Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Agree to disagree. Needed more time. His defensive length changed things. Grumpy Cronin not knowing what to do with him. Free throw shooting is a liability.  But the vision was there. Need more time and just a little confidence. But even if he just patrolled the paint, he’d meet his worth. Anything else is extra. 

So let's play a little comparison game! 

Both of these players are 7'4", both played for a top 25 power five team, and I'm gonna list both of their stat lines for their second year of college hoops:

Player 'A'

  • 12.9 mpg, 5.5 ppg on .646 fg% and .627 ft%, 3.0 rpg, 1.2 bpg.

Player 'B'

  • 13.1 mpg, 6.4 ppg on .590 fg% and .577 ft%, 4.0 rpg, 1.6 bpg.

 

Who do you like? Pretty identical if the quality of competition is identical?

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

So let's play a little comparison game! 

Both of these players are 7'4", both played for a top 25 power five team, and I'm gonna list both of their stat lines for their second year of college hoops:

Player 'A'

  • 12.9 mpg, 5.5 ppg on .646 fg% and .627 ft%, 3.0 rpg, 1.2 bpg.

Player 'B'

  • 13.1 mpg, 6.4 ppg on .590 fg% and .577 ft%, 4.0 rpg, 1.6 bpg.

 

Who do you like? Pretty identical if the quality of competition is identical?

 

I know Player B is Mara. Is A Jacobsen at Purdue? If so, I like his potential. I would never spend $3+ million on him in the portal though. 

Posted
1 minute ago, AH1971 said:

I thought you're whole schtick was overpaying for proven production? How on Earth does that fit the timeline for Mara and Johnson here? 

I don’t have a schtick. 
 

Yes, I think Indiana has put itself in a position that we need to overpay. Sadly, but surely. 
 

But ultimately it’s to have enough money to get the talent you identify and win the battles for the guys you want. Identify a guy, then have the resources to get that guy. Thats the dream scenario.

I also know you can’t have the #1 guy at every position.  But you need guys that man for man can compete at that type of level at each position. 
 

I also think Indiana needs some off season juice.  For the fans, for the recruits, for the media, for the basketball world. Gonna have to spend to create that because we didn’t do it organically like Michigan last year, Iowa this year, etc

Posted
Just now, AH1971 said:

I know Player B is Mara. Is A Jacobsen at Purdue? If so, I like his potential. I would never spend $3+ million on him in the portal though. 

Yuppers!

Now who has been gushing about Daniel Jacobsen's potential lately?

Dusty May saw the potential in Mara, but that evaluation wasn't a given.

Posted
4 minutes ago, IU5355 said:

Does anyone know how much NIL we actually have for basketball?

I saw it floating on X that we have around 12 million, which is concerning.

I saw 12 million and that we were T5

Posted
1 minute ago, Stuhoo said:

Yuppers!

Now who has been gushing about Daniel Jacobsen's potential lately?

Dusty May saw the potential in Mara, but that evaluation wasn't a given.

 

1 minute ago, Stuhoo said:

Yuppers!

Now who has been gushing about Daniel Jacobsen's potential lately?

Dusty May saw the potential in Mara, but that evaluation wasn't a given.

Purdue players don’t transfer but I do like Jacobsen quite a bit. I’ll go on record there. He isn’t Edey.  But he can be really good. The injury set him back a little. But if we had 3 bigs I’d be happy for him to be in the rotation. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

I don’t have a schtick. 
 

Yes, I think Indiana has put itself in a position that we need to overpay. Sadly, but surely. 
 

But ultimately it’s to have enough money to get the talent you identify and win the battles for the guys you want. Identify a guy, then have the resources to get that guy. Thats the dream scenario.

I also know you can’t have the #1 guy at every position.  But you need guys that man for man can compete at that type of level at each position. 
 

I also think Indiana needs some off season juice.  For the fans, for the recruits, for the media, for the basketball world. Gonna have to spend to create that because we didn’t do it organically like Michigan last year, Iowa this year, etc

IU had the money to beat out UK for Wilkerson. Had the money for Bailey to beat out UNC, Texas, and a few other suitors. Conerway had a ton of SEC offers. DeVries wasn't cheap. IU has the money to spend, but with the exception of Wilkerson, the wrong guys were identified. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, IU5355 said:

Does anyone know how much NIL we actually have for basketball?

I saw it floating on X that we have around 12 million, which is concerning.

If it's $12M that is pretty good -- up about 20% from last season.  Especially for a program that's done diddly poo for a decade.

If we can't put together a solid team with that much money we're toast no matter how much we spend.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Jeff Flabjohns said:

I too would like Jacobsen’s potential if coached by Dusty May

A different and better way of saying it:

I would like Jacobsen's potential better if Dusty May identified him as someone he thinks is worth developing.

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, CSP said:

I saw 12 million and that we were T5

Old numbers. 12 million would have put us top 5 a year ago.  Indiana always a year behind. We will find out in the portal and be shocked because all these other schools have so much money. Then we will wonder how our top 10 spent roster isn’t has good as others. It’s because the numbers are not public. Michigan absolutey outspent us last year. But the media puts them at 8-9 and us at 10.  I don’t buy that for a second. 8 or 9’before Yaxel?  Maybe.

Edited by WayneFleekHoosier
Posted
1 minute ago, AH1971 said:

IU had the money to beat out UK for Wilkerson. Had the money for Bailey to beat out UNC, Texas, and a few other suitors. Conerway had a ton of SEC offers. DeVries wasn't cheap. IU has the money to spend, but with the exception of Wilkerson, the wrong guys were identified. 

Sam Alexis was also properly identified; he would have been a pretty good 15-20 minute per game big if Bailey's failures hadn't necessitated him starting.

Posted
1 minute ago, Pagoda said:

If it's $12M that is pretty good -- up about 20% from last season.  Especially for a program that's done diddly poo for a decade.

If we can't put together a solid team with that much money we're toast no matter how much we spend.

Thanks I have convinced myself that 12 million is getting passed pretty significantly. Based on nothing other than fear lol. 

 

Posted
25 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Maybe but he made that team USA roster, so it wasn’t only Dusty and I that saw the vision.

He made it as an 18 year old and couldn’t get starters minutes at Illinois. 
 

Daniel Jacobsen made it and couldn’t start at Purdue. Keen eye there

Posted
4 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Old numbers. 12 million would have put us top 5 a year ago.  Indiana always a year behind. We will find out in the portal and be shocked because all these other schools have so much money. Then we will wonder how are top 10 spent roster isn’t has good as others. It’s because the numbers are public. Michigan absolutey outspent us last year. But the media puts them at 8-9 and us at 10.  I don’t buy that for a second. 8 or 9’before Yaxel?  Maybe.

It was close

Yaxel ~$5mil

Johnson/Mara/Cadeau all probably around $1 mil a piece

retention of Tschetter, Burnett (starter), Gayle (6th man) + two freshman Cason/McKenney collectively in the $1.5-$2mil range. So you're looking at around $9-10mil for Michigan compared to IU's ~$10mil. It's close. Michigan got way more out of their secondary and rotational pieces than IU. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Old numbers. 12 million would have put us top 5 a year ago.  Indiana always a year behind. We will find out in the portal and be shocked because all these other schools have so much money. Then we will wonder how are top 10 spent roster isn’t has good as others. It’s because the numbers are public. Michigan absolutey outspent us last year. But the media puts them at 8-9 and us at 10.  I don’t buy that for a second. 8 or 9’before Yaxel?  Maybe.

Listen... I just posted what I literally saw YESTERDAY. Take your Eror **** somewhere else. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...