Stuhoo Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 4 minutes ago, Hoosier Guy said: I really want this guy Class of '66 Old Fart, ALASKA HOOSIER and WayneFleekHoosier 3 Quote
cthomas Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 1 minute ago, Stuhoo said: Which is fine as long as you get what you need. ALASKA HOOSIER, WayneFleekHoosier, Class of '66 Old Fart and 1 other 4 Quote
Hoosier Guy Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 There’s still a realistic chance Trendon Watford comes to IU. Time will tell Quote
Stuhoo Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 11 minutes ago, cthomas said: Which is fine as long as you get what you need. 'Xactly. yogisballin 1 Quote
ElectricBoogaloo Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 Trendon is going to be a great college player. Would take him over Brooks honestly. HoosierDYT 1 Quote
cthomas Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 27 minutes ago, ElectricBoogaloo said: Trendon is going to be a great college player. Would take him over Brooks honestly. Hard to tell how they will be once they get to college and I admit to having a soft spot for Watford because of the family history. But, if the talent is close, I think Brooks needs to be priority number one. Not only would he help with instate people, we would be taking him away from Izzo. Hoosier Guy, IUBBFan1970 and Iugradman 3 Quote
Hoosier Guy Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 4 minutes ago, cthomas said: Hard to tell how they will be once they get to college and I admit to having a soft spot for Watford because of the family history. But, if the talent is close, I think Brooks needs to be priority number one. Not only would he help with instate people, we would be taking him away from Izzo. Absolutely. I want both Brooks and Watford. But if it’s one or the other, I want Brooks. He’s in-state and highly touted. Those guys should always be most important Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 Absolutely. I want both Brooks and Watford. But if it’s one or the other, I want Brooks. He’s in-state and highly touted. Those guys should always be most importantIf we are lucky enough to get either, I'm happy. Easily could be Brooks to MSU and Watford to UK or Alabama. I'm not holding my breath. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app ALASKA HOOSIER and IUsafety 2 Quote
Hoosierfan2017 Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 I want Matthew Hurt. If we could only have one recruit from that class he's the one for me. HoosierDYT 1 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 I want Matthew Hurt. If we could only have one recruit from that class he's the one for me. 100%.1a Hurt1b Anthony2a Watford2b Brooks3 TJDNot sure what guys we realistically have a chance with but getting 2 of these 5 would be fantastic. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app BtownBanner6, Hoosierfan2017, HoosierDYT and 1 other 4 Quote
Hoosier Guy Posted December 22, 2017 Posted December 22, 2017 3 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said: 100%. 1a Hurt 1b Anthony 2a Watford 2b Brooks 3 TJD Not sure what guys we realistically have a chance with but getting 2 of these 5 would be fantastic. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app A snowball would have to land in hell for IU to miss TJD. So there’s one right there. No way IU misses on all of the other four. I think Cole Anthony is a long shot. However, the remaining three are realistic Quote
HooHooHoo22 Posted December 23, 2017 Posted December 23, 2017 A snowball would have to land in hell for IU to miss TJD. So there’s one right there. No way IU misses on all of the other four. I think Cole Anthony is a long shot. However, the remaining three are realisticI honestly don’t think TJD is a for sure thing like some people make it out to be. I’d love to have him, yeah he visits a lot but things are just starting to heat up with him Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Iugradman 1 Quote
Hoosier Guy Posted December 23, 2017 Posted December 23, 2017 8 minutes ago, HooHooHoo22 said: I honestly don’t think TJD is a for sure thing like some people make it out to be. I’d love to have him, yeah he visits a lot but things are just starting to heat up with him Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Anything is possible. But I would be shocked if IU doesn’t get TJD ALASKA HOOSIER 1 Quote
GloryDays Posted December 23, 2017 Posted December 23, 2017 Anything is possible. But I would be shocked if IU doesn’t get TJD From a needs perspective TJD is #1 in my view.Hes everything DeRon Davis isn't,athletic and quick off his feet with great defensive instints. Brooks is not a banger by any means and from what I've seen the national guys have their rankings out of skew.Sent from my LGL41C using BtownBanners mobile app ALASKA HOOSIER, mdn82 and Iugradman 3 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted December 23, 2017 Posted December 23, 2017 From a needs perspective TJD is #1 in my view.Hes everything DeRon Davis isn't,athletic and quick off his feet with great defensive instints. Brooks is not a banger by any means and from what I've seen the national guys have their rankings out of skew.Sent from my LGL41C using BtownBanners mobile appAgree with TJD being a position of high need. TJD is ranked very highly as well. Brooks is ranked adequately. He needs to improve in areas but that New Albany game isn't Brooks normally. To me Hurt would be 1. TJD is the more likely guy in that spot.Then I look at Watford or Brooks for the other position. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app GloryDays and ALASKA HOOSIER 2 Quote
mdn82 Posted December 23, 2017 Posted December 23, 2017 From a needs perspective TJD is #1 in my view.Hes everything DeRon Davis isn't,athletic and quick off his feet with great defensive instints. Brooks is not a banger by any means and from what I've seen the national guys have their rankings out of skew.Sent from my LGL41C using BtownBanners mobile appAgreed. CAM is defense to offense. He is salivating at the thought of having TJD anchor his defense imo.Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app GloryDays and ALASKA HOOSIER 2 Quote
GloryDays Posted December 23, 2017 Posted December 23, 2017 Agree with TJD being a position of high need. TJD is ranked very highly as well. Brooks is ranked adequately. He needs to improve in areas but that New Albany game isn't Brooks normally. To me Hurt would be 1. TJD is the more likely guy in that spot. Then I look at Watford or Brooks for the other position. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Hurt is probably the best of the bunch but really don't see us getting him with the big dogs all over him. Sent from my LGL41C using BtownBanners mobile app WayneFleekHoosier, ALASKA HOOSIER and IUsafety 3 Quote
Popular Post Bowhunter Posted December 23, 2017 Popular Post Posted December 23, 2017 9 hours ago, Hoosier Guy said: Anything is possible. But I would be shocked if IU doesn’t get TJD Is that like Billy Donovan, Darius Garland, Romeo Langford shocked ? MikeRoberts, Brass Cannon, HooHooHoo22 and 10 others 13 Quote
Class of '66 Old Fart Posted December 23, 2017 Posted December 23, 2017 In the consolation game of the City of Palms Classic, Mountain Brook lost to Ranney 64-62 on the shot in the second vid clip. In the first clip, Mountain Brook had just taken the lead 62-61 with 1.6 seconds left. Trendon had 24 pts. and 20 pts. for Mountain Brook. WayneFleekHoosier, GloryDays, HoosierAloha and 1 other 4 Quote
muckraker Posted December 24, 2017 Posted December 24, 2017 That was kind of like "the un-wat shot." ALASKA HOOSIER 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.