Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Hoosierfan2017

They Fired Tom Allen!

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, DChoosier said:

I don’t think the applicant list would thin out at all if the administration was willing to throw around 5-8 million a year. We would tell the applicants that Tom’s service was deeply appreciated but in order to make the “next step” it was time to move on. The applicants would piously nod their heads in agreement but then ask if we were offering 5 or 8 million per and for how many years.

That being said…..if we win 4 in a row and then win a bowl (highly unlikely) there is zero chance we would fire Allen with a 20,000,000 payout.

The next step for IU football is getting to crappy bowl games and winning them. In our hypothetical scenario, we would have just fired a coach who did exactly that and in a 5 season stretch, had 3 winning seasons, played in 2 January bowl games, won our first bowl game since ‘91, had us ranked in the top 10 at one point. I have my own thoughts on TA. Put all the qualifiers and asterisks on the COVID season, I get it. But this is arguably the worst program in major college football. I don’t care how much money we are offering, that would be one of the biggest “who the hell do you think you are?” moments in sports history to fire that coach. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Lebowski said:

My question was hypothetical and you are free to answer if you desire. 

If this year's IUFB team goes bowling and wins said bowl game; still want him gone? 

I would still want him gone, but would understand why that wouldn’t happen this year, celebrate the HELL out of a bowl win and find 8 possible wins on the schedule for 2024.

I feel like it’s pretty reasonable to admit that it’s a complicated situation with some serious nuance, which unfortunately isn’t a strong suit for message boards typically. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand they’re not actually going to fire him if IU wins a bowl game this year. But the question was whether I would want him fired if that happens, and frankly there’s nothing Tom Allen could do that wouldn’t make me want IU to fire him after this season. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Lebowski said:

My question was hypothetical and you are free to answer if you desire. 

If this year's IUFB team goes bowling and wins said bowl game; still want him gone? 

That's a hard one. I DO want him gone... but it would make it incredibly hard to get a decent coach if, after years of struggling, we fire the guy who gets us bowling again... but, big picture and hope for the future? YES. Can his @$$.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, DChoosier said:

I don’t think the applicant list would thin out at all if the administration was willing to throw around 5-8 million a year. We would tell the applicants that Tom’s service was deeply appreciated but in order to make the “next step” it was time to move on. The applicants would piously nod their heads in agreement but then ask if we were offering 5 or 8 million per and for how many years.

That being said…..if we win 4 in a row and then win a bowl (highly unlikely) there is zero chance we would fire Allen with a 20,000,000 payout.

If we made a bowl game, Allen would automatically get a 1 year extension so the buyout would be even more. I would guess that it would be about $25-26M now then $20M through the end of next season like it is now. So even just making the bowl game eliminates the chance that Allen would lose his job purely from a financial aspect.

Even if they just get close to a bowl game I can see Dolson not firing him this year, saying some crap like, "It was a tough season but there was improvement which gives us confidence next year will be better."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If we made a bowl game, Allen would automatically get a 1 year extension so the buyout would be even more. I would guess that it would be about $25-26M now then $20M through the end of next season like it is now. So even just making the bowl game eliminates the chance that Allen would lose his job purely from a financial aspect.
Even if they just get close to a bowl game I can see Dolson not firing him this year, saying some crap like, "It was a tough season but there was improvement which gives us confidence next year will be better."
That is my question. Does the buyout continue to expand with each potential extension as if on a sliding scale? Or is it tied to calendar year?

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re:  winning a bowl game (hard for me to even type that) and the automatic 1-year contract extension CTA would get.

Should that happen, does the buyout continue to decline per the original contract terms or is it frozen for a year because of the extension and then begin to decline per the original contract terms?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

Re:  winning a bowl game (hard for me to even type that) and the automatic 1-year contract extension CTA would get.

Should that happen, does the buyout continue to decline per the original contract terms or is it frozen for a year because of the extension and then begin to decline per the original contract terms?

Oh, is it winning a bowl game that triggers the automatic extension? That makes me feel much better since I thought it was just making a bowl game that did.

I don't know about the financial aspect but I'm assuming the worst since it's a terrible contract already. I know it drops from 100% remaining salary to something like 50% but I don't know if that is a set date or x-many years from the end of the contract. Again, I assume the worst which would be the latter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, thebigweave said:

That is my question. Does the buyout continue to expand with each potential extension as if on a sliding scale? Or is it tied to calendar year?

Sent from my SM-G991U1 using BtownBanners mobile app
 

I don't know. I just assume the worst since it's a very bad contract from IU's perspective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, go iu bb said:

Oh, is it winning a bowl game that triggers the automatic extension? That makes me feel much better since I thought it was just making a bowl game that did.

It is making a bowl, not winning. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

via IndyStar:
 

If the university wished to terminate Allen any time before Dec. 1, 2024, it would owe him all remaining base, deferred and outside, marketing and promotional income (OMPI). If, for example, he were to be fired without cause following the 2023 season, Indiana University would still owe him more than $20 million.

Beginning Dec. 1, 2024, IU’s duty falls to just 50% of that remaining income, a substantially smaller amount. Termination on that date, for example, would require the university to pay Allen a little under $8 million, and that number would fall under $6 million a year later. Any bowl-triggered extension years would remain in this bucket, for buyout purposes. Allen is scheduled to receive a $100,000 raise via OMPI in any such extension year.
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hovadipo said:

via IndyStar:
 

If the university wished to terminate Allen any time before Dec. 1, 2024, it would owe him all remaining base, deferred and outside, marketing and promotional income (OMPI). If, for example, he were to be fired without cause following the 2023 season, Indiana University would still owe him more than $20 million.

Beginning Dec. 1, 2024, IU’s duty falls to just 50% of that remaining income, a substantially smaller amount. Termination on that date, for example, would require the university to pay Allen a little under $8 million, and that number would fall under $6 million a year later. Any bowl-triggered extension years would remain in this bucket, for buyout purposes. Allen is scheduled to receive a $100,000 raise via OMPI in any such extension year.
 

 

What the hell was Dolson smoking when he did that contract extension?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, NashvilleHoosier said:

The next step for IU football is getting to crappy bowl games and winning them. In our hypothetical scenario, we would have just fired a coach who did exactly that and in a 5 season stretch, had 3 winning seasons, played in 2 January bowl games, won our first bowl game since ‘91, had us ranked in the top 10 at one point. I have my own thoughts on TA. Put all the qualifiers and asterisks on the COVID season, I get it. But this is arguably the worst program in major college football. I don’t care how much money we are offering, that would be one of the biggest “who the hell do you think you are?” moments in sports history to fire that coach. 

We have not won a bowl game since '91.  CTA has won three BIG games in three years, including yesterday's win. That's not good. I will say if he gets us to 5 or 6 wins he probably doesn't not get canned (especially 6). But let's be real honest, he hasn't shown us much as a head coach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hovadipo said:

via IndyStar:
 

If the university wished to terminate Allen any time before Dec. 1, 2024, it would owe him all remaining base, deferred and outside, marketing and promotional income (OMPI). If, for example, he were to be fired without cause following the 2023 season, Indiana University would still owe him more than $20 million.

Beginning Dec. 1, 2024, IU’s duty falls to just 50% of that remaining income, a substantially smaller amount. Termination on that date, for example, would require the university to pay Allen a little under $8 million, and that number would fall under $6 million a year later. Any bowl-triggered extension years would remain in this bucket, for buyout purposes. Allen is scheduled to receive a $100,000 raise via OMPI in any such extension year.
 

 

I was looking it up the same time as you; I saw Osterman's article you posted but I saw the contrary from Rittenberg (ESPN).

Indiana would owe Allen all of his remaining compensation if it fires the coach without cause before Dec. 1, 2024. The school would owe Allen 50% of his remaining compensation in the final three years of the agreement, and 100% of his compensation for years tacked on in future contract extensions.

Serious question, what is IUFB's APR? Since there's a thousand bowls now, they go to 5-7 teams if there aren't enough FBS teams with 6+ wins. I believe the succession order is based on either prior season or 3 year rolling APR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, LIHoosier said:

I was looking it up the same time as you; I saw Osterman's article you posted but I saw the contrary from Rittenberg (ESPN).

Indiana would owe Allen all of his remaining compensation if it fires the coach without cause before Dec. 1, 2024. The school would owe Allen 50% of his remaining compensation in the final three years of the agreement, and 100% of his compensation for years tacked on in future contract extensions.

Serious question, what is IUFB's APR? Since there's a thousand bowls now, they go to 5-7 teams if there aren't enough FBS teams with 6+ wins. I believe the succession order is based on either prior season or 3 year rolling APR.

I seem to remember seeing an APR list for 5-win bowl teams a year or two ago and if IU had got to that mark, they’d have been pretty high on the list to get a bowl invite. 

(Also, strange that Rittenberg and Osterman are on the total opposite sides of the evergreen deal buyout deets. Maybe we can get one of our board lawyers to dive in pro bono)

Edit: IU’s APR was ranked 46th last year. Didn’t tally it up, but a majority of teams ahead of us were either 6+ win teams or completely terrible. In the next couple of weeks I’d expect bowl projectors to start running those numbers. The article I found was dated Nov. 22. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, LIHoosier said:

I was looking it up the same time as you; I saw Osterman's article you posted but I saw the contrary from Rittenberg (ESPN).

Indiana would owe Allen all of his remaining compensation if it fires the coach without cause before Dec. 1, 2024. The school would owe Allen 50% of his remaining compensation in the final three years of the agreement, and 100% of his compensation for years tacked on in future contract extensions.

Serious question, what is IUFB's APR? Since there's a thousand bowls now, they go to 5-7 teams if there aren't enough FBS teams with 6+ wins. I believe the succession order is based on either prior season or 3 year rolling APR.

I know it wouldn't happen, but when a big part of the job is winning games the last few years should count as cause.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×