They “Retired” Coach Woodson Thread

[Hoosier DaDa 3,546]

1 hour ago, Home Jersey said:

I’m picturing @IUFAN1976 sending that email and instead of getting no response/a generic auto reply, he immediately receives a phone call from a blocked number. Turns out Scott really does read everyone’s message and take their points to heart. He’s calling to find out who leaked his plan of bringing Crean back on an interim basis, and he is real mad it’s already made its way to the message boards. Lol

[steubenhoosier 1,510]

16 hours ago, Banksyrules said:

Ok I better go to bed then.  @KathywithaC thank you so much for petty interactions.  Thanks to you (shout out to all the legends Thyme, AH, Steuben, you’re also heroes) we will reach record posting levels on this topic.  Remember folks, don’t forget to beg your kids to ask the tooth fairy to get rid of Woodson before it’s too late. Go Hoosiers. 

You seem to have a thing about including me in your dismissive posts when I have added little to this over the last few days, and what I have added suggests that I am slowly changing my opinion. 

Thanks for the mentions though.

[cybergates 499]

1 hour ago, DoctorP said:

Has anyone ever seen ProvocateurwithaP and DougJr74 in a room at the same time? I rest my case

One joined March 6. One joined March 7.

[IUFAN1976 4,320]

1 hour ago, Golfman25 said:

Maybe that money should just buy a bull dozer and just remove that hump.  

And some dynamite!!!

[KathywithaC 673]

1 hour ago, Golfman25 said:

Isn't that what is supposed to happen -- a thorough search to find the right candidate?  Then build your consensus around that search and candidate.  What you're basically saying, without realizing it, is there was no search, no "consensus."  Instead a couple of dudes bullied their way into their chosen candidate.  And how did that work out?  The system you keep saying IU uses wasn't even used.  It came down to somebody's friend got the job.  

No, that’s not what I’m saying. Plenty of moving pieces on it, though. 

[JSHoosier 21,676]

56 minutes ago, MemphisHoosier said:

Looks he was barely awake for the picture.

[IUFAN1976 4,320]

1 hour ago, Brass Cannon said:

It’s actual work 

And that seems to be something him and Woodson are allergic too!

[IUFAN1976 4,320]

1 hour ago, Chris007 said:

Money is the nickname of your favorite guy on the sidelines who is always fighting to stay awake

He makes a darn good living taking naps, much like the guy in the office beside me, lol!

[Chris007 55,698]

Just now, IUFAN1976 said:

He makes a darn good living taking naps, much like the guy in the office beside me, lol!

The guy in the office beside you has an appendix so he's worth more. I think that was you. Hope your recovering well

[IUFAN1976 4,320]

1 hour ago, Golfman25 said:

WTF.  Is this an Outfit Program?  Looks more and more like it.  :)  

It’s the Woody Cult!

[KathywithaC 673]

1 hour ago, Golfman25 said:

See the problem is that doesn't sound like a "consensus" to me.  

The “pursuit” of Stevens was a cluster F from the start, so much so that it never should’ve occurred. A few people thought they could move mountains and didn’t want to listen to anyone but themselves.

[IUFAN1976 4,320]

49 minutes ago, DChoosier said:

Just checked Fanduel and the over/under on when he will fall asleep tonight is at the 10 minute mark of the first half.

I’m going with the under as I don’t think he will make it past 8 minutes since the building is going to be dead and who cares about a game vs Sam Walton? Also doesn’t help that it gets dark early.

It helps his naps!

[IUFAN1976 4,320]

34 minutes ago, steubenhoosier said:

You seem to have a thing about including me in your dismissive posts when I have added little to this over the last few days, and what I have added suggests that I am slowly changing my opinion. 

Thanks for the mentions though.

You haven’t changed your opinion yet or fast enough!  It still sounds like the jury was still out on Woodson sucking as a coach!  You have a ways to catch up to join and be accepted to the FIRE MIKE WOODSON fraternity/club!  But we all have confidence you will get there someday!!! 

[IUFAN1976 4,320]

1 hour ago, JSHoosier said:

Since when do qualifications matter? If they did Woodson wouldn't be here.

Again, more Nepotism!!!

[Home Jersey 12,327]

17 minutes ago, KathywithaC said:

The “pursuit” of Stevens was a cluster F from the start, so much so that it never should’ve occurred. A few people thought they could move mountains and didn’t want to listen to anyone but themselves.

It’s unsurprising that Dolson, who by all accounts seems like a capable individual with a clear vision for IU athletics, would embrace the responsibility of his title as Athletic Director and want to own the decisions that fall within his remit.

Certainly you want, and indeed, in some cases - need - “stakeholder” buy-in. Who falls into which category though? And how does one measure the trade offs made along the way based on competing priorities? Striking the balance can be quite tricky.

Some may fault a greener Scott Dolson for swinging for the fences and missing. They would have valid points.

Others may place greater blame on the parties with a conflict of interest, who took full advantage of Scott’s missed swing, so that they could ramrod their guy in and fully exploit the fruits of IU.

I’m sure those responsible for the decisions made after Dolson missed on his top target, would not view their actions in those terms, and genuinely believe they’re doing what’s best for IU. It’s just that their best clearly is not producing good enough results. Woody is not maliciously taking advantage, it’s just who he is… not a very good coach and one without any prior CBB coaching experience. 

The discontent from fans is based on the perception that these guys are riding high on the hog, mailing it in and enjoying the benefits that come with IU because of who they used to be and still mean to important people, not because it’s deserved based on who they are today. Ironically, they also don’t want to listen to anyone but themselves. And so here we are.

[Golfman25 6,295]

21 minutes ago, KathywithaC said:

No, that’s not what I’m saying. Plenty of moving pieces on it, though. 

No that is exactly what you are saying.  You start out saying at IU the AD has to build consensus on the hire and/or fire -- he must consult various people to build that consensus.  Then when that consensus is formed a final decision is made.  You have stated multiple time that is how IU and many other athletic departments work.  Fine so be it.  

But now you say, Woodson was pushed to SD by Quinn and maybe someone else.  That is not the consensus building model which you say many athletic departments use.  That is someone using his "power" to bully others into a decision.    

[Golfman25 6,295]

23 minutes ago, KathywithaC said:

The “pursuit” of Stevens was a cluster F from the start, so much so that it never should’ve occurred. A few people thought they could move mountains and didn’t want to listen to anyone but themselves.

Sorry I call complete BS on that statement.  While Stevens may have been a low odds longshot, you miss 100% of the shots you don't take.  Dude gets major kudos from me for have the gonads to take the shot.  It's not his fault the powers that be at IU are a bunch of idiots.  What is it that Cig says -- NO SELF IMPOSED LIMITATIONS.  

[Stuhoo 85,709]

 

[ap2345 10,336]

8 minutes ago, Golfman25 said:

Sorry I call complete BS on that statement.  While Stevens may have been a low odds longshot, you miss 100% of the shots you don't take.  Dude gets major kudos from me for have the gonads to take the shot.  It's not his fault the powers that be at IU are a bunch of idiots.  What is it that Cig says -- NO SELF IMPOSED LIMITATIONS.  

I think she probably means about what went on that caused it be a cluster. This time everyone needs to get out of the way and let Scott do the search and communication.

[WayneFleekHoosier 49,948]

Just now, ap2345 said:

I think she probably means about what went on that caused it be a cluster 

Should we try again in a few months?  lol