Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

Why weren't they going to go deep in the playoffs with Donovan Mitchell?

Admittedly, the East likely to kinda suck next season, but Cleveland is the #1 favorite to win the East next year with Mitchell as their alpha.

In Mitchell's 5 seasons in Utah, the Jazz won a total of 2 playoff series and simply weren't going deep into the postseason.  With that said, I think the Jazz would have kept him if he was happy there.

Posted

Ok, someone please clarify, is it Hansen Yang or Yang Hansen?

Either is an objectively awesome name.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Demo said:

Ok, someone please clarify, is it Hansen Yang or Yang Hansen?

Either is an objectively awesome name.

I'm going with Yas Hangen

Posted
11 hours ago, Home Jersey said:

Sure… and still deemed talented enough to take at #5 overall without the drafting team even getting to work him out first lol. He’s got a lot of upside if he’s 6’7.5 or 6’9 in shoes or whatever. He has a 7’ wingspan. Him and Clayton give Utah fans plenty to be excited about. And perhaps going somewhere less flashy is exactly what Bailey needs to lock in on his development and tune out negative influences in his camp. Could just as easily see it working out as going bust.

Draft position alone guarantees nothing.  In terms of going 5th, I wouldn't say seeing it as likely working out as going bust is an endorsement.  #5 guys shouldn't be 50% bust.

The thought was that Utah gave him a guarantee that if he got to 5 that they insured him they would select him.  His advisers seemed to want to go with that assurance as opposed to risk him going two, three or four.

Posted
32 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Draft position alone guarantees nothing.  In terms of going 5th, I wouldn't say seeing it as likely working out as going bust is an endorsement.  #5 guys shouldn't be 50% bust.

The thought was that Utah gave him a guarantee that if he got to 5 that they insured him they would select him.  His advisers seemed to want to go with that assurance as opposed to risk him going two, three or four.

Like you said, draft position guarantees nothing so I don’t buy the assertion that #5 guys “shouldn’t” be 50% bust without some data to back up the claim. Way more guys “bust” than not in the NBA so calling it 50/50 if he pans out to be the star player he is projected to be, I’d say is a somewhat favorable view. Even if he does “bust” he may carve out a decent role / career in the league IMO. 

He’s not a perfect player at all but he’s got a lot of talent and potential to be a team’s “alpha” … IMO that is why Ainge chose to draft him despite reportedly being told they were not a preferred destination. You say “gave him a guarantee” - I wonder if Ace’s camp viewed that as a promise or a threat, lol. In any case based on his interviews it sounds like he’s handling it professionally (as he should) and will be able to focus on basketball in an environment that’s pretty conducive to his development in a star role.

Again, he was always a high risk/high reward prospect and Utah needs a young centerpiece to be the guy. Therefore I see no reason to believe there are “VERY” long odds of it working out in Utah specifically. Seems like it was the obvious choice? And potentially great value at #5

Posted
1 hour ago, Home Jersey said:

Like you said, draft position guarantees nothing so I don’t buy the assertion that #5 guys “shouldn’t” be 50% bust without some data to back up the claim. Way more guys “bust” than not in the NBA so calling it 50/50 if he pans out to be the star player he is projected to be, I’d say is a somewhat favorable view. Even if he does “bust” he may carve out a decent role / career in the league IMO. 

He’s not a perfect player at all but he’s got a lot of talent and potential to be a team’s “alpha” … IMO that is why Ainge chose to draft him despite reportedly being told they were not a preferred destination. You say “gave him a guarantee” - I wonder if Ace’s camp viewed that as a promise or a threat, lol. In any case based on his interviews it sounds like he’s handling it professionally (as he should) and will be able to focus on basketball in an environment that’s pretty conducive to his development in a star role.

Again, he was always a high risk/high reward prospect and Utah needs a young centerpiece to be the guy. Therefore I see no reason to believe there are “VERY” long odds of it working out in Utah specifically. Seems like it was the obvious choice? And potentially great value at #5

I googled ‘NBA #5 selections’ and suggest you do the same.  Not many players I would call busts.  Depends on your definition.  There is a difference being between being not worthy of the fifth pick and being a ‘bust’.  Were Ricky Rubio and Jeff Green busts because they were picked fifth?  I say they were not busts.

Posted

Yang Hansen > Ace Bailey as a high ceiling prospect.

And it's not as much because Hansen dominated some piddly Chinese league at a young age; it's because of his style of play and especially because of what he did at Portland's pre-draft workouts against draftable guys.

7'1" with handles, an NBA ready body, quickness, and savant-level court vision? Right here is your draft day mega-steal:

 

Start this video of Hansen at the World U-19 tournament at the 1:30 mark. You'll see what I mean:

 

 

Posted
20 hours ago, Demo said:

https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/45585873/2026-nba-mock-draft-four-players-no-1-pick-options-peterson-dybantsa-boozer-ament
 

ESPN’s 1st ‘26 mock. What a ridiculously good class. Notable names:

19. Braylon Mullins

30. Braden Smith

49. Mackenzie Mgbako

55. Flory Bidunga 

 

 

 

Liam McNeely didn’t go until the end of the first round.  I would be shocked if Mullins is top 20 after his freshman year.

Posted

Myles to the Bucks for 4/107 with a year 4 player option and a full trade kicker. Congrats to Myles on cashing in, but in no universe should the Pacers have done that. Daniel Gafford, who’s not as good as Turner but a legit dude who’s younger signed for 3/54. Nic Claxton, baby. Make it happen, Pritch.

Posted

Looooove Myles, but no shot we should've done ~27/year. Probably not even if Tyrese was healthy next season. I can't imagine the meltdown next year after paying him 20+ then watching him flounder about on offense without Tyrese setting up all of his looks that got him that deal.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Hovadipo said:

Looooove Myles, but no shot we should've done ~27/year. Probably not even if Tyrese was healthy next season. I can't imagine the meltdown next year after paying him 20+ then watching him flounder about on offense without Tyrese setting up all of his looks that got him that deal.

Surely to God they don’t get in on Ayton, right?

Posted

Not exactly an NBA stat line, but because I'm an admitted hater, can someone tell me if a pro basketball player that is averaging: 

  • 18.2 ppg on
    • 39% fg and
    • 29.5% 3 pt, with
  • 5.9 turnovers per game

Would somehow be seen as a hyper-effective superstar?

Posted
17 minutes ago, Demo said:

Surely to God they don’t get in on Ayton, right?

Only if they want to see me self-harm.

The only bright side of that hypo would be that if anyone could get Ayton to play to his potential it'd be Rick.

Posted
1 minute ago, Stuhoo said:

Not exactly an NBA stat line, but because I'm an admitted hater, can someone tell me if a pro basketball player that is averaging: 

  • 18.2 ppg on
    • 39% fg and
    • 29.5% 3 pt, with
  • 5.9 turnovers per game

Would somehow be seen as a hyper-effective superstar?

This is evil.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...