Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

IUc2016

NCAA MBB Transfer Portal

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:
  • Composite rated 172. 
  • Extremely skinny -- I've seen 6'9", 180.
  • Talented, but one of the reasons he is ranked low is supposedly because he is immature (even for an 18 year old). 

I other words, exactly what will not help Kentucky. It gets them closer to being able to play 5 v 5 in practice, but leaves them with six freshmen, and two sophs who averaged less than 10 mpg last year.  Mulcahy would be a home run for them, but I wonder if he's even interested in dealing with a team that will need to be babysat by him as a veteran player, when he would have to do so without any help from other veteran players.

Given that Burks was a Kermit Davis recruit, if that’s an accurate eval of the kid then I’m guessing the “de-commitment” was Beard saying, “Yeah, no.” That couldn’t sound less like his kind of player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean, holy crap. This commitment video is priceless. The assortment of hats. The Cliff Alexander style - "I'm snapping like a Gator ...naw" before he picks up the Kentucky hat. The random product placement.

The quotes:

  • "I wanna play for the coach. He just happened to coach (points to UK hat on his head) at this school. So I be a Wildcat."
  • Question: "What's the best part of that historical campus?" Answer: "The practice facility is like, ten steps from where you lay your head. I'm not gonna lie. That's the best thing."

 

c0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

I mean, holy crap. This commitment video is priceless. The assortment of hats, the product placement.

The quotes:

  • "I wanna play for the coach. He just happened to coach (points to UK hat on his head) at this school. So I be a Wildcat."
  • Question: "What's the best part of that historical campus?" Answer: "The practice facility is like, ten steps from where you lay your head. I'm not gonna lie. That's the best thing."

 

c0

I mean... Definitely not normal for Cal to be recruiting these kids... There's playing time up for grabs at arguably the biggest brand in the sport. No need to actually no anything about Kentucky.. they are losers anyways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trilly Donovan alluding to Wilcher committing to St. John's.

This would put St. John's over the scholarship limit.  I believe I had heard rumors at one point that there were potential issues with one of their transfer players -- I believe it was Daniss Jenkins, who transferred from Iona to St. John's.  Averaged 15.6 points, 4.4 rebounds, and 4.9 assists.  If it's not because of a transfer issue, bringing in a 14th scholarship player and then bumping someone else he recruited would be a pretty shitty thing to do this late in the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Trilly Donovan alluding to Wilcher committing to St. John's.

This would put St. John's over the scholarship limit.  I believe I had heard rumors at one point that there were potential issues with one of their transfer players -- I believe it was Daniss Jenkins, who transferred from Iona to St. John's.  Averaged 15.6 points, 4.4 rebounds, and 4.9 assists.  If it's not because of a transfer issue, bringing in a 14th scholarship player and then bumping someone else he recruited would be a pretty shitty thing to do this late in the game.

That would be so incredibly out of character for Pitino... :D 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, AZ Hoosier said:

That would be so incredibly out of character for Pitino... :D 

What's funny is that on St. John's message boards they just say 'the 14th scholarship will just come from NIL money and that player will be a walk on.'  Totally avoids two issues:  1.  The NCAA would love to find PItino liable for a violation and the university can't just promise a recruit NIL money instead of tuition 2.  You can't keep 14 guys happy....especially when 13 of those guys just transferred/committed to your school.

14th guys on a team simply aren't making much NIL money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

What's funny is that on St. John's message boards they just say 'the 14th scholarship will just come from NIL money and that player will be a walk on.'  Totally avoids two issues:  1.  The NCAA would love to find PItino liable for a violation and the university can't just promise a recruit NIL money instead of tuition 2.  You can't keep 14 guys happy....especially when 13 of those guys just transferred/committed to your school.

14th guys on a team simply aren't making much NIL money.

I'd argue it's hard to keep 11-13 happy let alone sometimes the guys 1-10.  Nowadays, I'm not sure how you keep 11-13 happy besides setting the expectations, but even then.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

I'd argue it's hard to keep 11-13 happy let alone sometimes the guys 1-10.  Nowadays, I'm not sure how you keep 11-13 happy besides setting the expectations, but even then.  

In a perfect world the way it works out is with:

  • Injuries, 
  • A freshman or two that understand coming in that they will have little chance of seeing the floor (like Joey Hart if he comes to IU), or
  • A player or two like Anthony Leal who are thrilled simply to be at the program because of the university.

If our 11-13 this year are Leal, Hart, and either a not-ready health-wise Newton (I hope that's not it) or an unexpected injury (I hope that's not it either), we will have a deep and happy roster. If we are fortunate enough to have only Leal and Hart/empty spot unavailable? That 11th guy is likely to be a frustrated player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

In a perfect world the way it works out is with:

  • Injuries, 
  • A freshman or two that understand coming in that they will have little chance of seeing the floor (like Joey Hart if he comes to IU), or
  • A player or two like Anthony Leal who are thrilled simply to be at the program because of the university.

If our 11-13 this year are Leal, Hart, and either a not-ready health-wise Newton (I hope that's not it) or an unexpected injury (I hope that's not it either), we will have a deep and happy roster. If we are fortunate enough to have only Leal and Hart/empty spot unavailable? That 11th guy is likely to be a frustrated player.

Understood... but the goal is not to get a 11-13 player, but to get a 5-8 player and then everyone gets bumped back a spot... with the exception of a guy like Leal, what coach is actively recruiting a player projected to fall that low on the depth chart? And then there's the "preferred walk-on" players - that, too, is a special kind of lunacy...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, AZ Hoosier said:

Understood... but the goal is not to get a 11-13 player, but to get a 5-8 player and then everyone gets bumped back a spot... with the exception of a guy like Leal, what coach is actively recruiting a player projected to fall that low on the depth chart? And then there's the "preferred walk-on" players - that, too, is a special kind of lunacy...

So, if we get Reeves and everyone is healthy and expecting/hoping to play except for Leal, who understands his role?

We will have two-four players who are frustrated and will strongly consider 'portaling' after the season. That's what motivated Lander, Duncomb, and Geronimo to transfer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

I'd argue it's hard to keep 11-13 happy let alone sometimes the guys 1-10.  Nowadays, I'm not sure how you keep 11-13 happy besides setting the expectations, but even then.  

+1.  The group that Pitino has put together is Soriano, Dingle and s bunch of guys.  We’ll see how Dingle translates, but so many of the players he’s put together are redundant.  Wilcher makes sense because he has four years but having 14 scholarship guys at this point doesn’t.  I’m thinking the Daniss Jenkins rumors might have some legs and there are transfer issues with him.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

So, if we get Reeves and everyone is healthy and expecting/hoping to play except for Leal, who understands his role?

We will have two-four players who are frustrated and will strongly consider 'portaling' after the season. That's what motivated Lander, Duncomb, and Geronimo to transfer.

Yep. If Reeves will come and make IU better, you have to do it, despite hurt feelings and diminished opportunities for current players. 

I prefer the traditional dymnamic of building a team and developing players over time, but like much in our society that is a thing of the past. We prefer "right now" over what is "right", so guys will leave and a new crop will come in. Sometimes for good reasons, sometimes not. Let's hope IU has the right ingredients for a special season. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Hardwood83 said:

Yep. If Reeves will come and make IU better, you have to do it, despite hurt feelings and diminished opportunities for current players. 

I prefer the traditional dymnamic of building a team and developing players over time, but like much in our society that is a thing of the past. We prefer "right now" over what is "right", so guys will leave and a new crop will come in. Sometimes for good reasons, sometimes not. Let's hope IU has the right ingredients for a special season. 

Agree with your first point completely.

As for your second point? I'm pretty sure that in the 'good old days' when Keith Smart and Dean Garrett parachuted into Bloomington, "developed" three year or more players like Todd Meier, Magnus Pelkowski, Steve Eyl, Kreigh Smith, and Brian Sloan thought to themselves; "Sh!t, I guess I'm not playing much this year after all."  And if the transfer rules didn't require them to sit out a year to play their senior year? It's a reasonable assumption that a few of them would have been gonzo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Stuhoo said:

Agree with your first point completely.

As for your second point? I'm pretty sure that when Keith Smart and Dean Garrett parachuted into Bloomington, "developed" three year or more players like Todd Meier, Steve Eyl, Kreigh Smith, and Brian Sloan thought to themselves; "Sh!t, I guess I'm not playing much this year after all." 

Absolutely, was never a perfect world, just now with the ease of ejecting the guys that could develop (Gunn for example) are much more likely to bolt. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardwood83 said:

Absolutely, was never a perfect world, just now with the ease of ejecting the guys that could develop (Gunn for example) are much more likely to bolt. 

Although we've had some in-state kids bolt, to me it's still far more likely that the out of state kids will bolt if they don't see a rotation role for themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can’t worry too much about playing time and the portal though.  The best and better players will play.  Almost all players will get chances in games and in practice it should be fairly obvious where the chips lie.  I mean, we want great chemistry but all teams have hiccups.  Win at a high enough level things will work out.  
 

Duncomb, Bates, Geronimo is a pretty nice set of players.  They ended up at Mizzou, Xavier, Maryland to good programs and good coaches.  We like the guys we got in return.  This will likely be an annual trend to an extent. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, AZ Hoosier said:

Understood... but the goal is not to get a 11-13 player, but to get a 5-8 player and then everyone gets bumped back a spot... with the exception of a guy like Leal, what coach is actively recruiting a player projected to fall that low on the depth chart? And then there's the "preferred walk-on" players - that, too, is a special kind of lunacy...

If you try to get all 4 and 4 star players you won't ever use all 13 scholarships.  Most teams don't use all 13 anyways especially teams like UK, Duke and KU or most of the top teams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×