Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

JaybobHoosier

General Coach Candidate News

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, normandale97 said:

He doesn't want to be the GM. A GM is something he would want if he is even going to considered getting back into coaching. He hated recruiting at the end of his tenure at Butler. 

Yeah, I don't see the GM absolving the Head Coach of recruiting.  I see a true GM organizing a staff of player personnel people to review and monitor all college and HS players on their board.   The head coach would still get to decide what players he will want/need -- fit is still important.  GM will hand him a list and deal with the money.  Coach is still going to have to hit the gyms and schmooze the players.  But that's just my idea.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

I wonder if he considered himself to be asleep at the wheel as well.  It wasn't exactly a secret that he wasn't the most active guy in terms of coaching players during games.  Pretty much separated himself on the bench.

Maybe cause he was "iced out?"   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Golfman25 said:

Yeah, I don't see the GM absolving the Head Coach of recruiting.  I see a true GM organizing a staff of player personnel people to review and monitor all college and HS players on their board.   The head coach would still get to decide what players he will want/need -- fit is still important.  GM will hand him a list and deal with the money.  Coach is still going to have to hit the gyms and schmooze the players.  But that's just my idea.  

I think youre exactly right. The GM will help ease the load of recruiting and will manage the money. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, normandale97 said:

It's perfectly fine that Fife was let go. It was a bad matchup with Woodson and it was pretty obvious from the start it wasn't going to work out with those 2. But the smear campaign was complete bs. I don't blame it all on Woodson. It was an another assistant that was likely the one feeding Rabjohns the bs for his article. There is one guy on that staff that has no morals. 

I assume that’s Ya? He seems like a confrontational hot head

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, VFury said:

Something I hadn't thought of until now. There is a comparison to Ben McCollum, and it isn't Curt Cignetti. It's Bruce Pearl. Both spent years winning big at the D2 level, before going to the mid majors and winning there, before getting a P4 job and immediately winning. The comparison is there, just a matter of if McCollum is capable of the same jump.

Screenshot_20250213_144703_Firefox.jpg

Screenshot_20250213_153158_Firefox.jpg

If you are an athletic Director with one shot to bring back national relevancy to a blue blood program, I doubt he is in your top five or six. Would you be willing to bet millions of dollars in your salary on him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, IsaacTor said:

If for whatever reason something happens where we don't sign Brad but sign dusty I would probably respond with a FG post or a TD but missed extra points haha

Nah - Brad is a TD with successful 2 point conversion (or more if it were a rule).  Dusty is just a TD and traditional kick for the extra point. I REALLY hope it doesn't need to go beyond those options.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, FortWayneHoosier said:

I imagine his ending with the university has left a sour taste in his mouth. 

Now was it because of Woody? absolutely. 

Big question would be does he come back if Dusty does get the job because he almost thought about going to UM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, MrBBall said:

If you are an athletic Director with one shot to bring back national relevancy to a blue blood program, I doubt he is in your top five or six. Would you be willing to bet millions of dollars in your salary on him?

Louisville and Kentucky had to go down a level to get their coaches. We have to be prepared to do the same if everybody else says no.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Who is feeling sorry for him?  Seems everyone on here is pretty much in a agreement that he stunk as a head coach and needed to go 
He is feeling sorry for himself and probably his buddies he summoned to practice. Point is the smear campaign on fife wasn't necessary and karma often strikes back in the end.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Scotty R said:

He said you have to call him but nothing about if he would take it 

My thing is if all of this stuff is happening with Stevens then why has none of the national media caught wind of it. You would think a Rothstein or Goodman would be all over it.

Because they need an actual source to give them the scoop. They'd get laughed out of the profession if their source was "IU fans talking about it on message boards." 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Pagoda said:

Mmm… I wonder who all the pro-Woody burners get their info from…

My money would be on one of Woodson, Buckner, Ferguson or Zeke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TheWatShot said:

Because they need an actual source to give them the scoop. They'd get laughed out of the profession if their source was "IU fans talking about it on message boards." 

That is my point that a lot this Stevens stuff is just message board rumors and nothing more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, normandale97 said:

It's perfectly fine that Fife was let go. It was a bad matchup with Woodson and it was pretty obvious from the start it wasn't going to work out with those 2. But the smear campaign was complete bs. I don't blame it all on Woodson. It was an another assistant that was likely the one feeding Rabjohns the bs for his article. There is at least one guy, probably more, on that staff that has no morals. 

fixed that...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×