Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Purdue and Butler both prove that you can build a strong team with 4-year players, a solid system, players that follow it, and a complete team.  The truth is we didn't have any of those things with any kind of consistency for the past many years.  The key is to keep replenishing players and maintaining consistent recruiting.  This is one reason why I'm not hell bent on getting 5-stars.  Unless you bring in multiple 5-stars on a yearly basis you can be in perpetual rebuild mode without recruiting solid players to play with them.  I think Archie will do this, Tom Crean never did this.  As to Purdue, they sure seem to be clicking on all cylinders but they may be peaking too soon.

Posted
Purdue and Butler both prove that you can build a strong team with 4-year players, a solid system, players that follow it, and a complete team.  The truth is we didn't have any of those things with any kind of consistency for the past many years.  The key is to keep replenishing players and maintaining consistent recruiting.  This is one reason why I'm not hell bent on getting 5-stars.  Unless you bring in multiple 5-stars on a yearly basis you can be in perpetual rebuild mode without recruiting solid players to play with them.  I think Archie will do this, Tom Crean never did this.  As to Purdue, they sure seem to be clicking on all cylinders but they may be peaking too soon.

It takes a combination to win at the highest level. pu has a solid team led by four seniors that have improved their game every year. It's a good model but I don't think it's a model that will have you competing annually.

 

I believe you need the three and four year high 4* and low 5* players mixed with those other pieces. You need unselfish players that will wait their turn. (An example could be Anderson and Durham playing a very limited role next season if we were to land Romeo.) You absolutely need upperclassmen leadership that can teach the incoming freshmen.

 

pu's downfall in the tourney will be an athletic team that can defend the post 1v1 while pressuring their perimeter players. They're playing great basketball right now but I don't see them playing their best in March. The excuse this season will be the world games last summer.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted
Trae Young is just silly in this game.

Good for him.

I know we compare Langford to him and the home factor is the biggest reason but Trae is a different type of guy/player.

His mental toughness is the most impressive thing to me.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

He has shot it 36 times in this game. That’s crazy


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
1 minute ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Trae Young is just silly in this game.

Good for him.

I know we compare Langford to him and the home factor is the biggest reason but Trae is a different type of guy/player.

His mental toughness is the most impressive thing to me.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

He is good but he takes such ill advised shots at times. No one is Steph Curry

Posted
It takes a combination to win at the highest level. pu has a solid team led by four seniors that have improved their game every year. It's a good model but I don't think it's a model that will have you competing annually.
 
I believe you need the three and four year high 4* and low 5* players mixed with those other pieces. You need unselfish players that will wait their turn. (An example could be Anderson and Durham playing a very limited role next season if we were to land Romeo.) You absolutely need upperclassmen leadership that can teach the incoming freshmen.
 
pu's downfall in the tourney will be an athletic team that can defend the post 1v1 while pressuring their perimeter players. They're playing great basketball right now but I don't see them playing their best in March. The excuse this season will be the world games last summer.
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Hopefully IU can get some more 5 star players like Zeller, Yogi, the Grahams, Isaiah, et. al. along with high 4 star players. With a good coaching staff, that’s usually a winning combination.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted

Trae Young is the biggest chucker in the history of college basketball. I don't know how Kruger lets him shoot the ball almost 40 times, insane. Clearly extremely talented but that **** will not fly on an NBA team with other young players that need to be developed. 

Posted
Trae Young is the biggest chucker in the history of college basketball. I don't know how Kruger lets him shoot the ball almost 40 times, insane. Clearly extremely talented but that **** will not fly in the NBA. 

He is by far the best player on Oklahoma. The team is better with him shooting it a lot.

In the NBA he will have guys as good and better to work with. You will see more playmaking skills at that point.

It's like my sons game today. My son was gunning and hitting about 40%. He took about 15 shots. I said you need to get your teammates involved. And he did. And they went about 2/20. Sometimes having your best guy gunning is your only and best option.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted

He is by far the best player on Oklahoma. The team is better with him shooting it a lot.

In the NBA he will have guys as good and better to work with. You will see more playmaking skills at that point.

It's like my sons game today. My son was gunning and hitting about 40%. He took about 15 shots. I said you need to get your teammates involved. And he did. And they went about 2/20. Sometimes having your best guy gunning is your only and best option.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

14/39 is ugly though. So he has to tone it down but I think when he does it's still the same result for the team.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
34 minutes ago, HooHooHoo22 said:

What the hell is trae Young doing ?! Shooting 30 footers while only being down 2? He has 46 points on about 40 shots.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

 

36 to be exact, yet i watch him and i'm amazed and disgusted at the same time. if he could clean up his bad shots, the Sooners have the talent to make a big run in the tourney.

Posted
5 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:


14/39 is ugly though. So he has to tone it down but I think when he does it's still the same result for the team.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

was it 39, and i thought it was just 36. like i said, clean up the bad shots and they're good. to those who watched the game, how many bad shots do you think he took?? i say at least 12.

Posted
Trae Young is the biggest chucker in the history of college basketball. I don't know how Kruger lets him shoot the ball almost 40 times, insane. Clearly extremely talented but that **** will not fly on an NBA team with other young players that need to be developed. 

Honestly he is exactly Allen Iverson in college. AI wasn’t as good of a passer. They both had high turnover averages, but they are used exactly the same way from shot selection and expectation.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted

I think Trae's major issue is his turnovers and not his shot selection. His shot selection isn't the best but he was 50% chucking from deep. He gave OSU an easy 8 points off bad turnovers.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...