Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

CrossboneIU22

Welcome Coach Miller

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Bowhunter said:

I wouldn't worry about him leaving for OSU. I know he said it was a dream job but Indiana has a better past and hopefully a brighter future.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app
 

Not to mention IU should be more than willing to surpass anything OSU would be willing to offer Archie if he's successful here. 

Remember Archie turned down multiple power 5 offers (NC State comes to mind) in order to wait for the right opening. He obviously thinks very highly of the IU job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My friend who will be one of my roommates next school year told me his grandpa is upset at the hire... 83 years old... Wanted Alford. Ugh. Have no understanding as to why someone would prefer a 52 year old coach who's made the tournament less than a third of his years coaching D-I who also defended a sexual predator.

 

I at least can understand why my dad, grandpa and cousin are worried that Archie might be a lateral move.

 

Personally I love this hire. I just look at Archie's consistency getting to the tourney 4 straight years and compare Archie's and Crean's stats in the areas where I griped about Crean's coaching pre-firing. If you cut Archie's career in halves, his teams have cut back on turnovers better than Crean's, increased in defensive prowess (opposite of Crean's) and have not become as 3pt dependent as Crean's.

 

In the first 3 years ('11-'13) Archie's teams averaged 13.1 turnovers/game. In the latter 3 years, the average was 12.0/game (a 1.1/game improvement) . In only one season (2012-13) did the Flyers average more than 13.0 turnovers/game.

 

Crean's team's average from '11-'13: 13.6. From '14-'16: 13.4/game (only a 0.2/game improvement). In only 3 seasons did Crean's Hoosiers average 13.0 turnovers/game or less (2011-12, 2012-13 and 2014-15).

 

Next, look at defense.

Archie's teams allowed an average 67.1 points/game from 2011-13. From 2014-16: 64.5/game (2.6/game decrease/improvement).

 

Crean's teams from 2011-13: 65.4 opposing points/game. From 2014-16: 71.6/game (6.2/game increase/regression).

 

Its noteworthy that Crean's low in points allowed over the stretch was 62.1/game (2012-13: Zeller's sophomore year) while Archie's was 60.8/game (2014-15: the year he had nobody over 6'6" on the team).

I'm pretty sure if you averaged Kenpom AdjD rankings, the trend would be the same/similar.

 

Finally: Dependency on 3-Pointers. I know IU shoots a relatively high percentage on 3's, but I feel like a lot of our losses this year came when we didn't shoot lights out ("living and dying by the 3").

 

Archie's teams 2011-13: 18.5 3PAtt./game. 2014-16: 19.7/game (1.2/game increase).

 

Crean's teams 2011-13: 16.2/game. 2014-16: 23.3/game (7.1/game increase).

 

Again, I know Crean's teams (at least this year's team anyway) made a higher percentage of threes than Archie's, and higher percentage on more shots means more points scored. I feel, however like we had on nights where we kicked a$$ with the 3, but way too many off nights, where the high number of attempts and high number of misses killed us.

 

To me, statistically speaking, Archie has improved (or at least not gone crazy as far as 3s go) in three critical facets of coaching consistent basketball teams, while Crean regressed in those areas.

Crean seems to have peaked (at IU) in 2012 (and his peak was the Sweet 16 with a Ridiculously talented and experienced team), then mostly gone downhill. Plus he's 51 years old.

Archie appears to be on the upswing as a coach and is only 38. He's still growing and has plenty of time to do so, and already showed more consistency than CTC ever did.

 

Please let me know of flaws in my logic and/or math. Was up too late when I wrote this.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bored went to see who is following Archie now. A lot of celebs are now lol and most importantly Shane Hiermann(La Lumiere) and Lawrence Norths HC, Park Tudor and a few other HS school coaches in the area.

Sent from my LGLS676 using BtownBanners mobile app



Point of curiosity. Were any of those coaches following Crean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Treesh, this is just my opinion, and you are certainly welcome to yours, but most of us do not need the negativity you are bringing to the board. If you have to be negative, try to please keep your own misery.


Wasn't trying to be negative, was more of the lines of funny. Miller has been on my coaching board for the last 3 months.

I just wanted Billy. Lol


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, CR3AMnCR1MS0N said:

My friend who will be one of my roommates next school year told me his grandpa is upset at the hire... 83 years old... Wanted Alford. Ugh. Have no understanding as to why someone would prefer a 52 year old coach who's made the tournament less than a third of his years coaching D-I who also defended a sexual predator.

 

Not trying to knock your grandpa here but I think a large portion of the older generation just can't let go of the Knight glory years.  They think that any connection to him or the era is the answer, regardless of the candidates abilities or flaws, and it's clearly not. I think this is that "IU guy" mentality that I just don't understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not trying to knock your grandpa here but I think a large portion of the older generation just can't let go of the Knight glory years.  They think that any connection to him or the era is the answer, regardless of the candidates abilities or flaws, and it's clearly not. I think this is that "IU guy" mentality that I just don't understand.


Yeah I believe this is it. My grandparents wanted Alford too. It's hard to blame them. Their IU glory years were Knight and Alford, etc. and they don't keep up like I do, it's just what they know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not trying to knock your grandpa here but I think a large portion of the older generation just can't let go of the Knight glory years.  They think that any connection to him or the era is the answer, regardless of the candidates abilities or flaws, and it's clearly not. I think this is that "IU guy" mentality that I just don't understand.

I'm a guy who watched all the glory years with Knight and never missed a game even if it was just radio.
His last few years his coaching slipped.I was ready for him to go when it happened and with his behavior as late have lost a lot of respect for him.
Loved Alford as a player, but as a coach not so much. Most know the Pierce/Alford story.
I'm encouraged by what I have read that Miller holds his players accountable.Crean didnt until his hand was forced.He never did in game.
I'm excited by this hire and believe we'll se a totally different culture on and off the floor.It feels good to be a Hoosier fan again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Woodson1980 said:


I'm a guy who watched all the glory years with Knight and never missed a game even if it was just radio.
His last few years his coaching slipped.I was ready for him to go when it happened and with his behavior as late have lost a lot of respect for him.
Loved Alford as a player, but as a coach not so much. Most know the Pierce/Alford story.
I'm encouraged by what I have read that Miller holds his players accountable.Crean didnt until his hand was forced.He never did in game.
I'm excited by this hire and believe we'll se a totally different culture on and off the floor.It feels good to be a Hoosier fan again.

I guess I should state that I too was around during those years as well.  They were good, exciting years but this is a new era.  I'm more excited by the Miller hire every day and ready to see what he can build.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not trying to knock your grandpa here but I think a large portion of the older generation just can't let go of the Knight glory years.  They think that any connection to him or the era is the answer, regardless of the candidates abilities or flaws, and it's clearly not. I think this is that "IU guy" mentality that I just don't understand.


Not my grandpa, my friend's. All my family I talked to thought an Alford hire was a bad idea.

I agree with your statement though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CR3AMnCR1MS0N said:

 


Not my grandpa, my friend's. All my family I talked to thought an Alford hire was a bad idea.

I agree with your statement though.

 

Oops, sorry CR.  I'm still working on my reading comprehension skills! lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×