Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Chris Nieman said:

I should have elaborated. I'm sold on Marshall after Brad Stevens and Billy Donovan. The guy can flat out coach. 

I should have elaborated. Good luck with that. Can't see that happening. And not interested in even discussing it.

Posted
1 minute ago, Chris Nieman said:

I should have elaborated. I'm sold on Marshall after Brad Stevens and Billy Donovan. The guy can flat out coach. 

30+ wins four out of the last five years, and at least one win in the NCAA Tournament four years in a row. Add all of that to his conference titles (regular season and conference), the guy is a great coach. I don't know how he'd recruit at IU, but he is a great coach. 

Posted
Just now, BGleas said:

30+ wins four out of the last five years, and at least one win in the NCAA Tournament four years in a row. Add all of that to his conference titles (regular season and conference), the guy is a great coach. I don't know how he'd recruit at IU, but he is a great coach. 

Thank you. Im not sure of the hostility with his name. I don't get it.

Posted
Just now, Chris Nieman said:

Thank you. Im not sure of the hostility with his name. I don't get it.

I don't get it either. I guess some think he's on the older side, or the Canada thing? If can't imagine anyone not supporting his coaching. 

Like you, I don't think he's on the Donovan/Stephens level, but he's as good as anyone else we're discussing after that. 

Posted
Just now, BGleas said:

I don't get it either. I guess some think he's on the older side, or the Canada thing? If can't imagine anyone not supporting his coaching. 

Like you, I don't think he's on the Donovan/Stephens level, but he's as good as anyone else we're discussing after that. 

His track record is amazing. As far as the canada thing, in my Navy career i've flipped sh*t for my guys safety so i kinda get it and i give him a free pass for that one.

Posted
1 minute ago, BGleas said:

I don't get it either. I guess some think he's on the older side, or the Canada thing? If can't imagine anyone not supporting his coaching. 

Like you, I don't think he's on the Donovan/Stephens level, but he's as good as anyone else we're discussing after that. 

I'm completely sold on his coaching.  He's not my top 1 or 2, that'd be Stevens and Donovan in order.  He wouldn't even be over Bennett for me.  For a 4th option or so, I'd be ecstatic.

Posted
Just now, JSHoosier said:

I'm completely sold on his coaching.  He's not my top 1 or 2, that'd be Stevens and Donovan in order.  He wouldn't even be over Bennett for me.  For a 4th option or so, I'd be ecstatic.

Thank you. I'd put he and Bennett as equal.

Posted

Archie coached a heck of a game too. Those two got played by the NCAA for having to play the first game against each other. WSU should have been at least a 5 or 6 seed. Nothing changes for me on Archie.

1. Stevens
2. Donovan
3. Bennett
4. Sean Miller
5. Archie/Marshall
6. Mike White
7. Alford/Enfield/Collins
8. Bryce Drew/Brad Underwood

Sent from my LGLS676 using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted
6 minutes ago, Chris Nieman said:

Thank you. I'd put he and Bennett as equal.

As I've said a few times, he is an absolutely undeniable upgrade over Crean and it's not a comparison.  The floor would be higher, I'm just not sure how high the ceiling would be.

Posted
Just now, JSHoosier said:

As I've said a few times, he is an absolutely undeniable upgrade over Crean and it's not a comparison.  The floor would be higher, I'm just not sure how high the ceiling would be.

Word. Word. You never know. I think that he is top 10 in college ball right now.

Posted
I don't get it either. I guess some think he's on the older side, or the Canada thing? If can't imagine anyone not supporting his coaching. 
Like you, I don't think he's on the Donovan/Stephens level, but he's as good as anyone else we're discussing after that. 

After having Crean, who was somewhat quirky, people "think" Marshall is his clone. I have even heard some argue his results are a clone of Creans because he lost early as a #1 seed.

He would be a great hire, after BS and BD and someday if he gets a chance at a bigger program may prove to be even better
Posted
Just now, 8bucks said:


After having Crean, who was somewhat quirky, people "think" Marshall is his clone. I have even heard some argue his results are a clone of Creans because he lost early as a #1 seed.

He would be a great hire, after BS and BD and someday if he gets a chance at a bigger program may prove to be even better

Yeah obviously i want Stevens or Donovan but Marshall is right up there.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...