Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I don't get how a team like Gonzaga always ends up so highly seeded. They play a bunch of bullcrap teams in their bullcrap conference. The only other ranked team they play in conference usually is St Mary's which has, again, only beat up on bullcrap teams. Gonzaga did beat Ohio State earlier in the year (November) but the total resume is not any better than what Nebraska has done.
St Mary's will be an NCAA team (projected 8 seed that I've seen) and the only ranked opponent they've beaten is... Gonzaga.

Ap rankings mean nothing when it come to teams resumes if u compared Nebraska resume to Gonzaga it’s really not close in my opinion
Gonzaga Nebraska
4-2 Quad 1 0-6
2-2. Quad2. 4-2
37 Rpi. 51
131(non con 120) Sos. 93 (255 non con)
With the committees reveal of top 16 they showed that those quad 1 wins are very important and right now Nebraska doesn’t have any. The 1 point loss to Kansas early in the year might cost them a bid this year. A win in November means just the same as a win in February. Just my opinion


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
21 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:


Ap rankings mean nothing when it come to teams resumes if u compared Nebraska resume to Gonzaga it’s really not close in my opinion
Gonzaga Nebraska
4-2 Quad 1 0-6
2-2. Quad2. 4-2
37 Rpi. 51
131(non con 120) Sos. 93 (255 non con)
With the committees reveal of top 16 they showed that those quad 1 wins are very important and right now Nebraska doesn’t have any. The 1 point loss to Kansas early in the year might cost them a bid this year. A win in November means just the same as a win in February. Just my opinion


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Is there a site that shows the quad 1 wins? The only ones I saw from Gonzaga's schedule would be OSU and St Mary's - which, as you said is still better than Nebraska's 0-6.

Posted
Is there a site that shows the quad 1 wins? The only ones I saw from Gonzaga's schedule would be OSU and St Mary's - which, as you said is still better than Nebraska's 0-6.

http://warrennolan.com/basketball/2018/schedule/GonzagaWashington and Creighton would be the other quad 1 wins

 

http://warrennolan.com/basketball/2018/team-sheet?team=Gonzaga

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

 

 

Posted

I really wish we could have swept Illinois this year. Then we'd have a 6-game lead in the all-time series. Instead, it's 91-87. It was  hilarious a few years ago when it was tied and we only played at their place. The thought of saying they had a winning record against IU spun up all sorts of delusions of grandeur on Illinois boards. Then we won that game in front of the largest crowd they'd ever had for a home game along with the next three, and now they have to wait a few more years to finally pass us (hopefully a lot longer than that).

 

I only know our record against Illinois because it's so close, along with Purdue, because their fans make sure to somehow include it in their everyday vocabulary.

Posted

I'm not a fan of Nebraska, because I think their coach is a clown. Hopefully we leave no doubt and beat them at their place. I agree with USPS that they're not in. It seems like the big ten and SEC have swap this year. Big Ten is very Top heavy and the SEC is stronger top to bottom this year.

Posted
11 hours ago, Uspshoosier said:


Even if we won those 2 games IU would be in the same position as Nebraska is right now, a really good B1G record with 0 quadrant 1 wins (IU is 0-8). Beating Illinois and Wisky would of been just 2 more quadrant 3 wins. Now if IU would of won those 2 and they find a way to win the 2 quadrant 1 wins that are left on schedule then it could of gotten interesting


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

The one thing I dislike about the quadrant system: when we played ND they were quad 1 and then fell out do to a larger part - injury. I guess that would hold to how it was done before, but it's really highlighted with the new system.

This IU team is playing so much better on the defense end and I really don't think there are that many teams a lot better than us right now.

I'm just happy with our improvement.

Posted
19 minutes ago, JimBobJimmyBob said:

Photo of the "crowd" retweeted by ChronicHoosier.  This is f!@#ing pathetic by the students.

DWCiYl_VoAApD3K.jpg

Give them a good product and they will come.  Our last deep tourney run was 16 years ago.  Most of the students were still in diapers or close to it.

Posted
39 minutes ago, Ranger78 said:

I'm not a fan of Nebraska, because I think their coach is a clown. Hopefully we leave no doubt and beat them at their place. I agree with USPS that they're not in. It seems like the big ten and SEC have swap this year. Big Ten is very Top heavy and the SEC is stronger top to bottom this year.

I think there has only been one 11 win B1G team to ever miss out and never a 12 win team.  USPS may be right but I'll fall down if a 14-4 B1G team ever misses out.

Posted
2 minutes ago, dbmhoosier said:

I think there has only been one 11 win B1G team to ever miss out and never a 12 win team.  USPS may be right but I'll fall down if a 14-4 B1G team ever misses out.

I think it all depends on how they finish and how they do in the BTT. If they finish strong (win out) and win a solid BTT game, they should be in. Their overall resume is not solid right now. They haven't won any significant games.

Posted
1 minute ago, Ranger78 said:

I think it all depends on how they finish and how they do in the BTT. If they finish strong (win out) and win a solid BTT game, they should be in. Their overall resume is not solid right now. They haven't won any significant games.

I'm just saying if you go over .500 on the road in conference and undefeated at home you likely deserve a bid.  I don't care if the B1G is down.  That's not easy as we all should know.  We lost at freaking Illinois and Wisconsin. 

Posted
1 minute ago, dbmhoosier said:

I'm just saying if you go over .500 on the road in conference and undefeated at home you likely deserve a bid.  I don't care if the B1G is down.  That's not easy as we all should know.  We lost at freaking Illinois and Wisconsin. 

You might be right. The looses to WISC and ILL are part of the reason we're not going dancing. I get your points. I don't agree with you, but doesn't mean you're wrong and I don't think your opinion is off the wall crazy. They are close for sure, but I think they have more to do....

This year has been really crazy.

Posted
13 minutes ago, dbmhoosier said:

They have no tourney chance barring a miracle hence the apathy. 

I get that... and I'm looking through my eyes, which is a lot different than most of the students. I see a good coach and an improving product. The students see a team that's not going to the NCAA tournament. As a student right now, I would be there, but I'm sure that's not the same view of the current students. I get it. I just think this team deserves more than apathy from their fans.....

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...