Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

Chicago State announced today it will play at Bloominton on Nov. 6.   Yes, the same Chicago State who just announced today it filled its head coaching position which had been vacant since mid-March.   Lance Irvin what have you gotten yourself into?  lol

Yikes at that Kenpom

Posted
6 minutes ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

Chicago State announced today it will play at Bloominton on Nov. 6.   Yes, the same Chicago State who just announced today it filled its head coaching position which had been vacant since mid-March.   Lance Irvin what have you gotten yourself into?  lol

Archie's allowed one, right?

Posted
Id consider that a massive success. I’d say duke is 95% loss.
 
At Arkansas 60/40
 
Louisville 65/35
 
Marquette 75/25
 
Butler 70/30
 
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

You guys are making me think my expectations this year may be too high....
I would expect to be 8-1 in those games.... with Duke being the most likely loss, and I guess at Arkansas wouldn't surprise me completely but I don't expect to lose any of those home games....

I would be surprised if we won at Cameron against the Fighting K's. The rest are definitely winnable but I could see a slip up somewhere whether it's at Arkansas or against Butler. I don't think we lose at home though. 9-2 would be a solid noncon record but 10-1 would be top 25 worthy with a great RPI/SOS.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted

I’m seeing ten non-conference games. 

One is a likely loss, five are very likely to be wins, and four are gonna be a close call.

If things go according to Hoyle, that’s a 7-3 non con. Let’s say we add to that a 12-8 conference record and a first round B1G tourney win.

That equates to a 20-12 record with a very, very strong strength of schedule, and that is a tourney team.

So, for me at this point, better than 20-12 leans toward overachievement, and less leans toward underachievement.

 

Posted
45 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

I’m seeing ten non-conference games. 

One is a likely loss, five are very likely to be wins, and four are gonna be a close call.

If things go according to Hoyle, that’s a 7-3 non con. Let’s say we add to that a 12-8 conference record and a first round B1G tourney win.

That equates to a 20-12 record with a very, very strong strength of schedule, and that is a tourney team.

So, for me at this point, better than 20-12 leans toward overachievement, and less leans toward underachievement.

 

I will be very very disappointed with a 12-8 conference record. 

Lowest we should be in our single plays is 3-3. No excuse to be lower. 

Should be at least 6-2 and in our Rutgers, Iowa, Northwestern and Illinois double plays. 

Then with Michigan, MSU and Purdue 3-3 again minimum  

12-8 should be bare minimum  

 

Posted
I will be very very disappointed with a 12-8 conference record. 
Lowest we should be in our single plays is 3-3. No excuse to be lower. 
Should be at least 6-2 and in our Rutgers, Iowa, Northwestern and Illinois double plays. 
Then with Michigan, MSU and Purdue 3-3 again minimum  
12-8 should be bare minimum  
 

I agree, we could very well have two All-Big Ten first team players in Romeo and Juwan. 12-8 would be disappointing to me as well.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners
Posted

12-8 would put us in that 4th-6th place area that we're projected to.

Can we do better? Sure, but that would be a bonus, not an avoidance of disappointment for me.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...