Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So if the receiver also dips his head it's a targeting call and the defensive player is ejected? I don't like that call. The defender wouldn't have been anywhere near hitting helmet to helmet if the receiver doesn't drop his head too.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Posted
It wasn’t PI on Stanford. And the way Oregon choked, they didn’t deserve to get the benefit of the doubt anyway. Great teams find ways to win. Props to Stanford

The first Oregon play in OT was pass interference by definition of the rule. Oregon did choke that game away though.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
44 minutes ago, Joe DeLow said:

Good thing is IU should be 4-1 after next week. No excuse we don’t put up 50. That is the perfect game really to just completely annihilate a team. Rutgers so far this season has given up 52 to Ohio State, 55 to Kansas and 42 to Buffalo. They haven’t scored more than two TD’sthey scores 14 points against Kansas) outside their game against Texas Southern.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

I agree but as far as yesterday eve.... THUD

Posted

In my opinion, Nebraska should be glad they play in the west division. Beat downs like they just got could happen with greater frequency. On the bright side, maybe they can get a win this coming weekend when they host Purdue. I'll be pulling for them.

Posted
On 9/23/2018 at 9:24 AM, Joe DeLow said:

Good thing is IU should be 4-1 after next week. No excuse we don’t put up 50. That is the perfect game really to just completely annihilate a team. Rutgers so far this season has given up 52 to Ohio State, 55 to Kansas and 42 to Buffalo. They haven’t scored more than two TD’sthey scores 14 points against Kansas) outside their game against Texas Southern.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

The opposite would also be true. Rutgers is due for a big game and IU teams of the past generally bow down to inferior opponents.  However, as I will be on hand for the game, I pray this doesn't occur. 

Posted

Clemson football QB Kelly Bryant says he will transfer

Kelly Bryant started the past 18 games for Clemson. He will start his next game for another school.

On Sunday, coach Dabo Swinney informed Bryant that he was no longer the starting quarterback. On Tuesday, Bryant informed Swinney that he will transfer.

Under new NCAA redshirt guidelines, by leaving Clemson now, Bryant can salvage his final year of eligibility. He has not decided where he will spend it.

Full story:   https://www.greenvilleonline.com/story/sports/college/clemson/2018/09/26/clemson-football-kelly-bryant-transfer/1427832002/

Posted
1 hour ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

Clemson football QB Kelly Bryant says he will transfer

Kelly Bryant started the past 18 games for Clemson. He will start his next game for another school.

On Sunday, coach Dabo Swinney informed Bryant that he was no longer the starting quarterback. On Tuesday, Bryant informed Swinney that he will transfer.

Under new NCAA redshirt guidelines, by leaving Clemson now, Bryant can salvage his final year of eligibility. He has not decided where he will spend it.

Full story:   https://www.greenvilleonline.com/story/sports/college/clemson/2018/09/26/clemson-football-kelly-bryant-transfer/1427832002/

Good. It is overdue. Watch Clemson with Bryant vs Clemson with Lawrence running the offense. There was zero chance they win the national title with Bryant. Not saying they have a great chance with Lawrence, but going forward past just this year it was the right decision. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Hardwood83 said:

Sadly, I think you are right. From what I've seen it will be a huge upset for Bama not to win it all. Especially since they don't even have to win their division/conference anymore. Even if Georgia or LSU manages to upset the Tide in the regular season or conference championship, they will get rewarded with having to play them again in the playoff. Barring an unimaginable melt-down Bama is going to be in the playoff. They have a golden ticket to get in because "everyone knows" they are one of the best 4 teams regardless of on-field results. It's happened at least 2x I can think of in the last several years. 

Alabama got in last year the way Ohio State did two years ago. The committee was consistent with that approach for both years. I still like the playoff much more than the BCS

Posted
3 hours ago, KingPG21 said:

Good. It is overdue. Watch Clemson with Bryant vs Clemson with Lawrence running the offense. There was zero chance they win the national title with Bryant. Not saying they have a great chance with Lawrence, but going forward past just this year it was the right decision. 

Trevor Lawrence is the real deal. Swinney made the right choice. With how Alabama is with Tua, Clemson had to match it. Lawrence is much closer to Tua than is Bryant

Posted
14 minutes ago, Hardwood83 said:

I agree the playoff is better but it's also hard to reconcile a NC that didn't even win their own division. It does diminish the regular season and even Conf championships if losing doesn't mean anything. I like the playoff at four teams, but fully expect it to expand (ruining it) because everyone deserves a chance. :120:

The difference though is that when Ohio State wrongfully got in, they got demolished. Alabama showed they belonged

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...