Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
44 minutes ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said:

That is the reality. Whether you like it or not. Has nothing to do with my rankings. This bMe continues as it is and guess where Kentucky will be? Joining Indiana. 

Kentucky will be joining Indiana? Pray tell where will Kentucky be joining Indiana at?

One team will be ranked the next week. One will not.

One team has quality wins. One does not.

One team believes in their coach and teammates. One does not.

One team will finish above .500 in a top three conference. The other? Maybe.

Posted
1 minute ago, Stuhoo said:

Kentucky will be joining Indiana? Pray tell where will Kentucky be joining Indiana at?

One team will be ranked the next week. One will not.

One team has quality wins. One does not.

One team believes in their coach and teammates. One does not.

One team will finish above .500 in a top three conference. The other? Maybe.

You talked about my rankings, and uli responded where Kentucky will be next week in my rankings. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said:

Yea I'd say otherwise. They are mediocre. At best. They really are just lucky the Big Ten can't officiate a game properly. They aren't that good. They weren't even good against us. Good teams play both sides of the ball if you can only do one, you're mediocre. 

Will gladly agree to disagree on this one.   you think they stink and I don’t especially at home.   

Posted
Just now, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said:

You talked about my rankings, and uli responded where Kentucky will be next week in my rankings. 

With all do respect but who cares about you rankings. You are not suppose to make it personal and be un bias when doing rankings.  It is obvious you are making it personal and can't look at things in an um bias manner.  

Posted
6 minutes ago, IU Scott said:

With all do respect but who cares about you rankings. You are not suppose to make it personal and be un bias when doing rankings.  It is obvious you are making it personal and can't look at things in an um bias manner.  

I'm literally as unbiased as possible. Kentucky was ranked for a reason. The AP having their rankings as they do makes sense. Rankings are a pretty simple concept. Losing is bad, winning is good. Some losses are not as bad as others, some wins aren't as good as others. Then you have all the moving pieces around that. I'm just one person. AP has like 60 people or something like that I think. I don't take it personal, but I have my reasons as to why teams have moved up and down as they have. Same for any voter in the AP. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...