Hutsell1979 Posted November 8, 2015 Posted November 8, 2015 Putting a wrap on Indiana's fifth-straight setback.Putting a wrap on Indiana's fifth straight loss as bowl eligibility starts to look bleaker and bleaker by the week. THE GOOD 1. Jordan Howard - The pregame video of wild buffalo roaming the streets of Bloomington to the tune of Metallica's "Enter Sandman" could easily be replaced by video of Howard running roughshod through Big Ten defenders. The junior picked up his fifth 100-yard game of the season Saturday (remember he missed or was injured for all or most of the October slate while with an ankle injury). He finished with 176 yards on 22 carries Saturday, eclipsing the century mark by halftime. This is against a team that had surrendered 85 yards per game before kickoff. 2. The offensive line - Reference back to point one and give major kudos to the unit in front of him. Both of Howards first-half touchdown runs came running to the left side of the line behind soon to be NFL tackle Jason Spriggs and left guard Wes Martin. Indiana's line at this point has been one of college football's best. Any recognition for them is deserved. 3. Nate Sudfeld - The senior was steady again in a record-breaking day. His fourth-quarter touchdown pass made him Indiana's all-time leader in that category, giving him 49 in his career. THE BAD 1. Targeting: Any rule implemented to increase player safety isn't bad. The targeting rule in NCAA football is designed for safety. If it was any tougher to understand it would have been written in Latin on the squares of a Rubix cube. Black and white enforcement of the rule is leading to too many players being forced out of games for plays that don't merit that type of consequence. The Hoosiers lost starting middle linebacker T.J. Simmons late in the first half on Saturday after he drew a targeting penalty on a pass intended for Iowa's Tayvaun Smith. The hit was helmet to helmet so the penalty was warranted, the intent was to make a tackle though and Smith slid to the ground, crossing pass with Simmons as he dove to make a play. Simmons ended up in the locker room for his efforts. Smith was shaken up, but did return. There's no right or wrong way to go about this rule. Player safety should and does come first. But seeing players disqualified for simple football plays is tough, regardless of what team you’re rooting for as a fan. 2. Drops - Any coach will tell you one drop is too many, but Indiana had several Saturday that were momentum changers. Mitchell Paige could have set Indiana up in scoring territory. Anthony Corsaro had one that he could have made it to Kirkwood before a defender got within reach. Close games are won or lost on little things. Drops are one of them. 3. Red zone woes - Indiana is getting close too often but not cashing in. Saturday IU made three trips inside the Iowa 20-yard line but could only turn one into a touchdown - and that was on the Hoosiers final drive of the game. Turning field goals into touchdowns has to happen to turn one of these close losses into a mark in the win column. [url=https://btownbanners.com/page/index.html/_/football/news-notes/the-good-and-the-bad-iowa-r246]Click here to view the article[/url] IUsafety, JaybobHoosier, Naturalhoosier and 2 others 5 Quote
HoosierReb01 Posted November 8, 2015 Posted November 8, 2015 Good analysis. That targeting call was just crap. barrettballer and theriverpilot 2 Quote
Alford Bailey Posted November 8, 2015 Posted November 8, 2015 Its just amazing we have these great pieces but have lost 5 straight. If I'm Wilson I change the game plan. Go ball control and play to our strengths of a strong offensive line and Howard. Mix in a little Redding. A little play action pass from time to time and hope the receiver catches it. ANYTHING to keep our D on the sideline. barrettballer 1 Quote
Dalton26 Posted November 8, 2015 Posted November 8, 2015 Good article but I disagree with Suds being a part of the good. There were a lot of drops but he didn't look steady by any stretch of the imagination. HoosierReb01 1 Quote
JSHoosier Posted November 8, 2015 Posted November 8, 2015 Good article but I disagree with Suds being a part of the good. There were a lot of drops but he didn't look steady by any stretch of the imagination. Yeah, it's a definite stretch. I wouldn't put him as part of the good. HoosierReb01 1 Quote
Naturalhoosier Posted November 8, 2015 Posted November 8, 2015 I'm disappointed that in his senior year he is still staring down receivers and floating passes longer than 30 yards. barrettballer, JaybobHoosier, Dalton26 and 1 other 4 Quote
OliviaPope40 Posted November 8, 2015 Posted November 8, 2015 The quote they got from Suds last night was another issue. Quote
HoosierAloha Posted November 8, 2015 Posted November 8, 2015 I would put Suds as part of the good. How many receivers just dropped the ball? How many more yards would he have had, better completion %, and likely another TD or two. Quote
The Ola Depot Posted November 8, 2015 Posted November 8, 2015 I would put Suds as part of the good. How many receivers just dropped the ball? How many more yards would he have had, better completion %, and likely another TD or two.He also had two interceptions dropped that were because he was staring down his receiver. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.