting class in 2019. UCLA makes a lot of sense. WayneFleekHoosier 1 Quote
Napleshoosier Posted December 3, 2018 Posted December 3, 2018 I don't see Turgeon, Shaka or the USC coach losing their jobs this year. The USC coach has the #1 recruiting class in 2019. UCLA makes a lot of sense. Andy Enfield atUSC isn’t going anywhere!Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app TXHoosierDaddy 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.