Welcome Coach Miller

[HoosierSadaseci]

2 hours ago, G8trs said:

You have no point except that youre just another moron with a stupid opinion.Have a great day.

Hmmm.  Looks like a troll.  Sounds like a troll.  Smells like a troll.  Must be a troll.  I'm guessing you'll be butt hurt when Billy Donovan is announced as IU's next coach.

[Old Friend]

2 minutes ago, Walking Boot of Doom said:

Is covering up sexual assault part of Indiana's culture?

Hhmm....   I'm not sure that's exactly what happened.  You might want to research that.

[Old Friend]

1 minute ago, Alford Bailey said:

I think his resume is everything. I see talented teams stumbling in the sweet sixteen. Maybe he makes a run this year and proves me wrong.

I disagree.  I think he's a very different coach here than he would be anywhere else.  Bill Belichick was awful with the Browns.  For example.

[Walking Boot of Doom]

Just now, Old Friend said:

Hhmm....   I'm not sure that's exactly what happened.  You might want to research that.

Defended Pierre Pierce adamantly and his close friend and priest conveniently met with the victim. Answer honestly, are you comfortable with that kind of person coaching at Indiana? If so, we have nothing further to discuss. I don't understand how many here can get so indignant about other programs not doing things the "right way", and then in the same breath call Alford as the savior of the program.

[SteelerHoosier]

15 minutes ago, Old Friend said:

Keep in mind fellas....Alford at Indiana is a very different hire and coach than Alford at Iowa or anywhere else.  The "fit" matters; and he's been able to consistently recruit Indiana kids no matter where he's been.  Just food for thought, as I know he's not a popular choice.  I don't think his resume matters much.  He'd be FAR better at Indiana than either Miller brother or Billy Donovan; and I simply do not understand the love affair with Donovan.  I know he has a great resume, but he's not (in my mind) a fit at Indiana.   This place is still unique and has its own culture.  He and that culture don't mix..

That resume fits anywhere 

[HoosierSadaseci]

2 hours ago, Walking Boot of Doom said:

I don't have the exact quote, but yesterday Glass said something about presenting the next head coach with a pool of assistants they can select from. Can someone clarify if I'm off on this?

That said, who are the assistants you most like to see at Indiana? Given the speculation regarding their future head coaching abilities, I want Dane Fife and Calbert Cheaney on the bench.

It was in regards to the money pool for assistants, meaning the assistant coaches will get paid.

[Brass Cannon]

20 minutes ago, Old Friend said:

Keep in mind fellas....Alford at Indiana is a very different hire and coach than Alford at Iowa or anywhere else.  The "fit" matters; and he's been able to consistently recruit Indiana kids no matter where he's been.  Just food for thought, as I know he's not a popular choice.  I don't think his resume matters much.  He'd be FAR better at Indiana than either Miller brother or Billy Donovan; and I simply do not understand the love affair with Donovan.  I know he has a great resume, but he's not (in my mind) a fit at Indiana.   This place is still unique and has its own culture.  He and that culture don't mix..

If you are saying a two time NCAA champ doesn't fit Indianas culture I think that might be part of our problem.  

[Tom White]

Trying to think outside the current list. How about someone like Oregon coach Dana Altman? He's been pretty darn good.

[8bucks]

Hhmm....   I'm not sure that's exactly what happened.  You might want to research that.

That article MDN posted says differently. I would love to be convinced otherwise but that article and a poor apology after he accepted the UCLA job suggest some truth to it. If you have something that counters MDNs article please post as I would love to see a differing summary

[Walking Boot of Doom]

2 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

If you are saying a two time NCAA champ doesn't fit Indianas culture I think that might be part of our problem.  

No, you don't understand. Our culture over the past 30 years has become mediocrity and early tournament exits. Alford is perfect.

[Old Friend]

11 minutes ago, Walking Boot of Doom said:

Defended Pierre Pierce adamantly and his close friend and priest conveniently met with the victim. Answer honestly, are you comfortable with that kind of person coaching at Indiana? If so, we have nothing further to discuss. I don't understand how many here can get so indignant about other programs not doing things the "right way", and then in the same breath call Alford as the savior of the program.

Defended before he knew facts is VERY different than "covered up."  Come on...get real.  As soon as the facts came out, he issued a very public and very sincere apology for saying what he did; and he's just a coach who defended a player.  Covered up?   No.  That did not happen.

[KingPG21]

4 minutes ago, Tom White said:

Trying to think outside the current list. How about someone like Oregon coach Dana Altman? He's been pretty darn good.

I think most complaints are his age, and that he probably won't be good enough to get use a national title, which so far kind of look valid. Though he has never had the same resources he'd have if he were here. 

[Old Friend]

6 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

If you are saying a two time NCAA champ doesn't fit Indianas culture I think that might be part of our problem.  

No.  That's not what I' saying.  John Calipari has national championships, too.  Do you want him?    Let's keep things in context.

[KingPG21]

Just now, Old Friend said:

Defended before he knew facts is VERY different than "covered up."  Come on...get real.  As soon as the facts came out, he issued a very public and very sincere apology for saying what he did; and he's just a coach who defended a player.  Covered up?   No.  That did not happen.

Sincere? You mean the one that was almost universally panned for being insincere? 

[the possum]

If I were to make up the list there would only be four names on it. 

Brad Stevens

Billy Donovan

Bennett

Alford

 

[Brass Cannon]

Just now, Old Friend said:

No.  That's not what I' saying.  John Calipari has national championships, too.  Do you want him?    Let's keep things in context.

Before Alford, Yes.  But Billy and Calipari are so very different.  

[Old Friend]

1 minute ago, KingPG21 said:

Sincere? You mean the one that was almost universally panned for being insincere? 

I'm speaking of this one, and I don't know that it was panned.  If you guys think BD is a better fit than Alford would be, I respectfully disagree with you, but I'm done with the back and forth over hypotheticals.  I do laugh at the people who think they have sources that say it's absolutely BD.     http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaab/2013/04/11/ucla-steve-alford-sexual-assault-pierce-iowa-2002/2074995/

[Walking Boot of Doom]

Defended before he knew facts is VERY different than "covered up."  Come on...get real.  As soon as the facts came out, he issued a very public and very sincere apology for saying what he did; and he's just a coach who defended a player.  Covered up?   No.  That did not happen.

Did you read the report issued by the president of UI? The one that explicitly stated an individual with connections to Alford met with the victim to discuss her decision on whether or not to press charges? I suggest you do some more research.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

[Old Friend]

1 minute ago, Brass Cannon said:

Before Alford, Yes.  But Billy and Calipari are so very different.  

Not according to your qualifications above.  

[SteelerHoosier]

3 minutes ago, Old Friend said:

No.  That's not what I' saying.  John Calipari has national championships, too.  Do you want him?    Let's keep things in context.

How are Billy and Cal similar?