Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Class of '66 Old Fart

IUBB vs Iowa - Tuesday, 01.30.24 @ 7:00 on BTN

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

With Mack playing mostly at the three, he is guarded by a lot of guys four or five inches shorter than he is. If that's a positive matchup for IU? I can see the value in inverting the offense to pull Ware and Malik outside and put Mack in the post. 

For instance,

  • I'd rather have Mack with a post catch against Loyer than have KelEl with a post catch against Edey. 
  • I'd rather have Mack with a post catch against Akins than Ware with a post catch against Sissoko.
  • I'd rather have Mack with a post catch against Berry than Ware with a post catch against Nicholson.

That having been said, Mailk is always our best option for post touches, but Malik doubled is sometimes not awesome, and Mack likely would not draw a double.

Sure... But that isn't happening. It's with Mbako playing the 4. Not with him playing the 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though it resulted in a lose, we need build off of that game.  Despite not hitting any 3’s and our poor free throw shooting, there were positives from that Illinois game. I say we build us some confidence and beat Fran and the Franatics by double digits 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, hper50 said:

I was begging us to offer Perkins when he was at Lawrence North. Another non-offered Indiana kid who will give us the business..........

Tough and gritty! I like those kinds of players!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It saddens me that our program has fallen so far that we don't consider home games against Northwestern and Nebraska automatic wins. IMO we should win all of our home games with the possible exception being against top 5 teams in the nation.  Even in those games, we should be as competitive as hell.  We must hold our team and coach to this standard.  
Yep but it's reality. We don't play modern bbal and you can't win many games not hitting threes.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, FortWayneHoosier said:

 

 

I guess where I am at with it, is Mack is supposed to be a shooter. We already have two big men, why clog the lane up more. Also the "down the stretch" makes no sense. This whole board has complained and cried that we haven't created or ran any sets for Mack, so now everyone is ok with putting him in the post. I know we haven't put up a ton of 3's this year, but it kind of defeats the purpose in the long run if you are going to recruit guys that are shooters and put them in the post. 

Man …I’m so far gone in my assumptions, when I read that I just assumed Woody meant playing him as a stretch 4 (ie a post position in traditional parlance).  
 

If Woody is actually going to run post ups for him, I’m going to pull my hair out.  
 

(stuhoo makes so nice points but those are very limited/niche circumstances that could 1) apply to other people and 2) require us to get our multiple post players out of the lane)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, str8baller said:

Man …I’m so far gone in my assumptions, when I read that I just assumed Woody meant playing him as a stretch 4 (ie a post position in traditional parlance).  
 

If Woody is actually going to run post ups for him, I’m going to pull my hair out.  
 

(stuhoo makes so nice points but those are very limited/niche circumstances that could 1) apply to other people and 2) require us to get our multiple post players out of the lane)

That is how I interpreted his statement as well, hence my response. He very well could of meant a stretch 4, but I feel he means it in a different way. All in all it still makes 0 sense to me, but I never claimed to be an expert. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To watch or not to watch? That is the question.
Thank you Sir….. May I have another?!?
It’s winter. Nothing else to do.
Regardless.
GO HOOSIERS!!
I'll always watch. I may not like the product nowadays, but I still love the Hoosiers.

Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×