Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Hovadipo

College Football Thread

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Lebowski said:

Yeah, I didn't get any of that out of it. After a grand total of... 4 games the writer goes off on the coach for what? Being 2-2? Losing by big margins? Having a girlfriend that finds 70+ year old men attractive? 

His legacy? Prior to Tom Brady, his head coaching career record was 41-55 .427. After Tom Brady, his head coaching record, including UNC, is 31-40 .436. His total record without Tom Brady on his roster is a grand total of 72-95 .431. I'd say without a certain player he doesn't really have a legacy to tarnish. Who's really laughing? The country or just the impatient keyboard warriors wanting instant gratification after 4 games into a 1st year coach with a complete overhaul of a roster along with the way the program used to run things? What fiasco? It's 4 games into his 1st season. How much money is spent on every player at every P4 school? 

I'd fully understand if this writer wanted to criticize the university because they hired a below average coach without a certain player on his roster. But personally, I still wouldn't criticize the university this early. It's only 4 games into this experiment. 

It's a hit piece and the guy writing it comes of as ****** bag with some sort of personal vendetta. To what exactly, I'm not sure. At least that's what I got of the the column. But that's just me. 

You are entitled to your opinion.  I just don't agree with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DChoosier said:

Well……#8 FSU goes down at UVA in overtime (in regulation FSU scored on 4th and 11 to force the OT).

Has zero to do with our game vs Iowa but for some nonsensical reason it makes me nervous about our trip to Iowa. 

Conference road games are usually tough. They're supposed to be tough. We would do well to remember that tomorrow when it's halftime and we're not up 28-3. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, LIHoosier said:

UVA upsets FSU in OT! The $EC mathemagicians are gonna have a long weekend making Bama's Florida St loss look better.

Sent from my SM-X210 using BtownBanners mobile app
 

Hate to disagree but it won’t be a long weekend for the $EC mathemagicians.

The formula is simple.

Alabama lost to a top ten opponent (FSU) so Bama gets bonus points the rest of the season even though they lost.

And then tomorrows Bama-Ga game:

Georgia is number 5 and Alabama is 17th so if Georgia wins they go to 4th or higher and Bama should rise to 10th or 12th for losing to such a good team.

If Alabama wins they go to 4th which means Georgia actually lost to the 4th ranked team (not 17th) so Georgia only falls to 6th.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Lebowski said:

Yeah, I didn't get any of that out of it. After a grand total of... 4 games the writer goes off on the coach for what? Being 2-2? Losing by big margins? Having a girlfriend that finds 70+ year old men attractive? 

His legacy? Prior to Tom Brady, his head coaching career record was 41-55 .427. After Tom Brady, his head coaching record, including UNC, is 31-40 .436. His total record without Tom Brady on his roster is a grand total of 72-95 .431. I'd say without a certain player he doesn't really have a legacy to tarnish. Who's really laughing? The country or just the impatient keyboard warriors wanting instant gratification after 4 games into a 1st year coach with a complete overhaul of a roster along with the way the program used to run things? What fiasco? It's 4 games into his 1st season. How much money is spent on every player at every P4 school? 

I'd fully understand if this writer wanted to criticize the university because they hired a below average coach without a certain player on his roster. But personally, I still wouldn't criticize the university this early. It's only 4 games into this experiment. 

It's a hit piece and the guy writing it comes of as ****** bag with some sort of personal vendetta. To what exactly, I'm not sure. At least that's what I got of the the column. But that's just me. 

I get your point, but to give all the credit to Tom Brady seems really lazy.  Those teams were stacked with talent.  Rodney Harrison, Ty Law, Richard Seymour, Vince Wilfork, Willie McGinest, Mike Vrabel, Adam Vinatieri, Ted Bruschi, Rob Gronkowski...I mean damn.  Those teams were stacked.

I'm sure you know that, but it really irks me when people just give all the credit to the quarterback. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Josh said:

I get your point, but to give all the credit to Tom Brady seems really lazy.  Those teams were stacked with talent.  Rodney Harrison, Ty Law, Richard Seymour, Vince Wilfork, Willie McGinest, Mike Vrabel, Adam Vinatieri, Ted Bruschi, Rob Gronkowski...I mean damn.  Those teams were stacked.

I'm sure you know that, but it really irks me when people just give all the credit to the quarterback. 

I don’t think it all goes to the quarterback but it’s certainly telling that belichick never had success without Brady.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, DChoosier said:

Hate to disagree but it won’t be a long weekend for the $EC mathemagicians.

The formula is simple.

Alabama lost to a top ten opponent (FSU) so Bama gets bonus points the rest of the season even though they lost.

And then tomorrows Bama-Ga game:

Georgia is number 5 and Alabama is 17th so if Georgia wins they go to 4th or higher and Bama should rise to 10th or 12th for losing to such a good team.

If Alabama wins they go to 4th which means Georgia actually lost to the 4th ranked team (not 17th) so Georgia only falls to 6th.

image.jpeg.b0b7eaed5d82607c19ccb0d0fee8bb52.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

I don’t think it all goes to the quarterback but it’s certainly telling that belichick never had success without Brady*

*and the rest of the studs on those teams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Brass Cannon said:

Normally I’d say that’s true. But dude is getting paid more than coach cig.  Expectations should be sky high and failure to achieve them should be called out 

I don't disagree with expectations. But instant gratification type of expectations isn't really evaluating someone's own reality.  4 games. He's currently 2-2. Way way way too early for this type of column.  It's poor taste and should be called out.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, rayl456 said:

Virginia is about to take down Florida State.  Maybe dropping them from our schedule wasn’t such a bad idea?  Or maybe it was?  How do we feel about that decision now?

Get back to me when we get credit for beating anybody. We could beat Virginia 63-10 next week and the narrative would be “Virginia’s a nobody.”  Until that changes, I’m on the side of “just win games.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Lebowski said:

I don't disagree with expectations. But instant gratification type of expectations isn't really evaluating someone's own reality.  4 games. He's currently 2-2. Way way way too early for this type of column.  It's poor taste and should be called out.  

Disagree modern college athletics allow you to win year 1 and he got paid win now money. And he isn’t winning now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×