Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Banksyrules

Fire Coach Woodson Thread

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, OKHOOSIER said:

Today is getting weird in here because I definitely agree with you here lol. I’ll probably get skewered for this take but…..

While I do think it would be a slam dunk hire and would be thrilled, I do think there are some questions with BS. He hasn’t coached college in a decade and hasn’t coached at all in a minute. BS isn’t the grand slam home run he would have been after Crean anymore, more like a two run bomb with the potential to be a grand slam. Forgive me for my extended analogy lol

Completely agree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, AZ Hoosier said:

In the Gary Parrish video (above) they talked about May having turned down the Louisville job due to the "fishbowl" effect and mentioned that May might have passed on IU for the same reason... I know he's an alum, and he said that he wanted to coach here... but too much pressure? The inference was that Michigan was a football school, so less pressure... 

Not sure that I agree with them, but it's an interesting take on the situation. And I'd still take him in a heartbeat.

I am so sick of "the high expectations" and the "fans are the problem" bull crap. 

People act like it's rocket science.  It isn't.  Successful coaches have a handful of characteristics you can model.  Successful programs have the same.  Create a profile and follow it.  

The goals and expectations are simple -- it's a numbers game.  The more you make the tournament, the better your chances to advance.  So get yourself into the tournament as much as possible.  For the BIG10 that means what, top 7 or 8.  It's bonus if you're competing top 3 for the championship every few years.  But you have to get to the tourney.  Once you're in the tourney, you'll win some, you'll lose some.  Win 2 games and you're in the sweet 16.  1 more and you're "elite."  From there anything can happen.  You do it enough times with a level of consistency, the odds are in your favor to make the final 4 and beyond.  If you're not stumbling, bumbling, idiot as a coach you can get this done.  Heck, even Tom Crean was doing it -- just couldn't get over that hump.   :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, KathywithaC said:

So why did he publicly dismiss his interest in IU and any possibility that he’d take the job? Why not say “They made an incredibly generous offer and I love it there, but our family decided that this is the place for us”? Instead, we got the “Masshole” soliloquy, which was dismissive to both IU and IU fans.

I've been wholeheartedly unimpressed with your thoughts regarding Woodson. In fact, if those that you know within the administration share your thought process then I see where the problem is. 

First off, firing Woodson mid season, at this point, is anything but an "emotional/knee jerk reaction" as you put it. We're so beyond a "knee jerk" reaction from a time standpoint alone that it's humorous you even offered that up. We've seen 4 years of the same garbage/inability to coach at this level from this guy on top of the fact that he was wildly unqualified to hold a collegiate coaching position to begin with. His grandpa aura is a major turnoff for alot of recruits and his arrogance is the "turd in the punch bowl" for the fans witnessing his coaching shortcomings. 

Secondly, you labor under the misconception that fans want him gone because we think an interim will bring better results on the court. That couldn't be further from the truth. Nobody on that staff could be trusted to lift this roster into a winner, however, nobody on that staff has developed into the wart on this fanbase's @$$ like Woodson. Maybe Hill but that's only by association and the fact that he appears to be sleeping through this misery. This fanbase could take damn near anybody else's face at those press conferences and would be perfectly fine with a washed season at this point. Nobody is asking for CC or Hulls or Walsh to take over because they expect better results. They'll take anybody as long as it isn't Woodson just to get him off that sideline.

Finally, I don't care what the process "is". The process needs to think about changing and changing quickly. The optics are far worse if they keep him for the season and this dumpsterfire continues. If those in the administration are using terms/phrases like "knee jerk", "emotional reaction", or "it's not going to gain us immediately better results", then they need to grow a pair or leave. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Golfman25 said:

I am so sick of "the high expectations" and the "fans are the problem" bull crap. 

People act like it's rocket science.  It isn't.  Successful coaches have a handful of characteristics you can model.  Successful programs have the same.  Create a profile and follow it.  

The goals and expectations are simple -- it's a numbers game.  The more you make the tournament, the better your chances to advance.  So get yourself into the tournament as much as possible.  For the BIG10 that means what, top 7 or 8.  It's bonus if you're competing top 3 for the championship every few years.  But you have to get to the tourney.  Once you're in the tourney, you'll win some, you'll lose some.  Win 2 games and you're in the sweet 16.  1 more and you're "elite."  From there anything can happen.  You do it enough times with a level of consistency, the odds are in your favor to make the final 4 and beyond.  If you're not stumbling, bumbling, idiot as a coach you can get this done.  Heck, even Tom Crean was doing it -- just couldn't get over that hump.   :) 

Crean was a victim of the “high expectations,” Woody and Co. haven’t done enough to use that excuse. Making that excuse would imply you’re doing well enough that people should be less rabid. Crean getting canned a year after winning the B1G outright is an example of our program and fans believing Sweet Sixteens isn’t good enough.

Trying to slough off the fans while getting dog walked is pathetic. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, monskisprodigy said:

What was the take?

We shouldn’t fire Woodson. We are in danger of becoming Nebraska football.  Kornheiser wasn’t on board with his take. Said 35-32 in the B1G isn’t good enough and Tony is right. 
 

Sadly, I think we already are Nebraska football. 
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, hoosierbannerd said:

Agreed and I'm not trying to dog Woody but it would explain why he doesn't know player names, looks like "he's lost" on the sideline, can't make comments in pressers beyond the repeated cliches, etc. and perhaps QB knows and gives his buddy a final gift of this position??

If that was the case a pressure cooker job like IU would be less than ideal for him. And Buckner didn't do any favors for his friend or the program.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, bodsbums said:

PTI just led off the show with Woodson. Mike Wilbon had a terrible take as expected. 

I'm not surprised a Northwestern grad would want Woodson to remain the coach here, considering Woodson has yet to beat them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These guys don’t care.  It’s all about being in a club of status, money perks, benefits, financial stability/security and happiness.   Vacations, big homes, cars, wine, cigars, family, close friends, entertainment, going out to eat, parties, and the good life now and during retirement.

Distance afar is a winning cultural celebrated with integrity.  Truthfully that is what it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Hornsby said:

Probably would not be ay worse if he spent 1 million.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk
 

We got dog walked multiple times, and destroyed at home, this year with 6m in NIL. Imagine assembling a roster with 1/6th of that, with Mike Woodson coaching... I'm confident it would in fact be worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, IndianaSconnie90 said:

I've been wholeheartedly unimpressed with your thoughts regarding Woodson. In fact, if those that you know within the administration share your thought process then I see where the problem is. 

First off, firing Woodson mid season, at this point, is anything but an "emotional/knee jerk reaction" as you put it. We're so beyond a "knee jerk" reaction from a time standpoint alone that it's humorous you even offered that up. We've seen 4 years of the same garbage/inability to coach at this level from this guy on top of the fact that he was wildly unqualified to hold a collegiate coaching position to begin with. His grandpa aura is a major turnoff for alot of recruits and his arrogance is the "turd in the punch bowl" for the fans witnessing his coaching shortcomings. 

Secondly, you labor under the misconception that fans want him gone because we think an interim will bring better results on the court. That couldn't be further from the truth. Nobody on that staff could be trusted to lift this roster into a winner, however, nobody on that staff has developed into the wart on this fanbase's @$$ like Woodson. Maybe Hill but that's only by association and the fact that he appears to be sleeping through this misery. This fanbase could take damn near anybody else's face at those press conferences and would be perfectly fine with a washed season at this point. Nobody is asking for CC or Hulls or Walsh to take over because they expect better results. They'll take anybody as long as it isn't Woodson just to get him off that sideline.

Finally, I don't care what the process "is". The process needs to think about changing and changing quickly. The optics are far worse if they keep him for the season and this dumpsterfire continues. If those in the administration are using terms/phrases like "knee jerk", "emotional reaction", or "it's not going to gain us immediately better results", then they need to grow a pair or leave. 

They’re too stupid to understand.  They admit that the process hasn’t worked for 25 years but also state that they must stick with the process.  It is mind boggling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×