Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Banksyrules

Fire Coach Woodson Thread

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Home Jersey said:

Playing devils advocate… if Dolson is “falling” for Stevens - swinging for home runs and missing - that’s definitely a factor in how we ended up with Woodson. If some narratives are to believed, striking out on Stevens last time was all the opportunity Buckner needed to railroad his guy in there. I get people who are over the idea of Stevens at this point and need to see it to believe it. Definitely worthwhile for Dolson to stay engaged with Stevens hoping the timing works out. But prioritization and timing and anticipating internal obstacles needs to be better this time around.

I also find it interesting that many here (not necessarily you) are putting Stevens and Dusty May in the category of "home run hires" and "big dogs"... and Dolson missed on Stevens (and Pearl) last year. Buckner had agreed to let Woodson go if Dolson could lock down a big name coach... Dusty was on the table, and is now considered a prime target, but it wasn't good enough for Buckner last year when it was significantly more possible.

After hiring Cignetti, and with Buckner (hopefully) out of the way, I am willing to sit back and let Scott Dolson do what he's paid to do - hire coaches... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, str8baller said:

That is good context.

 

It could also cut the other way: that’s all the more incentive for new ownership to pony up whatever it takes to keep Stevens there to guide them through that ordeal. 
 

Either way, I think the point that new ownership is variable that adds some uncertainty is a good one to keep in mind. 

I’m inclined to believe this makes new ownership pony up big time to keep him… maybe a small ownership stake. They will want continuity in the organization and you’re not gonna find a GM with a better reputation at the moment. They’re gonna offer him the world and a blank check IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, AZ Hoosier said:

I also find it interesting that many here (not necessarily you) are putting Stevens and Dusty May in the category of "home run hires" and "big dogs"... and Dolson missed on Stevens (and Pearl) last year. Buckner had agreed to let Woodson go if Dolson could lock down a big name coach... Dusty was on the table, and is now considered a prime target, but it wasn't good enough for Buckner last year when it was significantly more possible.

After hiring Cignetti, and with Buckner (hopefully) out of the way, I am willing to sit back and let Scott Dolson do what he's paid to do - hire coaches... 

That was likely just a cop out by Buckner.  He knew they probably couldn’t get Stevens and Dolson would never be allowed to hire Pearl.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Home Jersey said:

I’m inclined to believe this makes new ownership pony up big time to keep him… maybe a small ownership stake. They will want continuity in the organization and you’re not gonna find a GM with a better reputation at the moment. They’re gonna offer him the world and a blank check IMO.

You never know. You also don't know if he wants to handle a rebuild. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, AZ Hoosier said:

I also find it interesting that many here (not necessarily you) are putting Stevens and Dusty May in the category of "home run hires" and "big dogs"... and Dolson missed on Stevens (and Pearl) last year. Buckner had agreed to let Woodson go if Dolson could lock down a big name coach... Dusty was on the table, and is now considered a prime target, but it wasn't good enough for Buckner last year when it was significantly more possible.

After hiring Cignetti, and with Buckner (hopefully) out of the way, I am willing to sit back and let Scott Dolson do what he's paid to do - hire coaches... 

Buckner didn't approve of Pearl. Dolson didn't miss on him. Buckner didn't think Dusty was good enough either. Brad said the time wasn't right. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Hornsby said:

Steven's isn't coming until he does. I'm not falling for that talk again it's how we nd up with guys like Woodson. Brad says no so here is Michael Lewis for 7 years. He is an iu guy!!!

 

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Fans thinking we'd get Stevens is how we got Woodson?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, ap2345 said:

Thanks Matty. Great idea. Coach Woodson wishes you good luck with the big game tonight

Lol. Hey I'm just saying it would be the ultimate Troll to Purdue fans if he flipped. I hate Purdue but I can't deny Painter is the best coach in the Big Ten.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, AZ Hoosier said:

I also find it interesting that many here (not necessarily you) are putting Stevens and Dusty May in the category of "home run hires" and "big dogs"... and Dolson missed on Stevens (and Pearl) last year. Buckner had agreed to let Woodson go if Dolson could lock down a big name coach... Dusty was on the table, and is now considered a prime target, but it wasn't good enough for Buckner last year when it was significantly more possible.

After hiring Cignetti, and with Buckner (hopefully) out of the way, I am willing to sit back and let Scott Dolson do what he's paid to do - hire coaches... 

I don't think we missed on Pearl from what I was told. Buckner just vetoed it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, HoosierMatty said:

Lol. Hey I'm just saying it would be the ultimate Troll to Purdue fans if he flipped. I hate Purdue but I can't deny Painter is the best coach in the Big Ten.

I know. It would never happen. I also felt like building off of the Matty cameo Woodson got tricked into doing lol 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Playing devils advocate… if Dolson is “falling” for Stevens - swinging for home runs and missing - that’s definitely a factor in how we ended up with Woodson. If some narratives are to believed, striking out on Stevens last time was all the opportunity Buckner needed to railroad his guy in there. I get people who are over the idea of Stevens at this point and need to see it to believe it. Definitely worthwhile for Dolson to stay engaged with Stevens hoping the timing works out. But prioritization and timing and anticipating internal obstacles needs to be better this time around.
Exactly my point.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Buckner didn't approve of Pearl. Dolson didn't miss on him. Buckner didn't think Dusty was good enough either. Brad said the time wasn't right. 
We have limit ourselves because we don't dare touch guys like pearl or beard. We are to darn holy for them.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Kentuckysucks said:

That was likely just a cop out by Buckner.  He knew they probably couldn’t get Stevens and Dolson would never be allowed to hire Pearl.

I completely understand that it was manipulation by Buckner, but my point is that Indiana didn't get May last year and now he's one of the top two names on almost everyone's list.. and while I'd love to see Dusty at Indiana, I am not sure how viable it really is. What a difference one year makes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pessimists don’t accomplish greatness, optimists do.
 
HIRE BRAD STEVENS
Pessimism vs reality are two different things. A 25 year record of horrible hires is reality. Dolson is now on the prove us wrong stage.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hornsby said:

We have limit ourselves because we don't dare touch guys like pearl or beard. We are to darn holy for them.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk
 

.....nothing wrong with not wanting to settle! Reach for the TOP, exhaust all options and then slowly work back down....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

I don't know what NBA GM's make but is it in the 10-12 million range?

A really big name can command that. Phil Jackson to the Knicks. Reilly was given ownership in the Heat. Rare. But that’s why in the previous post about leverage I said i didn’t know if he was quite at that level. 
 

Honestly, the best way for Stevens to get there if new ownership really wants him would be to leverage a huge IU offer and hold that over their heads. It would also explain why from the IU side there “appears “ to be interest again. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×