Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, TheWatShot said:

This is a sub-.500 Big Ten team. Sorry, but we're not good. 

.500 is highly aspirational. 
 

In our current form were a bottom 3 team in the league. If we find a good 6 man rotation that plays heavy minutes maybe 7th-8th place finish. Maybe. 

Posted
Just now, str8baller said:

.500 is highly aspirational. 
 

In our current form were a bottom 3 team in the league. If we find a good 6 man rotation that plays heavy minutes maybe 7th-8th place finish. Maybe. 

.... good thing it's November 16

Posted
2 minutes ago, str8baller said:

.500 is highly aspirational. 
 

In our current form were a bottom 3 team in the league. If we find a good 6 man rotation that plays heavy minutes maybe 7th-8th place finish. Maybe. 

I'm sure it's been discussed, but interested the general expectations for this team was. Still early, but I'm not sure these pieces fit too well together. Defensively this looks like it could be brutal

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...