Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Class of '66 Old Fart

IUBB @ Northwestern - 02/08/22 @ 9:00 ET on BTN

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, HoosierAloha said:

I'm sure you've had similar experiences when one day you went from being all buddy buddy with your peers to having to take responsibility for their mistakes because you became their "boss" overnight. It sucks, there is an adjustment period, but when you ******* lead it's amazing how much easier it gets and the rewards that follow. The issue with this team is most would rather stay buddy buddy and talk about it than to put in the work to become that leader. Look at their "development" while in the program to see how willing they are to "develop" as leaders, but we've heard them talking about all that development. (another negative post, horrible non-fan and such)

I have no idea why you consider this to be a negative post. Reads like a 'means to a positive outcome' post to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, brumdog45 said:

The two guys I hope received the message were X and Tamar.  We can roll with a rotation of TJD, Race, Kopp, Galloway, X, JG, Leal and Tamar.

For Durr and Stewart, this was suspension #2 (although Durr wasn't officially suspended, the reality was that he was).  Lander had finally been given an opportunity to prove himself.  I'm not real high on guys that get a second chance and waste it.

One of Two things are going to happen from this.  Those that where suspended are going to grow some balls, man up, and play the rest of the season like their lives depend on it.  If so, we finish very strong.  OR, they’ll pout and look at the transfer portal as a way out and they’ll let the rest of the team down.  
 

And frankly, None of them are good enough to be a problem child.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

I believe the message was still being sent to the 5 players this morning around 4-5 AM. I hear stairs are fun to run at Assembly Hall.

For just the 5 -- or the entire team? 

I could understand both ways:

Making just the 5 run, because they're the ones who screwed up. 
Making the entire team run, because for 1) it's a team; for 2) the other 12 or so (particularly Race and Trayce -- the captains) should've made sure the 5 miscreants stayed in line, especially while facing such a critical game.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, HoosierAloha said:

I know I'm in the minority here but my hope is the team just shuts up. They've done enough talking this season and in previous seasons to realize it's just that. Actions, which there have been plenty of opportunities for since they arrived on campus, speak much louder than words. I recognize it's incredibly difficult to be a leader amongst peers at that age but it's amazing what can be accomplished when someone or a group actually does that. That's a culture thing and we've had players that have been around the program and losing enough that it should have happened by now.

Of course, which is why I said they need to get to proving it right then and there. And to be clear, I don't think anybody needs to address anything publicly. But within the locker room I would think something needs to be said. It's certainly admirable for their actions to speak louder than their words, but it sure would seem weird to me if I was one of the guys who played last night to not hear any acknowledgement of and apology for screwing up from those 5 teammates. And if I were one of the 5, I'd want to vocally own it and apologize (though a key part of my message would be to make it known that my actions will be speaking louder than these words). Maybe that's just me. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, southsidehoosier said:

Feel sorry for whatever coach or GA got up that early to supervise that

Again, just my opinion, I don't think I feel sorry for a coach, making north of $250k or GAs that want to progress to that level having to discipline players at 4-5 AM. Something I learned, in a much different line of work, is if you set expectations and hold them accountable early there is a lot less babysitting needed later. You might even be able to get a little more e and e out of them if you're doing that too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aren't Bates' parents ex-military? I know one or both or teachers of some sort now, but I thought they were ex military at one point in time.

If so...that makes Bates' behavior even more strange to me. He grew up in a disciplined family.

But then again, maybe he's a wild child like a preacher's daughter. Doesn't come across that way publicly, but you never know.

Hope this is a very good learning experience for all of them. Just hope Woody doesn't blink, and give PS & X their starting jobs back automatically.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, LamarCheeks said:

For just the 5 -- or the entire team? 

I could understand both ways:

Making just the 5 run, because they're the ones who screwed up. 
Making the entire team run, because for 1) it's a team; for 2) the other 12 or so (particularly Race and Trayce -- the captains) should've made sure the 5 miscreants stayed in line, particularly while facing such a critical game.  

Wooooo boy....I don't know about this one. What time could they realistically have gotten home? 2am Bloomington time? If coach had the 6 guys who played last night up at 4-5am running stairs at assembly, he better lift the suspensions b/c we likely have 3-4 more injuries now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, LamarCheeks said:

For just the 5 -- or the entire team? 

I could understand both ways:

Making just the 5 run, because they're the ones who screwed up. 
Making the entire team run, because for 1) it's a team; for 2) the other 12 or so (particularly Race and Trayce -- the captains) should've made sure the 5 miscreants stayed in line, particularly while facing such a critical game.  

My understanding is just the 5, but could be wrong. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, DWB said:

Aren't Bates' parents ex-military? I know one or both or teachers of some sort now, but I thought they were ex military at one point in time.

If so...that makes Bates' behavior even more strange to me. He grew up in a disciplined family.

But then again, maybe he's a wild child like a preacher's daughter. Doesn't come across that way publicly, but you never know.

Hope this is a very good learning experience for all of them. Just hope Woody doesn't blink, and give PS & X their starting jobs back automatically.

I believe it was X whose parents are retired military. Military parents doesn't equal disciplined children.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, HoosierAloha said:

Military parents doesn't equal disciplined children.

Not a 100% of the time, but more often than not. Parts of my family were in the military, and it's obvious from the behavior of their kids who was, and who wasn't military.

But even so....Bates has always come across as a level headed kid, with his act together. Did he just get caught up in the moment, or is it a pattern. We'll never know probably. I just was more surprised by him being one of the Fab 5.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, LamarCheeks said:

For just the 5 -- or the entire team? 

I could understand both ways:

Making just the 5 run, because they're the ones who screwed up. 
Making the entire team run, because for 1) it's a team; for 2) the other 12 or so (particularly Race and Trayce -- the captains) should've made sure the 5 miscreants stayed in line, especially while facing such a critical game.  

I would say the entire team, but the 5 have to run extra with the rest watching them until they are finished.  What better way to have each other start holding each other accountable than to have the entire participate?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, LamarCheeks said:

For just the 5 -- or the entire team? 

I could understand both ways:

Making just the 5 run, because they're the ones who screwed up. 
Making the entire team run, because for 1) it's a team; for 2) the other 12 or so (particularly Race and Trayce -- the captains) should've made sure the 5 miscreants stayed in line, especially while facing such a critical game.  

R lee Ermy, Full Metal Jacket when Pyle was caught with the Doughnut..

You eat it, they are going to pay for it... Drop and give me 100!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×