Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

BlueDevil

College Bball Thread

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

Could see them not making it to the sweet sixteen tbh

Especially if they get a tough matchup the first weekend. I was a little worried when it looked like they were going to get a 1 seed, but with their recent struggles that's not going to happen. Add that in with Painter usually not doing well in the tournament and I like the odds of them not getting to the sweet 16. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

B1G people downplay the B1G is bad talk.

But let's be honest, it's a bad in year the B1G. The terrible teams are less terrible. It's top heavy in Michigan St, Purdue, Michigan.

OSU is overrated.

Nebraska and Penn State are ok, maybe.

Rest is blah.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, TheWatShot said:

How many teams are in a quadrant? I never really got into the whole Quad 1 Quad 2 Quad 3 mumbo-jumbo.

 

Purdue has beaten 3 ranked teams all season. I'm pretty sure our 2013 team beat 3 ranked teams in a span of about 2 weeks.

I just googled it and found this. 

"Quadrant one wins are those home games vs. teams RPI ranked 1-30, neutral games vs. 1-50, and away games vs. 1–75. For example, a home win against a top 30 team would qualify as a quadrant one victory.

A Quadrant 2 win are those at Home against the RPI 31–75, neutral 51–100, and away victories over the RPI 76–135."

It seems pretty silly to me honestly. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I just googled it and found this. 
"Quadrant one wins are those home games vs. teams RPI ranked 1-30, neutral games vs. 1-50, and away games vs. 1–75. For example, a home win against a top 30 team would qualify as a quadrant one victory.
A Quadrant 2 win are those at Home against the RPI 31–75, neutral 51–100, and away victories over the RPI 76–135."
It seems pretty silly to me honestly. 

Makes sense to me in a math dork sort of way but I prefer the Eye test. Lol.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:


Makes sense to me in a math dork sort of way but I prefer the Eye test. Lol.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Yeah I feel like math people would love it haha. Who would even be the #75 team in the country? I'm trying to see how "meh" a team you can beat to get a quadrant 1 win. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How many teams are in a quadrant? I never really got into the whole Quad 1 Quad 2 Quad 3 mumbo-jumbo.
 
Purdue has beaten 3 ranked teams all season. I'm pretty sure our 2013 team beat 3 ranked teams in a span of about 2 weeks.

Committee has always used quadrants but this year they just redefine them and put more emphasis on neutral and road wins. Ranked teams have nothing to do with what the committee views as a quality win. Regardless of it you like the system or not quality of wins will be based on rpi. Until committee goes in a different direction this is what we got



Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Committee has always used quadrants but this year they just redefine them and put more emphasis on neutral and road wins. Ranked teams have nothing to do with what the committee views as a quality win. Regardless of it you like the system or not quality of wins will be based on rpi. Until committee goes in a different direction this is what we got

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

I’ve posted this a couple of times but here is a good article showing the difference between new and old system

https://www.ncaa.com/news/basketball-men/bracketiq/2018-02-15/ncaa-selection-committee-adjusts-team-sheets-emphasizing

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

pu will struggle in the tourney if C. Edwards struggles. They can go cold from deep and keep chucking. They can also turn it over and struggle to defend athletic teams. They're un athletic in 4 starting positions.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×