Fire Coach Woodson Thread

[IUFAN1976 2,746]

Please Escort Mike Woodson from the building! 

[Stuhoo 79,254]

AGAIN

Bumping a thread with no substantive post is not forbidden by the board rules, but it is a bad idea because it makes the board a lesser read. It is all of our on-line IU sports community; please do your part to make it as good as it can be.

Thanks

[IUFAN1976 2,746]

16 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

AGAIN

Bumping a thread with no substantive post is not forbidden by the board rules, but it is a bad idea because it makes the board a lesser read. It is all of our on-line IU sports community; please do your part to make it as good as it can be.

Thanks

I thought it had good substance!  At least I didn’t just the word “bump”!  Or just type “FIRE MIKE WOODSON” again! I will try my best to do letter!

[Stuhoo 79,254]

On 8/6/2024 at 10:26 AM, Banksyrules said:

Hmmmmmmm………….fire Mike Woodson. 

 

On 8/6/2024 at 7:43 PM, IUFAN1976 said:

Perhaps we should crap can Mike Woodson!

 

17 hours ago, Muskie plays the four said:

Fire Mike Woodson new account

 

1 hour ago, IUFAN1976 said:

Please Escort Mike Woodson from the building! 

^^The entirety of posts in the past three days^^

I'm not going to delete posts that are within board rules, but I can re-title the thread to reflect it's current nature.

[Banksyrules 4,442]

2 hours ago, Stuhoo said:

 

 

 

^^The entirety of posts in the past three days^^

I'm not going to delete posts that are within board rules, but I can re-title the thread to reflect its current nature.

Like farts . I dealt it and therefore the title stays……. With the upmost respect of course (-;

[IUFAN1976 2,746]

I don’t want to speak for everyone, but I think we need a really superior performance from our team the entire year to really jump start this program and to end this thread once in for all, which is what some on here want. 
 

I think no less than 2nd in Battle For Atlantis.  2nd in the B10 conference season,  2nd in the B10 tournament, top 2 seed in the NCAA tournament, and at least an elite 8 appearance.  If that happens, I bet this thread goes away, IMO

 

[PartyintheVillas 36]

4 hours ago, IUFAN1976 said:

I don’t want to speak for everyone, but I think we need a really superior performance from our team the entire year to really jump start this program and to end this thread once in for all, which is what some on here want. 
 

I think no less than 2nd in Battle For Atlantis.  2nd in the B10 conference season,  2nd in the B10 tournament, top 2 seed in the NCAA tournament, and at least an elite 8 appearance.  If that happens, I bet this thread goes away, IMO

 

Aren't you one of most vocal of the fire Mike Woodson crowd?

[coonhounds 8,768]

I don’t want to speak for everyone, but I think we need a really superior performance from our team the entire year to really jump start this program and to end this thread once in for all, which is what some on here want. 
 
I think no less than 2nd in Battle For Atlantis.  2nd in the B10 conference season,  2nd in the B10 tournament, top 2 seed in the NCAA tournament, and at least an elite 8 appearance.  If that happens, I bet this thread goes away, IMO
 

This thread will definitely go away when iu basketball is back or close to where it should be. So your criteria would definitely Qualify. If we are in line for a 2 seed in ncaa tournament this thread will be quiet because we would be having a pretty good season imo. We will find out soon enough in about 2 and a half months

Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk

[IUFAN1976 2,746]

49 minutes ago, coonhounds said:

This thread will definitely go away when iu basketball is back or close to where it should be. So your criteria would definitely Qualify. If we are in line for a 2 seed in ncaa tournament this thread will be quiet because we would be having a pretty good season imo. We will find out soon enough in about 2 and a half months

Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk
 

I am glad someone finally and actually gets my post!  We all want the program to progress and succeed but the first 3 years of MW’s tenure has been mediocre.  Now that he has the most complete roster of his tenure, there is now no excuse for him to be at those levels I mentioned above.   We will see in a few months!

[Home Jersey 6,245]

Roster is talented for sure. Still having a tough time right now getting excited for IUBB this season. Pretty doubtful we'll do as well as many are thinking is likely, but will be happy if it happens. I'll believe it when I see it. Not much to say until then.

Let's go Hoosiers

[IUFAN1976 2,746]

4 hours ago, PartyintheVillas said:

Aren't you one of most vocal of the fire Mike Woodson crowd?

See above!   And I have mentioned several similar posts!   I am an IU fan first and foremost but I am not a MW fan; however, everything we bi**hed about he has started to correct with this roster and if we meet the criteria above, I really think this thread will fade away.  But there are many; including myself, that don’t have the confidence he will be able to do that 

[str8baller 4,964]

9 hours ago, coonhounds said:

This thread will definitely go away when iu basketball is back or close to where it should be. So your criteria would definitely Qualify. If we are in line for a 2 seed in ncaa tournament this thread will be quiet because we would be having a pretty good season imo. We will find out soon enough in about 2 and a half months

Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk
 

Rightfully or wrongfully,  I think tournament success will dictate a lot. In two decades,  we've managed good seeds, conf titles, and while not a BTT title,  it is ultimately pretty low stakes. But our tourney success has been limited to a few S16's. Two decades....20-plus years...and nothing in the tourney. For the first time in 40+ years Purdue has been to a FF more recently than IU.

 

  I think if we we're a 2 seed and crapped out early in the tourney,  Woody defenders would feel vindicated but his detractors would remain unsatisfied.  Otoh, a FF appearance would probably have everyone but the most perpetually disgruntled fans feeling Woody can navigate this new NIL era fairly successfully for a few more years.  

[IUFAN1976 2,746]

8 hours ago, str8baller said:

Rightfully or wrongfully,  I think tournament success will dictate a lot. In two decades,  we've managed good seeds, conf titles, and while not a BTT title,  it is ultimately pretty low stakes. But our tourney success has been limited to a few S16's. Two decades....20-plus years...and nothing in the tourney. For the first time in 40+ years Purdue has been to a FF more recently than IU.

 

  I think if we we're a 2 seed and crapped out early in the tourney,  Woody defenders would feel vindicated but his detractors would remain unsatisfied.  Otoh, a FF appearance would probably have everyone but the most perpetually disgruntled fans feeling Woody can navigate this new NIL era fairly successfully for a few more years.  

I can get behind this post!  Well said!

[Uspshoosier 44,831]

Woody’s 63-40 record broken down 

18-32 against NET top 50 teams (8-17 against top 25)

17-7 against NET 51-99

28-1 against NET 100 + ( 21-0 NET 150+)

 

[Hoosierfan2017 20,670]

9 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

Woody’s 60-43 record broken down 

18-32 against NET top 50 teams (8-17 against top 25)

17-7 against NET 51-99

28-1 against NET 100 + ( 21-0 NET 150+)

 

How many of the 43 losses are by double digits?

[Scotty R 2,127]

49 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

Woody’s 60-43 record broken down 

18-32 against NET top 50 teams (8-17 against top 25)

17-7 against NET 51-99

28-1 against NET 100 + ( 21-0 NET 150+)

 

His record is 63-40 not 60-43

[Uspshoosier 44,831]

45 minutes ago, Hoosierfan2017 said:

How many of the 43 losses are by double digits?

22

 

[Uspshoosier 44,831]

5 minutes ago, Scotty R said:

His record is 63-40 not 60-43

Typo.  Thanks for catching although numbers in the post for the breakdown show 63-40 

[IUFAN1976 2,746]

3 hours ago, Uspshoosier said:

22

 

That is over half of his loses, not a good thing.  What that tells me is either his game preparation sucks or he just plain gets out coached.  I think it’s a combination of both!

[IUFAN1976 2,746]

4 hours ago, Uspshoosier said:

Woody’s 63-40 record broken down 

18-32 against NET top 50 teams (8-17 against top 25)

17-7 against NET 51-99

28-1 against NET 100 + ( 21-0 NET 150+)

 

He sure beats up on the NET 100+ which could be why he stacked this years nonconference schedule with mostly 100+!  Mediocre Mike will be at his best!