Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Class of '66 Old Fart

Transfer Portal w IU Interest

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Shooter said:

Let's say we add four as you suggest. That puts us at 10 players, one of whom may or may not be physically able to contribute. Are we going into the season with 9-10 players? What happens when the inevitable injuries hit, or somebody get suspended, etc?  We won't even be able to go 5 on 5 in practice without including the walkons.

I'll agree that all 7 portal guys don't have to be studs, but we do need to fill out a roster. For what it's worth, Anthony Leal was pretty clearly the 11th man at the start of the season, and he ended up playing 20+ minutes a night by the end.

I'm saying you need to put emphasis on 4-5 players (definitely two guards), you can obviously use your 11th, 12th, and 13th scholarship on depth pieces to use in emergency situations. But my comment is in regards to those suggesting that IU needs to sign 7 top portal players just to be competitive next year. I don't see it that way at all. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm saying you need to put emphasis on 4-5 players (definitely two guards), you can obviously use your 11th, 12th, and 13th scholarship on depth pieces to use in emergency situations. But my comment is in regards to those suggesting that IU needs to sign 7 top portal players just to be competitive next year. I don't see it that way at all. 
And you're right.....

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, AH1971 said:

I'm saying you need to put emphasis on 4-5 players (definitely two guards), you can obviously use your 11th, 12th, and 13th scholarship on depth pieces to use in emergency situations. But my comment is in regards to those suggesting that IU needs to sign 7 top portal players just to be competitive next year. I don't see it that way at all. 

You're exactly right. I hope that staff fills 11, 12, and 13 with skilled basketball players who have multiple years of eligibility. Opposed to guys with no skills and a single year of eligibility (not going to name names).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm saying you need to put emphasis on 4-5 players (definitely two guards), you can obviously use your 11th, 12th, and 13th scholarship on depth pieces to use in emergency situations. But my comment is in regards to those suggesting that IU needs to sign 7 top portal players just to be competitive next year. I don't see it that way at all. 
We need all we can get! Depending on who goes pro and who leaves we need more. Also depends on your definition of competitive. This year we were not so we need alot imo

Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/19/2024 at 3:12 PM, HoosierTrav said:

I really hate to see people expecting Jakai Newton to be explosive. He had one of the worst injuries a basketball player can have. I cannot think of a single player that’s had it, come back even close to athletic as they were prior to it. Best case is he retained some athleticism and developed a ton of skill and IQ. 
 

Count me as one who thinks we get close to nothing from Jakai Newton in his time at IU. Which sucks bc I was really excited about him prior to his injury. 

What was his injury?  I just always heard leg injury. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/19/2024 at 1:12 PM, HoosierTrav said:

I really hate to see people expecting Jakai Newton to be explosive. He had one of the worst injuries a basketball player can have. I cannot think of a single player that’s had it, come back even close to athletic as they were prior to it. Best case is he retained some athleticism and developed a ton of skill and IQ. 
 

Count me as one who thinks we get close to nothing from Jakai Newton in his time at IU. Which sucks bc I was really excited about him prior to his injury. 

Sadly this is pretty accurate as I see it. Tough break for a kid, but it's a hard situation to bounce back from.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, AH1971 said:

Who said anything about top 50? Some of the best acquisitions in the portal didn't sniff the top 50:

Per On3

-Marcus Domask #118

-Daniss Jenkins #139

-Hunter Sallis #194

-Ryan Conwell #182

-Cam Spencer unranked

Pick any 2 of those players and IU is soundly in the tournament this year, 

So you're looking after the fact -- that's the easy way.  :)  

Domask -- 4 years at SIU to Big10 -- turned out, but 3 pt % took a dump.

Jenkins -- Followed his coach. Wasn't available?  

Sallis --  25% from three before he transferred.  Would have fit right in at IU.  Did make a big jump this year.  

Conwell -- still playing at a "lower" level. 

Spencer -- Would have been a good pickup.  Wonder why we didn't get him.  

 

Do you really think our staff can do their homework and find potential diamonds in the rough?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Hoosier DaDa said:

What was his injury?  I just always heard leg injury. 

The only reports I've seen say "torn meniscus and cartilage issue". He had surgery his senior year of HS, but had to have it redone after he enrolled at Indiana. Sounds like the surgery while in HS didn't help, and may have made it worse. He missed his entire senior year in HS and freshman year at IU.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, coonhounds said:

Haven't been able to follow to close today. How many big fish have we landed so far?

Sent from my SM-A326U using Tapatalk
 

Doesn't sound like we made it to the fishing grounds yet.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, RoncalliHoosier said:

Sadly this is pretty accurate as I see it. Tough break for a kid, but it's a hard situation to bounce back from.

I am willing to give him time.  We have the room.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Golfman25 said:

So you're looking after the fact -- that's the easy way.  :)  

Domask -- 4 years at SIU to Big10 -- turned out, but 3 pt % took a dump.

Jenkins -- Followed his coach. Wasn't available?  

Sallis --  25% from three before he transferred.  Would have fit right in at IU.  Did make a big jump this year.  

Conwell -- still playing at a "lower" level. 

Spencer -- Would have been a good pickup.  Wonder why we didn't get him.  

 

Do you really think our staff can do their homework and find potential diamonds in the rough?  

I'm not on the staff, it's not my job to evaluate 1500 players. I'm simply pointing out your false rhetoric that good portal pieces exist outside the top 50. If the staff can't identify or evaluate a couple key guards in the portal this offseason we will almost assuredly struggle again next year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, AH1971 said:

I'm saying you need to put emphasis on 4-5 players (definitely two guards), you can obviously use your 11th, 12th, and 13th scholarship on depth pieces to use in emergency situations. But my comment is in regards to those suggesting that IU needs to sign 7 top portal players just to be competitive next year. I don't see it that way at all. 

Thanks for clarifying. I think we need at least 8-9 quality Big Ten level players. We currently have 3. Hopefully Cupps develops into #4, but that remains to be seen. I think Leal's ceiling on a good team is 9-10th guy. So I agree we need 4-5 guys to come in and be immediate contributors.

I've been looking for examples of teams that had 4-5 first-year transfers in their top 8-9 guys, to see how they did. I'm not aware of any teams like that who were really good. A couple had decent seasons and made the tourney, Florida and Texas Tech. A bunch more missed the tourney.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, AH1971 said:

I'm not on the staff, it's not my job to evaluate 1500 players. I'm simply pointing out your false rhetoric that good portal pieces exist outside the top 50. If the staff can't identify or evaluate a couple key guards in the portal this offseason we will almost assuredly struggle again next year. 

These guys need sure things.  It's the difference between hiring Pearl vs Dusty.  Both may work out, but one is a definite will work out.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You're exactly right. I hope that staff fills 11, 12, and 13 with skilled basketball players who have multiple years of eligibility. Opposed to guys with no skills and a single year of eligibility (not going to name names).
I am guessing they will end up taking who they can get. The only thing they have to offer is money. Good players will have many other options on winning teams.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×