Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Interesting but I don't see much truth in any of it....

He says it is based on logic... I guess his logic is MUCH different than mine (and the majority of the fanbase)

He says it isn't pre-planned but based on the flow of the game (Not the same games I am watching)

Its a 40 minute game, and college players are young men, they are not going to hit that wall by playing 36 minutes but not hit the wall by playing 30.... they can power through those last 6 minutes, and on a good night when they are on fire the adrenaline will carry them for 40.....

The 1 part I agree with is he says he isn't living in the moment, play by play... We can all see that.... he thinks he is thinking long term for the end of the game but the plays at the 8 minute mark are just as important as the 1 minute mark (Not always but you get my point).

Posted

I think I understood Crean's substitutions more before I read the article than after I did lol.

I disagree completely with him, though, when he said "I know what happens when they hit that wall. We have to make sure they don’t hit that wall. Get them that rest so we can put them back in and they’ll be good. We have a 40-minute game minimum. We’re not living in the moment as much as it's play by play. We still have to plan ahead for the end of the game.”

You work on that during off season conditioning. During preseason conditioning. These guys are 18-22 years old. This isn't the NBA where they are playing back-to-backs. They get 2-3 days between games at a minimum. There are NBA players their age putting up 35 minutes a night, 82 nights a year. There's no reason our starters shouldn't be able to give 32-35 minutes a game, and honestly I think they feel the same way. Players want to be out there playing as much as possible, and there's a good chance his methods hurt us with the top recruits. They're not coming to college to play 20-25 minutes a night. Having fresh players doesn't help us when they're spending half the game on the bench. 

Posted

This article just furthers my belief in the rumors that Crean is an ego maniac. I can't imagine that in 19 years, not a single person close to Crean has suggested to abandon his subbing strategy. I can't think of a single championship caliber coach to have success with this strategy. For being a guy that pays such close attention to advanced statistics, he sure misses some very obvious stats that clearly highlight deficiency. I wish he would stop trying to reinvent the wheel. Zero in on what the greats are doing and replicate the process. Seems as though he's not as committed to growing and improving at the rate he expects of his players.

Posted

I understand about having "fresh legs" for the game, but I think being sent to the bench when you're scoring and/ or making defensive stops would be frustrating to a player!  A couple of years ago, Troy was in the middle of a good spell.  He was fouled in the act of shooting.  He hits his first free throw and sees that coach is making a substitution.  I can't remember who was waiting to come in for him after he was to hit the second shot, but it never happened.  He bricked the second and game continued.  It wasn't the right thing to do, but I understand why he did it.  

I'm of the opinion that if a player causes an unforced turnover, substituting that player out for a brief period would help restore them physically and mentally.  As many turnovers as this team makes, there should be plenty of opportunity to sub out ; thus, avoid hitting the wall.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...