BottomLine Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 As much as I hated to see IU lose to Michigan, I can't help but wonder if it is for the best. The only way that we were going to improve out seed for the NCAA tourney is if we won the BTT. But would it have been worth it? We have players nursing injuries and playing them in the BTT only increased the possibility that they would re-injure themselves. Can't see how the extra week of rest and healing can't work out to our favor. So we don't get a #2 seed. Big deal. We are easily in and will probably draw somewhere between a 3 and 5. I'd be happy at this point with a #4. At full strength, healthy, rested and focused I like our chances. I guess I'm one of those half full guys. Quote
Ryno6284 Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 As much as I hated to see IU lose to Michigan, I can't help but wonder if it is for the best. The only way that we were going to improve out seed for the NCAA tourney is if we won the BTT. But would it have been worth it? We have players nursing injuries and playing them in the BTT only increased the possibility that they would re-injure themselves. Can't see how the extra week of rest and healing can't work out to our favor. So we don't get a #2 seed. Big deal. We are easily in and will probably draw somewhere between a 3 and 5. I'd be happy at this point with a #4. At full strength, healthy, rested and focused I like our chances. I guess I'm one of those half full guys. No, that is loser mentality! We should have went on a tear this weekend and then let next weekend go where it may. We had four days rest this week, how did that work out? ccgeneral, Scooter D, USMCHoosier and 3 others 6 Quote
crazywillie Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 No loss is ever a good loss MikeRoberts, TrueHoosier62, Hoosierfan2017 and 3 others 6 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 If we won today and lost tomorrow we are still a 3. This loss makes us a 4 more than likely. If my prediction is right, it was a crushing loss both in momentum, fan/media perspective and in the brackets. The difference between a 2 and 3 and a 3 and 4 are huge. Big blow to our egos and seeding. I just hope when they crunch the numbers we still somehow fall on the 3 line, miraculously. MikeRoberts, Alford Bailey, Class of '66 Old Fart and 4 others 7 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 If we won today and lost tomorrow we are still a 3. This loss makes us a 4 more than likely. If my prediction is right, it was a crushing loss both in momentum, fan/media perspective and in the brackets. The difference between a 2 and 3 and a 3 and 4 are huge. Big blow to our egos and seeding. I just hope when they crunch the numbers we still somehow fall on the 3 line, miraculously.from the media coverage I have seen today no one has jumped off the iu train and they have said iu is a good team that can make a run. Looking at the number I don't see any way we stay a 3. 4 would be my guess with a 5 a possibility depending on what others do this weekend. I have said this for a while seeds 4-12 there just isn't much separation in my opinion. Team resumes for 3-5 seeds don't look all that different. One thing is for sure next weekend is going to be a hell of a ride Stuhoo 1 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 3 vs 4 is a pretty big deal. I agree, we are off the 3. The media went from "they are national title contenders" to " they can make a run and get to the final four". It's a bad look today no matter how you slice it. At least we get to play next week. Let's let the bar slip and excuse this performance. When you are growing or regrowing a brand every tournament means something. They leave lasting impressions. Creans reputation will precede him until he changes it. Adillac, Alford Bailey, ALASKA HOOSIER and 2 others 5 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 Watching power teams like UNC and Kansas take care of business doesn't lessen the blow. theriverpilot, coonhounds, ALASKA HOOSIER and 1 other 4 Quote
coonhounds Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 3 vs 4 is a pretty big deal. I agree, we are off the 3. The media went from "they are national title contenders" to " they can make a run and get to the final four". It's a bad look today no matter how you slice it. At least we get to play next week. Let's let the bar slip and excuse this performance. When you are growing or regrowing a brand every tournament means something. They leave lasting impressions. Creans reputation will precede him until he changes it.smartest poster on this board Quote
coonhounds Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 I am cool with the bob knight nobody cares about the big ten tourney bs. It didn't work out for him hope it does for crean Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 Watching power teams like UNC and Kansas take care of business doesn't lessen the blow.sure about Kansas? Self just had to put starters back in. They are only up 4. I am of course kidding. Until he put 2nd unit in they looked good WayneFleekHoosier 1 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 I am cool with the bob knight nobody cares about the big ten tourney bs. It didn't work out for him hope it does for creanlol. Crean cares though. I just wish he could shake the stereotypes. In Crean talk, I'm ABSOLUTELY wishing for it. Side note- anyone notice Crean uses "absolutely" as an adverb in every interview? ALASKA HOOSIER and coonhounds 2 Quote
coonhounds Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 lol. Crean cares though. I just wish he could shake the stereotypes. In Crean talk, I'm ABSOLUTELY wishing for it. Side note- anyone notice Crean uses "absolutely" as an adverb in every interview?I agree but today yogi sat to long and don said Robert was ready. Kind of half butted it WayneFleekHoosier and ALASKA HOOSIER 2 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 3 vs 4 is a pretty big deal. I agree, we are off the 3. The media went from "they are national title contenders" to " they can make a run and get to the final four". It's a bad look today no matter how you slice it. At least we get to play next week. Let's let the bar slip and excuse this performance. When you are growing or regrowing a brand every tournament means something. They leave lasting impressions. Creans reputation will precede him until he changes it.in a normal year I would agree with you that a 3 vs 4 is a big deal. But from what I have seen this year the 13 and 14 seeds will be about the same and the 6 and 5 seeds look to be interchangeable in my opinion ALASKA HOOSIER and coonhounds 2 Quote
coonhounds Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 It's Indiana we will be ok. Oh wait . Glass half empty ALASKA HOOSIER 1 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 lol. Crean cares though. I just wish he could shake the stereotypes. In Crean talk, I'm ABSOLUTELY wishing for it. Side note- anyone notice Crean uses "absolutely" as an adverb in every interview?"no question about it" is another go to interview quote WayneFleekHoosier and coonhounds 2 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 So... I'm absolutely wishing for a deep tourney run, no question about it. We just have to push the pace. ?? ALASKA HOOSIER, ThompsonHoosier, Napleshoosier and 2 others 5 Quote
Popular Post Old Friend Posted March 12, 2016 Popular Post Posted March 12, 2016 Indiana Basketball is not known for success in the regular season, beating weather vane teams, or being able to win conference home games. True, we had a couple of nice road wins this season, however one was against Iowa...a team fading into the oblivion and on a downward spiral when we played them. We had a very easy conference road schedule, which, to the team's credit, we took advantage of. But that erases nothing today. Indiana is known for post season success. Yes, Big Ten titles are nice, and I'm on record as saying being in the title conversation every year should be Indiana's primary goal. Consistency will - like Michigan State - put Indiana in position to do good things in the post season every year, too; and that's what I want. To "be there" every year. Problems are : 1) Tom Crean has never won consistently in his career 2) Tom Crean's post season record is abysmal. Awful. Today...Belien stretched out every offensive possession. His players took away transition, AND they took away the 3 point line. Formula for beating Indiana....every time? Check. And, Crean never adjusted. Never trapped, never pressured the ball, never did anything to speed them up. We didn't look inside out on the offensive end, preferring to play slowly on the perimeter; and take several bad shots. At the end of the game, we played into Michigan's hands by letting Williams dribble the ball..drive into traffic. Turnover or fumbled ball waiting to happen. If I'm Belien, I want anyone BUT Yogi with the ball in his hands, because Yogi has become unguardable and can get to the lane and FT line about when he wants to. Ball is not in Yogi's hands. Crean's substitutions were baffling. Absolutely dumbfounding. We go on a run almost exclusively because of Bryant, and Bryant comes out. Yogi, who looks like a cross-fit poster model and is a senior who needs to be in the game comes out just after Michigan went with a 1-3-1 half court trap, and Niego promptly turns it over. He also makes a horrible pass to Bielfelt, I think who immediately turns it over because the pass was toward the defense. Hartman does next to nothing, but plays 20 minutes. Ryan Burton plays 5 minutes. Niego 4. It's tournament time, boys. You don't play walk ons in close games. You just don't. Crean has not been a successful post season coach. He gets OUT coached time and time again. So...until he proves me wrong, I view IU's glass as half empty simply because "they are who we thought they were." There's a reason our SOS is very low. I think we're still a 4 seed, but this loss cost us at least one line, and I'd sure rather be a 3 than a 4. But the primary reason I'm "half empty" tonight? I saw the same things I always see when IU loses, and Crean seems to do just enough to keep his job, and keep Indiana mired in mediocrity. Purdue just kicked the crap out of Illinois. Made it look easy. We've got the best point guard in the country, a McDonald's All American Big Man, and terrific shooters; and we couldn't even get good shots. Maddening. WayneFleekHoosier, Napleshoosier, Happydaze and 8 others 11 Quote
Adillac Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 "Without question" Every team and coach we play is "phenomenal" "especially in this league". I much prefer pissed off Crean, the guy who gives short answers and curt replies to all reporters. I think angry Crean coaches better. Fresh off a little success makes Crean soft and his teams temperamental. I think it sucked we lost today, but no way in hell do we play well in the tourney after winning the BTT. Sadly, it is hard to see that pattern ever really working for Crean and IU. The idea is to win and keep winning. Too much winning shouldn't hurt your chances of winning, but with Crean, it does. Am I reading too much into it? Probably. Will love to see how IU responds... Quote
Feathery Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 Glass half empty bc of the ramifications of this loss. We are likely a 4/5 seed now instead of a 3 seed. Which doesn't mean much the first weekend but this is a 2nd weekend team. I'd rather not face a #1 seed in the sweet 16. I'd rather be a 2/3 seed and have an easier game in the sweet 16. In my eyes this loss just decreased our chances of making a deeper run this year. Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 12, 2016 Posted March 12, 2016 Glass half empty bc of the ramifications of this loss. We are likely a 4/5 seed now instead of a 3 seed. Which doesn't mean much the first weekend but this is a 2nd weekend team. I'd rather not face a #1 seed in the sweet 16. I'd rather be a 2/3 seed and have an easier game in the sweet 16. In my eyes this loss just decreased our chances of making a deeper run this year.wouldnt that depend on who the 1 and 2 seeds would be? For instance if Villanova was the 1 and mich st was the 2 I would argue I would rather face Villanova I used these 2 because most bracketologist have nova 1 and state 2 as of now Bobman1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.