Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, X-Hoosier said:

We also sucked early on last year. Hopefully the returnees remember that.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app

It's like I told people, Bellarmine is no slouch.  Top D2 program every year, and incredible fundamentals and IQ to help keep the game close.  Now, IU sucked against them, but Bellarmine is a good team.  I get the pleasure of watching them because they play in the same conference as the university my wife works at.  

Posted
It's like I told people, Bellarmine is no slouch.  Top D2 program every year, and incredible fundamentals and IQ to help keep the game close.  Now, IU sucked against them, but Bellarmine is a good team.  I get the pleasure of watching them because they play in the same conference as the university my wife works at.  

That is fine. But beating them by 20+ should be expected.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted

It has little to do with the top end. There won't be many B1G teams that will play top teams like that. It's the bottom end. If there are a few more games in the 100-200 range, a few in the 201-300, and none in the 300+ range that's a top 20ish OOC SOS.

Adding 2 more games against top 25ish teams will only do so much for you when you have 7, SEVEN games against 273+ teams. That's laughable! Are we preparing to play teams like Rutgers and Minnesota by these terrible noncon opponents?

I guess it's just padding stats so when we go into conference play with an OOC SOS in the 8+ averaging 90 points a game with an average margin of victory of +25 it'll look good.

Posted
It has little to do with the top end. There won't be many B1G teams that will play top teams like that. It's the bottom end. If there are a few more games in the 100-200 range, a few in the 201-300, and none in the 300+ range that's a top 20ish OOC SOS.

Adding 2 more games against top 25ish teams will only do so much for you when you have 7, SEVEN games against 273+ teams. That's laughable! Are we preparing to play teams like Rutgers and Minnesota by these terrible noncon opponents?

I guess it's just padding stats so when we go into conference play with an OOC SOS in the 8+ averaging 90 points a game with an average margin of victory of +25 it'll look good.


I don't care what other teams are doing. Indiana needs to do their own thing. Play 6-8 power conference teams and keep the 250+ teams to everyone else.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted
1 minute ago, X-Hoosier said:


I don't care what other teams are doing. Indiana needs to do their own thing. Play 6-8 power conference teams and keep the 250+ teams to everyone else.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app
 

You can't go overboard with the top end teams though or you wear the team out.  There is a bit of a balancing act, you need some easy wins but you need to be challenged too.  We need to trim the fat on our OOC schedules.

Posted
You can't go overboard with the top end teams though or you wear the team out.  There is a bit of a balancing act, you need some easy wins but you need to be challenged too.  We need to trim the fat on our OOC schedules.


I didn't say 8 teams of Duke, Kentucky, Kansas, UNC, Zona, UCLA, Oregon, UConn, Louisville, Texas etc. I just said power conference. Even lower tier power conference teams will look better. Or look at teams in the Big East, MWC, or Gonzaga and BYU. Instead we are going to the SWAC and MEAC to fill our schedule.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted

I didn't say 8 teams of Duke, Kentucky, Kansas, UNC, Zona, UCLA, Oregon, UConn, Louisville, Texas etc. I just said power conference. Even lower tier power conference teams will look better. Or look at teams in the Big East, MWC, or Gonzaga and BYU. Instead we are going to the SWAC and MEAC to fill our schedule.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app


Yeah, and his point still stands. You need tune up games against some inferior competition.
Posted

I've posted for several years now that we need the following

3-4 games against top 25 teams (home, neutral, or away)
2-3 games against solid mid-majors or low power conference top 100-150 games
3-5 games against 151-250
2 games max against 250+ teams

We should never have more than half our schedule against 250+ teams. I get that things change year to year but that's just terrible.

Posted
14 minutes ago, bhaggard89 said:

Like I said before, schedule the other Indiana schools and you'll have plenty of teams on the schedule with a mid range RPI.
Here's how they ended last season.
Valpo- 31
IPFW- 74
Evansville- 92
Ball State- 159
Indiana St- 170
IUPUI- 191


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

It's crazy talk but why not play two games at home against other Indiana teams as part of the Crossroads Classic?  I do really like that we're playing IPFW up in the Fort.  The two for one with Evansville (home 2010/2013, away 2011) worked out well.  I would like to see IU play in some areas with a large alumni base (Chicago, NYC, DC) or different areas around the state in the noncon. 

Also, like last season we are really dependent on doing well against the top or our RPI will be a seed or two lower than it should be.  If we go 0fer against KU, UNC, and UL we are looking at an uphill battle again. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...