Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Nova is clearly the better team, but I think Wagner is a guy that gives Michigan a chance. He’s such a good all around player, can shoot, dribble, pass, etc., and has the chance to sort of neutralize or even outplay Spellman. Nova’s guards are definitely way better, but Michigan does have a chance. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, BGleas said:

Nova is clearly the better team, but I think Wagner is a guy that gives Michigan a chance. He’s such a good all around player, can shoot, dribble, pass, etc., and has the chance to sort of neutralize or even outplay Spellman. Nova’s guards are definitely way better, but Michigan does have a chance. 

Agree 

Posted
Nova is clearly the better team, but I think Wagner is a guy that gives Michigan a chance. He’s such a good all around player, can shoot, dribble, pass, etc., and has the chance to sort of neutralize or even outplay Spellman. Nova’s guards are definitely way better, but Michigan does have a chance. 
Glad to see Kansas lose. Villanova should beat Michigan easily unless they have a total off night.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

Posted
2 minutes ago, Walking Boot of Doom said:


There’s more than one way to win. DD can be a key to winning in one system and unnecessary in another.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Wouldn't disagree with that.. it's not a system I prefer.. but there have been multiple ppl say we have to have a low block presence and all that jazz, no we dont have to have one. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, btownqb said:

Wouldn't disagree with that.. it's not a system I prefer.. but there have been multiple ppl say we have to have a low block presence and all that jazz, no we dont have to have one. 

We do he's just not the right one. Our offense worked much better with him for a reason. 

Posted
35 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

We do he's just not the right one. Our offense worked much better with him for a reason. 

But it didn't? We were better without him. Offensively that is. 

Posted
43 minutes ago, cljones1979 said:


Yes but our defense was a lot better after. His size is good on offense but he is too slow for archie's defense

Sent from my SM-G955U using BtownBanners mobile app
 

No I know. But to say we don't need a player with his skill down low is just ridiculous. Just need one that fits the defensive scheme better

Posted
2 hours ago, Brass Cannon said:

No I know. But to say we don't need a player with his skill down low is just ridiculous. Just need one that fits the defensive scheme better

If he isn't a dribble drive threat I'm not interested. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...