Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
He still have to guard someone. Scheme wise that's irrelevant from the offensive end to the defensive. He can't guard Morgan.. he'd struggle with Smith. Fitzner would stretch him out too much 

And they would have to guard him too. Would any of them be able to stop him? He might not be able to guard those players but you could sag him off of McRoberts to clog the lane. Heck, you could sag him off Morgan or Smith and help from the side. There are ways to scheme it. In Archie's system it doesn't work.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted

Oh my goodness! I remember my dad going crazy (and not in a good way) when Mandeville and Eggers were in the game. I honest to goodness forgot all about Robbie Eggers lol. I know this is off topic but if I remember correctly, wasn’t Mandeville pretty highly sought after?


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Yes Mandeville made like top 20 at nike camp and ended up being a bust. Eggers was just awful.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

Posted
He still have to guard someone. Scheme wise that's irrelevant from the offensive end to the defensive. He can't guard Morgan.. he'd struggle with Smith. Fitzner would stretch him out too much 

in a lineup where we roll out Morgan and Smith as our 4 and 5 we will get eaten alive by a good post player like haas, biggie, Davis etc as there isn’t anyone that can defend the post

All about the scheme and how you hide deficiencies, not Team is going to have everything covered


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
1 hour ago, HoosierAloha said:


And they would have to guard him too. Would any of them be able to stop him? He might not be able to guard those players but you could sag him off of McRoberts to clog the lane. Heck, you could sag him off Morgan or Smith and help from the side. There are ways to scheme it. In Archie's system it doesn't work.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

 They would guard him significantly better then he could guard them. 

Posted
54 minutes ago, MikeRoberts said:


in a lineup where we roll out Morgan and Smith as our 4 and 5 we will get eaten alive by a good post player like haas, biggie, Davis etc as there isn’t anyone that can defend the post

All about the scheme and how you hide deficiencies, not Team is going to have everything covered


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

 Davis is not comparable to those two. I'm honestly not worried at all about defending the lost with Smith and Morgan starting. A lot more worried about devonte. 

Posted
57 minutes ago, MikeRoberts said:


in a lineup where we roll out Morgan and Smith as our 4 and 5 we will get eaten alive by a good post player like haas, biggie, Davis etc as there isn’t anyone that can defend the post

All about the scheme and how you hide deficiencies, not Team is going to have everything covered


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Yes, there are outlier teams that still play traditional bigs, but they’re much less common. I’m watching the NBA playoffs and I’m not sure there’s a single traditional, post-up big on any team still playing. 

Look at the Final Four, I think Kansas was the only team with a traditional big and Villanova exploited the heck out him with Spellman playing the perimeter bombing threes. Kansas’ big couldn’t get out on him and Spellman exploited it so much  

I don’t think Davis, even pre-injury, is good enough to warrant Archie changing the system. Davis and Morgan also just aren’t a good match, unless Morgan can significantly increase his 3-pt percentage. Morgan is best when operating in the paint, and having Davis there clogs everything for him. 

Posted
Yes, there are outlier teams that still play traditional bigs, but they’re much less common. I’m watching the NBA playoffs and I’m not sure there’s a single traditional, post-up big on any team still playing. 
Look at the Final Four, I think Kansas was the only team with a traditional big and Villanova exploited the heck out him with Spellman playing the perimeter bombing threes. Kansas’ big couldn’t get out on him and Spellman exploited it so much  
I don’t think Davis, even pre-injury, is good enough to warrant Archie changing the system. Davis and Morgan also just aren’t a good match, unless Morgan can significantly increase his 3-pt percentage. Morgan is best when operating in the paint, and having Davis there clogs everything for him. 

It was just a year ago we watched two monsters hold down the middle in the championship game karnowski vs meeks. Those guys created fits for teams that did not have a big that could defend them and their coaches were smart enough to know how to use them properly

All about schemes and players understanding their roles. these types of players are still relevant and impactful in the game, more so college but that is what we are talking about


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
 They would guard him significantly better then he could guard them. 

None of those guys are going to stop him 1v1. Bring a double and he can kick it to a shooter. You can sag off on ball screens and help from weakside with Davis as your big. It's not perfect but it can work, especially if you have a wing like McRoberts that Davis could defend.

I agree that the game has moved away from a traditional plodding, back to the basket, big. However, if Morgan is our primary 5 for the entire season we'll struggle.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
3 minutes ago, HoosierAloha said:


None of those guys are going to stop him 1v1. Bring a double and he can kick it to a shooter. You can sag off on ball screens and help from weakside with Davis as your big. It's not perfect but it can work, especially if you have a wing like McRoberts that Davis could defend.

I agree that the game has moved away from a traditional plodding, back to the basket, big. However, if Morgan is our primary 5 for the entire season we'll struggle.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

One reason why i Fitzner might have a chance. Fills a key need on both sides of the ball. Nobody can fill both those needs

Posted
21 minutes ago, HoosierAloha said:


None of those guys are going to stop him 1v1. Bring a double and he can kick it to a shooter. You can sag off on ball screens and help from weakside with Davis as your big. It's not perfect but it can work, especially if you have a wing like McRoberts that Davis could defend.

I agree that the game has moved away from a traditional plodding, back to the basket, big. However, if Morgan is our primary 5 for the entire season we'll struggle.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

I don't think we'll struggle at all. You're way over selling Davis. McRoberts can still shoot so idk what you keep bringing him up for? Also.. do any good teams have players you can just sag off? 

And honestly I really don't care what other teams Davis would work with. He doesn't for us. 

No one will ever double Davis. No need. He can't beat those 3 1v1 regularly. Just not good enough. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, MikeRoberts said:


He did just fine against Duke, in fact one could argue he was the most impactful player on the court. He has all the tools when healthy to be force. He played hurt for a while and then sat out the rest of his sophomore season. He is young and been injured...


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

One game. IPFW and ISU he could barely play because of the style of play. One solid game does nothing for me. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, brumdog45 said:

I think people are being waaaaayyyyy too polarizing on Davis.  

Agreed, it takes many pieces in most cases.  Davis is another asset that can help win games.  I don't think we'll see players like him at IU again under Archie but if you have them why not use them. 

My concern more is Morgan making it through an entire season as the primary 5.  He hasn't had to do that and wore down last season as the 4.  Langford and more talent around him will help but we'll need someone to take on bigger teams bigs. 

Posted
One game. IPFW and ISU he could barely play because of the style of play. One solid game does nothing for me. 

I would blame that on defense of our guards rather than him. If we don't get behind that quick we don't have to try to shoot our way out of it. If we are as good as we should be then we need to make other teams switch to our style and pace not the other way around.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
45 minutes ago, BtownBanner6 said:


I would blame that on defense of our guards rather than him. If we don't get behind that quick we don't have to try to shoot our way out of it. If we are as good as we should be then we need to make other teams switch to our style and pace not the other way around.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

We don't want to play at a slow pace either. If we did, I can promise we wouldn't have gotten Romeo. Pace and space people. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...