Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Fair enough in a vacuum.  But we did blow a historic 22 point lead and played one of the  worst halves of basketball I’ve witnessed. That’s embarrassing.  
 

On Wisky, it’s my eye test.  The Houston win was big. Can’t take that away.  They won several games that’s could have gone either way.  They just aren’t that good.  I think it will bare out.  
 

But the rest of my comments is where I stand because it isn’t a vacuum to me.  Unless we turn a magical corner we are a fringe tourney team.  We look like it with the eye test and every transitive property I think about.  Some people have 20 years of frustration built up and are looking for a breakthrough. We aren’t seeing it.  That and the administration are the main reasons we haven’t came back and likely won’t.   NIL opened the doors to compete with the big boys.  Another new Avenue of hope, plus a coach.  It’s not trending like we want to be a blue blood. 

It would have been better on the fanbase to have UW lead the entire way and win by 5 against Indiana. I've always been in the "just make the tournament" mindset because some of our players are average, including the point guard. IU is on track to do that as long as they don't lose to a bottom feeder and pick off a couple of quad 1 wins at home. Looks like we are on track for 8th in the Big Ten and that should get us in. And I think the NIL must be in place in some fashion. Scoop and JHS didn't commit to Indiana just to sell a few T-shirts. Just make the Dance and the program will improve with better players. 

Posted
42 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Re: eye test.  To each their own.  If you don’t believe in it, you might not have a good one. 

You totally are missing the point.  Believing in my own eyes is meaningless to anyone else.  

Everyone thinks their eyes are good.  I believe in my eyes.  You believe in your eyes.  Someone else believes in their eyes.  Saying your eyes are 'good' is a meaningless statement unless you can show someone else what you see.

 

Posted

First free throws coming up of the game with 17:53 left in the second half as UK goes to the line (funny thing was it came after a clear UK travel.....I'm sure they've missed some calls that should have resulted in free throws, but this one shouldn't have.

Posted
16 minutes ago, brumdog45 said:

You totally are missing the point.  Believing in my own eyes is meaningless to anyone else.  

Everyone thinks their eyes are good.  I believe in my eyes.  You believe in your eyes.  Someone else believes in their eyes.  Saying your eyes are 'good' is a meaningless statement unless you can show someone else what you see.

 

My eyes aren't what they used to be. So I don't put much faith in my eye test. As a side note, the longer I live, the less I think I know.

Posted
23 minutes ago, TheWatShot said:

Is UK actually playing at Notre Dame, or is it being played at whatever neutral court nearest to South Bend was available? 

In South Bend. Calipari is a hypocrite clearly.

Posted

Notre Dame wins.  Bucket at 12 seconds left put them up 2.  Driving layup by UK no good and they don't foul, ND dunk at the buzzer.

Honestly, it was a low quality game.  ND didn't do anything special -- more about what UK didn't do.  ND gave them the perimeter and UK couldn't hit.  ND able to keep rebounding even by having their guards sag and crash along with the bigs. 

Offensively, ND scored 66 mostly when UK lost their man defensively.  Really poor effort by UK.

Posted
Just now, brumdog45 said:

Notre Dame wins.  Bucket at 12 seconds left put them up 2.  Driving layup by UK no good and they don't foul, ND dunk at the buzzer.

Honestly, it was a low quality game.  ND didn't do anything special -- more about what UK didn't do.  ND gave them the perimeter and UK couldn't hit.  ND able to keep rebounding even by having their guards sag and crash along with the bigs. 

Offensively, ND scored 66 mostly when UK lost their man defensively.  Really poor effort by UK.

Yup. If IU can just go 7-19 rather than 2-19 from three they have a really good chance. 

Posted
Notre Dame wins.  Bucket at 12 seconds left put them up 2.  Driving layup by UK no good and they don't foul, ND dunk at the buzzer.
Honestly, it was a low quality game.  ND didn't do anything special -- more about what UK didn't do.  ND gave them the perimeter and UK couldn't hit.  ND able to keep rebounding even by having their guards sag and crash along with the bigs. 
Offensively, ND scored 66 mostly when UK lost their man defensively.  Really poor effort by UK.
UK was really lazy on D. Notre dame just back cut them and got what they wanted

Sent from my SM-A515U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
1 minute ago, Aaron said:

Yup. If IU can just go 7-19 rather than 2-19 from three they have a really good chance. 

Hit perimeter shots and ND can't cheat off the three point line like they did.  Also allowed ND to win the board battle as they packed it in.  UK was averaging +19 rebounds coming in and lost the board battle by 6.

Posted
2 minutes ago, maharkn said:

UK was really lazy on D. Notre dame just back cut them and got what they wanted

Sent from my SM-A515U1 using Tapatalk
 

Especially from about 8 to 2 minutes with the game in the balance.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...