Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

monskisprodigy

Injury Updates

Recommended Posts

I'm assuming that all NCAA programs are following something close to this with their concussion protocol and return to play.

 

https://www.playsmartplaysafe.com/focus-on-safety/protecting-players/nfl-return-to-participation-protocol/

 

Not all trainers at the HS, club sport level etc have been trained in concussion protocol.  Whomever referenced a player who took a hit to the head and then returned to play that same game is just uneducated.  Not all concussion symptoms show up immediately.  I know people who had a blow to the head, passed all of the neurological tests on the field given by a certified trainer, and  were cleared to return to play.  Then showed signs of a concussion the next morning.  Their return to play time was increased significantly by them returning to play that game.  

 

The issues with concussion protocol is that the athlete needs to be honest about minor symptoms.  Major symptoms like sensitivity to noise and light are difficult to hide as are major headaches.  Brain fogginess, slight headaches, tiredness, etc are easy to hide especially if an athlete is bound and determined to return to play as quickly as possible (which I would imagine is 99% of all Division 1 athletes)

 

Let the doctors and trainers do their jobs without second guessing them or complaining about how "cautious" IU's medical staff is.  

Here's some info from the Mayo Clinic website regarding concussions and that delayed symptoms are not uncommon.  

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/concussion/symptoms-causes/syc-20355594

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

So you literally have nothing but antecdotal evidence and yet strongly suspect Rob is just fine. 

Yep that is exactly the case. No point in discussing any further. Your opinion is what it is and so is mine. And neither of us is going to change the other....

Have you examined the players and their brains? What makes you the expert? Oh wait you are just going off others evidence... it is easy to  pick and choose who to believe to support your side, there is plenty of research on both sides but as long as you only introduce the stuff that supports your opinion then it is right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Str8Hoosiers said:

Yep that is exactly the case. No point in discussing any further. Your opinion is what it is and so is mine. And neither of us is going to change the other....

Have you examined the players and their brains? What makes you the expert? Oh wait you are just going off others evidence... it is easy to  pick and choose who to believe to support your side, there is plenty of research on both sides but as long as you only introduce the stuff that supports your opinion then it is right.

His evidence is what IU is doing per the team doctors. Yours is just your armchair opinion.

Just because one side has good sources and the other has bad sources doesn't mean that someone is being one sided.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Str8Hoosiers said:

I have seen MANY cases of somebody being diagnosed with a concussion and then later told the diagnosis was wrong and they NEVER actually had a concussion. I have heard stories from others on the testing procedures and how it is not a true baseline (see others posts above as additional examples).

I personally am NOT qualified to make any diagnosis and I am not making a diagnosis. i am saying the ones that are could be wrong. And even the medical Professionals and experts don't agree on the subject at all. Once you put the strict protocols in place that IU has apparently done then it no longer matters what a doctor says... the protocols overwrite the doctors opinions or diagnosis.

Concussions are primarily diagnosed by symptoms.  If someone was diagnosed with a concussion there MUST have been a symptom there.  Maybe it was a very mild concussion and the symptoms disappeared by the next morning. Just because the symptoms went away quickly that doesn't mean they weren't concussed.  

There is ZERO way to determine you didn't have a concussion post injury.  I find it very hard to believe that medical personnel saw symptoms, diagnosed a concussion then later changed their diagnosis.  That just doesn't add up!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know I’m a hard headed (dumb) athlete but I’d have to have super severe migraines, photosensitivity, or memory loss to keep me from playing the next possible game.

 

I was indeed knocked unconscious in a hockey game and played the rest of that game and the following games. No major symptoms.

 

But I am built that way. Dumb and strong.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, iuhoosierfan90 said:

Concussions are primarily diagnosed by symptoms.  If someone was diagnosed with a concussion there MUST have been a symptom there.  Maybe it was a very mild concussion and the symptoms disappeared by the next morning. Just because the symptoms went away quickly that doesn't mean they weren't concussed.  

There is ZERO way to determine you didn't have a concussion post injury.  I find it very hard to believe that medical personnel saw symptoms, diagnosed a concussion then later changed their diagnosis.  That just doesn't add up!

 

If you get hit in the head there is a good chance it will hurt, you may see blurry, you may have a headache.... that doesn't mean it is a concussion. Of course there are symptoms after taking a shot to the head... that is my point... just because it hurts doesn't mean it is a long term thing. And then when doing more test everything shows up fine... so could it be a concussion that immediately healed? possible... or could the original diagnosis of a concussion have been wrong? Again possible... 

The protocol and the test are exactly that. Trying to determine if you did or did not have a concussion post injury.

If there is ZERO way to determine you didn't have a concussion post injury then everybody DOES have a concussion everytime they are tested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I know I’m a hard headed (dumb) athlete but I’d have to have super severe migraines, photosensitivity, or memory loss to keep me from playing the next possible game.
 
I was indeed knocked unconscious in a hockey game and played the rest of that game and the following games. No major symptoms.
 
But I am built that way. Dumb and strong.
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners
 

This being said, I will never ever doubt someone following doctors orders and trying to do what is right for themselves.

I am a gambler with my health probably. But to me the body is incredibly resilient and I think it takes a plethora of head trauma to produce this CTE stuff and I don’t think the odds of head trauma in basketball is very high. I’d take my chances unless my performance was bad enough to hurt my team.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I haven't seen a single person on here say that they care more about winning games than the players' well-being, or even say anything that would imply that. 

So is that why a poster directly above this post, say we needed Rob bad? To me that implies winning is more important. While I agree we have a better chance with Rob, if the staff is cautious i have no problems.

 

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is the problem... the testing...
The baseline. The protocol... 
You say he was clear tested and has 1, but by everything I have seen he clearly doesn't have 1... but because some test or some baseline in some test that isn't perfected says so then he is out.
Links to what you've seen?

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It could be that IU decided to be overly cautious because of the player safety issues we had under Coach Wilson. Heck, maybe we're not actually being overly cautious, other schools and pro leagues might not be cautious enough, making it look like we're overly cautious when we're doing what we're supposed to do. I really don't know. Whatever the reality is, I just hope Rob can get healthy and cleared soon. 
This is entirely possible. If so, erring on the side of a players future costs us a game or 2, so be it. It is after all, just a game that doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, woodenshoemanHoosierfan said:

So is that why a poster directly above this post, say we needed Rob bad? To me that implies winning is more important. While I agree we have a better chance with Rob, if the staff is cautious i have no problems.

 

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

I don't know their intent, but after the game Green had last night, someone saying we need Rob bad is just a statement of fact to me. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, woodenshoemanHoosierfan said:

So is that why a poster directly above this post, say we needed Rob bad? To me that implies winning is more important. While I agree we have a better chance with Rob, if the staff is cautious i have no problems.

 

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

I texted someone during the game that we need Phinisee back bad.  That's not saying his health is less is important, it's just a statement of fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, Tim Garl’s got this. You don’t think Archie and Co want Phin back? Relax, no one here actually knows what they’re talking about. Rob’s head might have hit much harder than we thought.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have heard people say this before. Do you actually believe this will happen?
There is no chance, there is always somebody willing to take the risks.... there are a lot of people in really bad situations and the only way out is through sports... ANYTHING literally ANY RISK is worth the reward of being able to get out of those type of situations.
Yes i believe it with famalies in suburbs, etc. You will have 1/4 of the kids you have in youth sports now.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bailey7878 said:

Yes i believe it with famalies in suburbs, etc. You will have 1/4 of the kids you have in youth sports now.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
 

I 100% agree that participation in youth sports is and will continue to decline through a myriad of factors.

However I do believe that there are still more than enough that decide the risk is worth the reward and overall we will not see a change in high level athletics. There will still be an NFL, NHL, NBA, NCAA etc.... And as long as there are enough people willing to take that risk those organizations aren't going to make sweeping changes that effect their own bottom line negatively.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Archie's post game comments about Rob: 
 

Based on Miller’s postgame comments, it sounds like the earliest Phinisee could return is next Friday at Maryland.

“I doubt he plays at Michigan. I would take that off the table,” Miller said. “Today (Thursday) was the first day that Rob smiled in a long time, so I know he’s feeling better. He’s been doing cardio work. He’s been doing some shooting. That’s about it. And as he doesn’t have any be problems or setbacks, they keep letting him do more.

“But today was the first time — at shoot around today was the first time I saw him where he was smiling. He had a really good way about him. So I think that’s probably the first step in understanding he’s feeling better.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I 100% agree that participation in youth sports is and will continue to decline through a myriad of factors.
However I do believe that there are still more than enough that decide the risk is worth the reward and overall we will not see a change in high level athletics. There will still be an NFL, NHL, NBA, NCAA etc.... And as long as there are enough people willing to take that risk those organizations aren't going to make sweeping changes that effect their own bottom line negatively.
Lower income families sure but not ones well off.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Archie's post game comments about Rob: 
 

Based on Miller’s postgame comments, it sounds like the earliest Phinisee could return is next Friday at Maryland.

“I doubt he plays at Michigan. I would take that off the table,” Miller said. “Today (Thursday) was the first day that Rob smiled in a long time, so I know he’s feeling better. He’s been doing cardio work. He’s been doing some shooting. That’s about it. And as he doesn’t have any be problems or setbacks, they keep letting him do more.

“But today was the first time — at shoot around today was the first time I saw him where he was smiling. He had a really good way about him. So I think that’s probably the first step in understanding he’s feeling better.”


As the captain of the “read into things too much police”, Rob did seem distant looking on the bench when they would zoom in on him. Like he was distracted or thinking about other things.

I know I know.




Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×