Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Hoosier DaDa said:

We need to hire Crean as our OC. He was our last coach where we could shoot worth a damn.

You don’t hire Crean, you hire Buckley. Shot coaching is shockingly underrated given the nature of the game. Refining shot mechanics is never ending. I don’t care if you’re putting up 500 shots a day, if it’s not happening with fastidious attention to detail it’s only so productive. My favorite example is Robert Johnson. Dude fought a lot of funk in his stroke. Had some backward lean and left  drift. Under Buckley he was basically a 40% shooter over 3 years. Under a year with CAM he had 1 game, Iowa or Minny I think, where he made a million 3’s but his stroke deteriorated all year and he was probably a 35% guy without that game. I don’t care how many shots Woody says they’re getting up in the gym. I care about how they’re getting them up and it better not be just some GA rebounding for them.

Posted
1 hour ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

From Ant Wright.  Our Top 10 most used lineups from last night.

 

Image

Yeah, continues to show Woodson's insistence on a 2-big lineup, some experimentation (poorly considered, imo) but very little w/o Ballo-Malik. The Rice-Goode-Malik-Bako-Carlyle lineup did get 8 points in 7 poss but Rice was having an off night particularly in the first half (TO's) which undercut it and Goode still isn't hitting shots (have to think that will change, he can shoot).

Posted
3 hours ago, Demo said:

you hire Buckley

^ this!! I had only seen the shot doc 2 times for pre-game warmups.  It seemed as if he had an intense focus on studying the players and not chatty with anyone at least while I was watching. I often think of having him back.

Posted
4 hours ago, Chris007 said:

I believe we dropped 3 spots by only winning by 19.

More factors than that probably led to dropping 3 spots in Ken Pom.   They could have won by 25 + and still dropped depending on what others did around them.   They could have gained spots by only winning by 19 if their offensive efficiency would have been higher.   16 TO against that team probably dragged it down.    KenPom still uses last years results in his early rankings.   NET doesn’t use any of last years results however those ranking won’t be put out until later in the year with more data and still those first set of rankings are all over the place.     The 19 point win was IUs biggest margin of victory since Dec of 2022 when they played Elon which was the last team IU beat by more the 20 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...