Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Uspshoosier

Bracketology and Team Resumes

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, mdn82 said:

A lot could be said for taking people with that level of financial gain potential out of the decision making process.  

IMG_7835.jpeg

Anyone that thinks that there was not a wink, wink, nod, nod, or at least an implied pressure while he was in the corner, covering his eyes and ears is a fool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Yeah, but how will the adjust to devries recent injury?

He only played 8 games.  They still won more Q1 games than UNC without him.    No justification for leaving them out for UNC.  West  Virginia got hosed worse than anyone I can remember.    Seems lately they have put a borderline Acc team in the first 4 that was on the bubble.   Should of known to include UNC but couldn’t bring myself to do it with that resume 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a weird year for the committee. We didn’t deserve to get in anyway IMO. Snubbing WVU over DeVries injury is crazy for UNC. I get on paper our resume probably had valid arguments but the whole no non-Q1 losses thing loses merit with me considering we were blown out in a good number of them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, mdn82 said:

A lot could be said for taking people with that level of financial gain potential out of the decision making process.  

IMG_7835.jpeg

Hey guys, I'm gonna leave the room when you discuss my Tar Heels. But when I come back -- if we happen to be in the field ... 

DINNER AND DRINKS ARE ON ME!!! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Uspshoosier said:

He only played 8 games.  They still won more Q1 games than UNC without him.    No justification for leaving them out for UNC.  West  Virginia got hosed worse than anyone I can remember.    Seems lately they have put a borderline Acc team in the first 4 that was on the bubble.   Should of known to include UNC but couldn’t bring myself to do it with that resume 

Agreed.  IU I could be talked into either direction.  But UNC over WVU, and trying to act like it was due to that injury?  What are we doing here?  That is just absurd and with that statement shows what this was all about.  Really disappointing and a lot could be said about hiring 12-15 people with the passion you have and no financial upside determining who makes it.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Home Jersey said:

What a weird year for the committee. We didn’t deserve to get in anyway IMO. Snubbing WVU over DeVries injury is crazy for UNC. I get on paper our resume probably had valid arguments but the whole no non-Q1 losses thing loses merit with me considering we were blown out in a good number of them. 

Probably not a bad thing in the long run. Let UNC prop up Davis for far too long. He can be there Davis/Crean and keep them out of contention for a decade-plus. 
 

Looking at the 4/5 seeds we were going to be one and done most likely anyways.  
 

Woodsons penchant for getting blown out in nonconf games makes everything else look bad. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should have been in but that's the risk you take when you put yourself on the bubble.  Could have easily been avoided if they had been able to close out 1 or 2 of the games they lost that were there for the taking vs Oregon, Maryland, UCLA, Purdue, Michigan, and Northwestern.

Getting absolutely blown out by Louisville, Gonzaga, Nebraska, Illinois, Iowa, and Wisconsin had to really hurt the metrics too.

Team was way too talented to find themselves on the bubble but they got what they earned

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, mdn82 said:

A lot could be said for taking people with that level of financial gain potential out of the decision making process.  

IMG_7835.jpeg

Is anyone surprised that the AD of UNC is corrupt? This is the school of fake classes, after all. Besides, if IU's administration can be corrupt, it makes sense that the administrations at schools like UNC would be too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bracket Matrix results are up. Morrie Lunardi finished T-109th of 249.

Everyone's favorite Bowl Cut was 235th. That's 15th from the WORST. 

For the love of everything, just retire.

P.S. I knew that dingbat having us as a 10 seed last week was a damn hex.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×