Loaded Chicken Sandwich Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 UConn about to take down Houston. This should help us in a couple ways. Houston is the near the same seed line as us and makes our win vs UConn look a little better. Let’s see if it helps with our NET.Sent from my iPhone using BtownBannersPurdue will move up 5 lol. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app BGVille Hoosierfan, HoosierTrav, Uspshoosier and 1 other 4 Quote
Popular Post Uspshoosier Posted March 6, 2020 Popular Post Posted March 6, 2020 Someone needs to ask Lunardi on twitter if IU beats Wisky on Saturday will IU fall to the first 4 out Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners Loaded Chicken Sandwich, 8bucks, Hoosier Roots and 6 others 9 Quote
mdn82 Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 Worked for UNCStudent athletes getting paid though with court testimony. Their whole reasoning was the UNC thing was an academic issue. I will be happy to see how this turns out for certain schools.Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Quote
BGVille Hoosierfan Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 Someone needs to ask Lunardi on twitter if IU beats Wisky on Saturday will IU fall to the first 4 out Sent from my iPhone using BtownBannersOver the years he has risked his credibility by just trying to become another personality in sports media. He more or less is just trying to entertain and has now made his projections based on his views with a little shock value, as opposed to trying to truly guess how the committee will pick the field.Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app RatpigHoosier 1 Quote
JHoosier914 Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 Someone needs to ask Lunardi on twitter if IU beats Wisky on Saturday will IU fall to the first 4 out Sent from my iPhone using BtownBannersDoneSent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app mdn82, Loaded Chicken Sandwich and thebigweave 3 Quote
Loaded Chicken Sandwich Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 DoneSent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile appAnd I will note be finding this on Twitter and liking it. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app thebigweave 1 Quote
BGVille Hoosierfan Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 Pulling for Washington, Memphis, and Oregon State tonight! Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners Quote
Loaded Chicken Sandwich Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 And I will note be finding this on Twitter and liking it. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile appAnd found it, I believe. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Quote
Hovadipo Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 54 minutes ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said: How long of a time period? 2 years? 15 years? 20 years? And I’ll figure it out for you. Want me to do at large mid majors who are 9 seeds and lower? Teams from the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Big East, AAC, Pac12, SEC with what? 12, 13, 14 or 15 losses? Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Let’s go from the turn of the century. The other parameters seem fair. Those 7 conferences you listed with 12 or more losses vs everyone else 9 seeds and up. Should we set a minimum win number on those teams? My original post was referencing Lunardi saying a low major stacking wins against bad competition. Obviously going to have to go off of winning % either way, but I’d hope we can agree that some random 15-win low major that stumbled into a conference tourney title isn’t better than a 13-loss high major. That’s why I ask about a minimum number of wins. I really am curious to see how it shakes out. *For the record, I’d rather watch a high major team in the dance regardless of how this goes, but that’s strictly my opinion. Str8Hoosiers 1 Quote
rcbowla Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 Masks do not stop air-born particles. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile appSome will stop up to like 90% but you are correct they will not stop all Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk mdn82 1 Quote
HoosierAloha Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 Over the years he has risked his credibility by just trying to become another personality in sports media. He more or less is just trying to entertain and has now made his projections based on his views with a little shock value, as opposed to trying to truly guess how the committee will pick the field.Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile appIt gets people talking and clicks on their site. He has IU close because we have a massive following. It’s doo doo. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app BGVille Hoosierfan 1 Quote
Loaded Chicken Sandwich Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 Let’s go from the turn of the century. The other parameters seem fair. Those 7 conferences you listed with 12 or more losses vs everyone else 9 seeds and up. Should we set a minimum win number on those teams? My original post was referencing Lunardi saying a low major stacking wins against bad competition. Obviously going to have to go off of winning % either way, but I’d hope we can agree that some random 15-win low major that stumbled into a conference tourney title isn’t better than a 13-loss high major. That’s why I ask about a minimum number of wins. I really am curious to see how it shakes out. *For the record, I’d rather watch a high major team in the dance regardless of how this goes, but that’s strictly my opinion. I think most of your low major teams who got at larges as a 9 seed or lower will probably be around 20+ wins. I won’t look at any conference tourney champs since it would be teams getting at large bids vs the low major teams he would rather get bids over them. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Quote
Brass Cannon Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 35 minutes ago, mdn82 said: Student athletes getting paid though with court testimony. Their whole reasoning was the UNC thing was an academic issue. I will be happy to see how this turns out for certain schools. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Well the key was the classes weren’t just for athletes too. Wonder if adidas wants to give out 6 figures to a few random students to make this all go away. mdn82 1 Quote
Loaded Chicken Sandwich Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 Let’s go from the turn of the century. The other parameters seem fair. Those 7 conferences you listed with 12 or more losses vs everyone else 9 seeds and up. Should we set a minimum win number on those teams? My original post was referencing Lunardi saying a low major stacking wins against bad competition. Obviously going to have to go off of winning % either way, but I’d hope we can agree that some random 15-win low major that stumbled into a conference tourney title isn’t better than a 13-loss high major. That’s why I ask about a minimum number of wins. I really am curious to see how it shakes out. *For the record, I’d rather watch a high major team in the dance regardless of how this goes, but that’s strictly my opinion. I think most of the at large low majors who have gotten at large bids as a 9 seed and lower have had 20+ wins, but VCU may have had like 19 going in before their Fjnal Four Run. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Quote
Hovadipo Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 3 minutes ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said: I think most of the at large low majors who have gotten at large bids as a 9 seed and lower have had 20+ wins, but VCU may have had like 19 going in before their Fjnal Four Run. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app True. Any mid/low-major at-large should make it fair then. Although I do think a conference like the A-10 will sway it because I’m not sure I’d consider it a true mid-major. His specific example of ETSU, which I’d definitely consider a low major, is what sparked this. Loaded Chicken Sandwich 1 Quote
Loaded Chicken Sandwich Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 True. Any mid/low-major at-large should make it fair then. Although I do think a conference like the A-10 will sway it because I’m not sure I’d consider it a true mid-major. His specific example of ETSU, which I’d definitely consider a low major, is what sparked this. I’ve looked into it before. Most of those really good A-10 teams are higher seeded. There are some but most are higher seeded. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 Arizona State up 9 at home against Washington with 14 minutes left. Stanford losing by 6 to Oregon State with 11 minutes left. BGVille Hoosierfan 1 Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 Memphis up a 12 with 13 minutes left against Wichita State. BGVille Hoosierfan 1 Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 10-0 Washington run. Now down just 61-58 to Arizona State. BGVille Hoosierfan 1 Quote
mdn82 Posted March 6, 2020 Posted March 6, 2020 Well the key was the classes weren’t just for athletes too. Wonder if adidas wants to give out 6 figures to a few random students to make this all go away. Honestly nothing at this point would surprise me. Either way they move it will even the playing field. If they do nothing? It’s open season. If they put the hammer down? 50 consultants are brain storming the next way to play in the gray. These teams are just the sacrificial lamb until the next one.Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.