Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

jdailey1981

TOM CREAN FIRED

Recommended Posts

I have asked Jeff Eisenberg and Jon Rothstein on twitter the last few days who IU could realistically get. I know it just media members but both these guys are very honest and I respect both their opinions. Consensus is Tony Bennett, Scott Drew whether people want him or not and Dana Altman are our top tier according to them and mentioned they all seem to want to stay put so Chris Mack or Archie Miller was the two names that were said to be the best that we could get right now. I want Archie Miller almost as bad as anyone else so it isn't disappointing for me but it may be for some of you. Also Few is considered a pipe dream in their opinion as well.

Sent from my LGLS676 using BtownBanners mobile app







Crean couldn't win the IHSAA 4A tournament.

Sent from my SM-G935P using BtownBanners mobile app




They also said trump could never win the election. You never know unless you try.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Yogi's Picnic Basket said:

I have asked Jeff Eisenberg and Jon Rothstein on twitter the last few days who IU could realistically get. I know it just media members but both these guys are very honest and I respect both their opinions. Consensus is Tony Bennett, Scott Drew whether people want him or not and Dana Altman are our top tier according to them and mentioned they all seem to want to stay put so Chris Mack or Archie Miller was the two names that were said to be the best that we could get right now. I want Archie Miller almost as bad as anyone else so it isn't disappointing for me but it may be for some of you. Also Few is considered a pipe dream in their opinion as well.

Sent from my LGLS676 using BtownBanners mobile app
 

don't see IU going anywhere near Drew after the way the Sampson tenure turned out. Maybe brother Bryce a year from now, though. Altman turns 59 this summer, so I doubt IU would be interested in him either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hoosier Guy said:

Stevens and Donovan are the absolute first calls. After that, Tony Bennett and Archie Miller

I'm not a Bennett fan.  There is a certain mold of defense first coaches/programs that produce really good in-season results, but flop in the post season.  Purdue, Wisconsin, Bennett (by way of his father at Wisky) at WSU and now Virginia. I realize that we crave D at IU, but in my humble opinion Bennett might swing us to far in that direction.  I don't want IU to settle for being the conference spoiler/boiler/badger, where success is measured by denying more talented teams of championships, versus winning them ourselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, triple said:

I'm not a Bennett fan.  There is a certain mold of defense first coaches/programs that produce really good in-season results, but flop in the post season.  Purdue, Wisconsin, Bennett (by way of his father at Wisky) at WSU and now Virginia. I realize that we crave D at IU, but in my humble opinion Bennett might swing us to far in that direction.  I don't want IU to settle for being the conference spoiler/boiler/badger, where success is measured by denying more talented teams of championships, versus winning them ourselves.

I agree with the point of this post, not sure I agree that Bennett is that but he could.  I think a lot of people are putting too much stock in this or that stat, this or that ken pom ranking, this or that metric.

I simply want a coach who coaches players up to or beyond their ability consistently, knows how to fit his system to the players he has, makes the in game adjustments needed, causes other teams to match up to us, and finally is consistently competing at the top of the conference and top 25 of the NCAA.

In other words, I want them to pass the eye test. 

This gives us a chance to make a run each year even if they get bounced earlier than they should occasionally.  Upsets will happen and the deep runs will even this out but at least to be consistently in the conversation each year will help ensure deeper runs happen more frequently.   The more frequent you can get deeper runs, the better chances at banner 6, 7 and 8.

Some of the stats being thrown around are great but give me the eye test over stats any day if I am forced to choose between the two.  Use both in conjunction and then you have something but I just feel too many people are using analytics in too much of a vacuum. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, triple said:

I'm not a Bennett fan.  There is a certain mold of defense first coaches/programs that produce really good in-season results, but flop in the post season.  Purdue, Wisconsin, Bennett (by way of his father at Wisky) at WSU and now Virginia. I realize that we crave D at IU, but in my humble opinion Bennett might swing us to far in that direction.  I don't want IU to settle for being the conference spoiler/boiler/badger, where success is measured by denying more talented teams of championships, versus winning them ourselves.

Virginia has flopped in the NCAA tournament. That is the biggest thing when it comes to NCAA basketball. There is nothing more important than the NCAA tournament. But I do think Tony Bennett would be a great hire. I think he's had a lot of success with average to above average players. At IU, he would get top notch players. And he would be able to recruit the hell out of this state. That would translate to postseason success imo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not a Bennett fan.  There is a certain mold of defense first coaches/programs that produce really good in-season results, but flop in the post season.  Purdue, Wisconsin, Bennett (by way of his father at Wisky) at WSU and now Virginia. I realize that we crave D at IU, but in my humble opinion Bennett might swing us to far in that direction.  I don't want IU to settle for being the conference spoiler/boiler/badger, where success is measured by denying more talented teams of championships, versus winning them ourselves.


I think it's good coaching doing what he has with the talent given. D is effort and energy and some coaching. Easier yield than offense. Give Wisconsin, Virginia, and heck, Painter (re:Swanigan) top end talent and the post season results might reflect better.

These schools consistently play against more talented teams. IU's platform should somewhat level the recruiting imbalance.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not a Bennett fan.  There is a certain mold of defense first coaches/programs that produce really good in-season results, but flop in the post season.  Purdue, Wisconsin, Bennett (by way of his father at Wisky) at WSU and now Virginia. I realize that we crave D at IU, but in my humble opinion Bennett might swing us to far in that direction.  I don't want IU to settle for being the conference spoiler/boiler/badger, where success is measured by denying more talented teams of championships, versus winning them ourselves.


Idk man I don't really crave D


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Always got to be mindful that there are plenty of people out there who would love to screw with our fanbase. Make sure the account is verified (blue and white check mark next to the name). Last month, somebody created a fake Adam Schefter twitter by spelling it "A-d-a-r-n" noting that the r and n bled together and looked like an m. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Virginia has flopped in the NCAA tournament. That is the biggest thing when it comes to NCAA basketball. There is nothing more important than the NCAA tournament. But I do think Tony Bennett would be a great hire. I think he's had a lot of success with average to above average players. At IU, he would get top notch players. And he would be able to recruit the hell out of this state. That would translate to postseason success imo

i personally wouldn't call losing to Izzo twice and boehiem last year as flopping in the tournament. I would call it a learning experience coaching against hall of famers. They controlled the game against Syracuse for a big chunk of that game. They picked a bad time to go cold and it cost them


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i personally wouldn't call losing to Izzo twice and boehiem last year as flopping in the tournament. I would call it a learning experience coaching against hall of famers. They controlled the game against Syracuse for a big chunk of that game. They picked a bad time to go cold and it cost them


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners


Creans loses are almost better. Calipari, Boeheim, Ol Roy aren't the easiest coaches to get by either.

Sent from my LGLS676 using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×