Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, brumdog45 said:

I agree.  I understand that you don't know to win as many games against better competition to be the better team -- i.e, going 3-2 against quad 1 teams is better than 5-0 against quad 3 -- but IMO in the case of Michigan they were rewarded for simply playing good teams and losing.

That’s how I see it!

Posted
21 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

wonder why lol 

Yeah I think if any big draw team is anywhere near the cut line they would be sent to Dayton. 

But then there is Louisville last year so idk

Posted
1 hour ago, Uspshoosier said:

Did the lights go out on the tv broadcast? 
 

We had no lights for a minute and now they are flickering.   Wondering if they are showing that on tv 

Yes, and it really jacked up the TV broadcast. They admitted it and apologized, but sounded like they were all talking into a Pringles can at the end of Wright/Bryant. 

Posted
24 minutes ago, LIHoosier said:

They either took a little air out of the ball or are using the same ball from last night cuz everything that hits the rim tonight doesn't bounce a mile.

There was quite a bit of that ball going through the rim in the first half of the ND-RU game.

Posted

Pudge Harper shot the first three, surprised Pikiell didn't use his timeout left and instead Baker played hero ball.

If someone doesn't win in the 1st OT, its 50/50 the winner makes it to San Diego on time.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...