Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A) Nearly 80-85% of NBA players are egotistical and arrogant

 

B) LeBron gets absolutely mugged a majority of times he drives the lane and gets foul calls less frequently than he gets fouled. This is due to him being so physically strong.

 

C) Objectively....LeBron is the greatest all around basketball player I have ever seen play the game. Not the greatest scorer but the greatest player.

 

 

Sent from my Pixel XL using BtownBanners mobile app

 

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, rcs29 said:

A) Nearly 80-85% of NBA players are egotistical and arrogant

 

B) LeBron gets absolutely mugged a majority of times he drives the lane and gets foul calls less frequently than he gets fouled. This is due to him being so physically strong.

 

C) Objectively....LeBron is the greatest all around basketball player I have ever seen play the game. Not the greatest scorer but the greatest player.

 

 

Sent from my Pixel XL using BtownBanners mobile app

 

 

 

 

Just curious...  Do you believe he gets away with a lot of fouls too?

To me it's one way or the other, you either are the most physically gifted player to ever play the game or you're a flopper.  If you're going to throw dudes off you on backdowns and drives then don't flop.  Doing both just seems too dramatic for me... "I'm big and strong, Chris Paul threw me across the court..."  Doesn't calculate.

Posted
2 minutes ago, HoosierAloha said:

Just curious...  Do you believe he gets away with a lot of fouls too?

To me it's one way or the other, you either are the most physically gifted player to ever play the game or you're a flopper.  If you're going to throw dudes off you on backdowns and drives then don't flop.  Doing both just seems too dramatic for me... "I'm big and strong, Chris Paul threw me across the court..."  Doesn't calculate.

Without a doubt he’s a huge flopper and mega-complainer. I hate it. But with that being said, some of it is necessary. The gap between the calls Curry gets and the calls LeBron gets is staggering. So in that sense, I think it’s somewhat necessary to flop, but to a much less degree than what he’s already doing. 

Posted
1 hour ago, HoosierDYT said:

Without a doubt he’s a huge flopper and mega-complainer. I hate it. But with that being said, some of it is necessary. The gap between the calls Curry gets and the calls LeBron gets is staggering. So in that sense, I think it’s somewhat necessary to flop, but to a much less degree than what he’s already doing. 

All of the whining, crying and flopping are the reasons that I rarely watch any NBA game.  

Posted

Anyone else bummed by the finals matchup? Not sure the Cavs even get 1 win if LeBron even averages a triple double again. That’s why I said a few days ago it’s not good for the league 

Posted
7 hours ago, HoosierDYT said:

Anyone else bummed by the finals matchup? Not sure the Cavs even get 1 win if LeBron even averages a triple double again. That’s why I said a few days ago it’s not good for the league 

It sucks cause there isn’t a team in the East this year that could compete with the top few teams in the West.  In a few years Boston and Philly May be able to.  

Posted
17 minutes ago, mdn82 said:

It sucks cause there isn’t a team in the East this year that could compete with the top few teams in the West.  In a few years Boston and Philly May be able to.  

Correct. Boston - GS or Cleveland - Houston would have at least been different, however.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

Best team is relative since i doubt any of them could have won the finals. Id probably say the Pacers with Lance first time round

Derrick Rose MVP season (2011) was probably the best team. They also would have beaten the Mavs in the finals. 

Posted

The Cers with PG at his peak were very good. The Celtics and Pistons were always old but both formidable foes. Derrick Rose and the Bulls were great. The Hawks had some decent years as well.

Posted
1 hour ago, Brass Cannon said:

Best team is relative since i doubt any of them could have won the finals. Id probably say the Pacers with Lance first time round

I believe the message behind the question was "who have they really had to compete against in the East?"  There are a few teams that seemed to be pretty good but not great.  There might be a few outliers but I doubt the second place team in the East could have won the title in those years.  In the West over the past 10 or so years, the second place and sometimes third place teams could have competed for a title.  Meaning, the West has been much harder to make it out of than the East. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...