RaceToTheTop Posted March 14, 2025 Posted March 14, 2025 4 hours ago, Uspshoosier said: Top 2 NET teams that don’t make the tourney from each of those conferences That would be Ohio state and northwestern in the big ten unless something strange happens. Northwestern passed IU yesterday, likely when Oregon ballooned the lead late. As I mentioned, Collins said northwestern would not accept an nit or crown bid so we’ll see what contractually obligated means. lillurk 1 Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted March 14, 2025 Posted March 14, 2025 Surprinsingly, in the 55 brackets posted on Bracketmatrix today, IU is in the tourney in 47 of them. xavier makes it in 28. North Carolina in 43. Texas in 40 boist state in 12 line of thinking among brackets is 3 of the 5 are in. San Diego state also misses in 5 brackets. lillurk 1 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 14, 2025 Author Posted March 14, 2025 Worth keeping in mind Lunardi works for espn which has tv rights to Acc and sec. I’m not shocked he moved both Texas and UNC in the field after yesterday. Other bracketologist that have a better track record still have IU ahead of them. Going to be close hoopsta007, Shooter, HoosierFan1994 and 3 others 6 Quote
hoopsta007 Posted March 14, 2025 Posted March 14, 2025 3 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said: Worth keeping in mind Lunardi works for espn which has tv rights to Acc and sec. I’m not shocked he moved both Texas and UNC in the field after yesterday. Other bracketologist that have a better track record still have IU ahead of them. Going to be close Good point. The same people tried to edge IU out of the CFP lillurk, Uspshoosier and tkbbn 3 Quote
LIHoosier Posted March 14, 2025 Posted March 14, 2025 4 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said: Worth keeping in mind Lunardi works for espn which has tv rights to Acc and sec. I’m not shocked he moved both Texas and UNC in the field after yesterday. Other bracketologist that have a better track record still have IU ahead of them. Going to be close You mean Heather 'Revoke Her Degree' Dinich Morrie Lunardi has a conflict of interest? Do tell. Uspshoosier 1 Quote
realTomCrean Posted March 14, 2025 Posted March 14, 2025 https://x.com/evanmiya/status/1900638065934192646?s=46&t=KBMjZuJJTG50JspPvw-4aA lillurk 1 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 14, 2025 Author Posted March 14, 2025 IU fake beat Tennessee on the road and Texas lost on a neutral floor to Tennessee therefore IU over Texas Jeff Flabjohns, hoopsta007, lillurk and 2 others 4 1 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 14, 2025 Author Posted March 14, 2025 If Texas gets in they will have a record of 12-15 against the top 3 Quads. No team has gotten an at-large with a losing record against the top 3 Quads. I think they might sneak it though Quote
hoopsta007 Posted March 14, 2025 Posted March 14, 2025 I know it isn’t a head to head comparison or necessarily what the committee focuses on but IU vs Texas: We have better record in common games, Texas loss to OSU and South Carolina Texas worst loss - South Carolina IU has the best win - at Michigan State Texas seems like it should be closer to Ohio St than above IU lillurk 1 Quote
Shooter Posted March 14, 2025 Posted March 14, 2025 Consensus from Bracket Matrix seems to be 6 teams for 4 spots, currently in this order (highest to lowest chance): San Diego St, Indiana, UNC, Texas, Xavier, Boise St. Any bid thief would take away one of the 4 available spots. UNC and Boise St have opportunities to help themselves tonight. lillurk 1 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 14, 2025 Author Posted March 14, 2025 27 minutes ago, hoopsta007 said: know it isn’t a head to head comparison or necessarily what the committee focuses on but IU vs Texas: Texas has 7 Q1 wins and IU has 4. Arguments for each on which should be above one or the other. Will come down to what the committee decide is most important. Ius non con sos is better hoopsta007 and lillurk 2 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 14, 2025 Author Posted March 14, 2025 2 hours ago, Uspshoosier said: If Texas gets in they will have a record of 12-15 against the top 3 Quads. No team has gotten an at-large with a losing record against the top 3 Quads. I think they might sneak it though https://x.com/madeformarch/status/1900673663109607632?s=46 i stand corrected. Only 5 teams have and none that were more then 1 game under .500 RaceToTheTop and lillurk 2 Quote
Ryno6284 Posted March 14, 2025 Posted March 14, 2025 4 hours ago, RaceToTheTop said: That would be Ohio state and northwestern in the big ten unless something strange happens. Northwestern passed IU yesterday, likely when Oregon ballooned the lead late. As I mentioned, Collins said northwestern would not accept an nit or crown bid so we’ll see what contractually obligated means. Why wouldn't he want to play more games? Hmmm Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted March 14, 2025 Posted March 14, 2025 @Uspshoosier am I wrong in thinking that San Diego state is not a lock? 20-9 after you remove the d2 game, net 52, 8 wins against quad 4, just 3 in quad 1 and 2 quad 2 and 1 quad 3 loss. lillurk 1 Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted March 14, 2025 Posted March 14, 2025 Lunardi did what @Uspshoosiersaid he would….switched IU to second out instead of first despite no new game results that would have affected it. What I also don’t understand is he had IU two spots ahead of Xavier, both lost q1 games and now Xavier is two spots ahead of iu lillurk and Shooter 2 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 15, 2025 Author Posted March 15, 2025 10 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said: @Uspshoosier am I wrong in thinking that San Diego state is not a lock? 20-9 after you remove the d2 game, net 52, 8 wins against quad 4, just 3 in quad 1 and 2 quad 2 and 1 quad 3 loss. They are squarely on the bubble. Committee wasn’t kind to the MWC last year. lillurk, Jeff Flabjohns and RaceToTheTop 3 Quote
Jeff Flabjohns Posted March 15, 2025 Posted March 15, 2025 2 hours ago, Uspshoosier said: IU fake beat Tennessee on the road and Texas lost on a neutral floor to Tennessee therefore IU over Texas How good would a win over Maryland look on the resume right now? Still can’t believe how we bungled that finish. Uspshoosier, lillurk and tkbbn 3 Quote
Jeff Flabjohns Posted March 15, 2025 Posted March 15, 2025 UNC getting squashed is good. WayneFleekHoosier 1 Quote
OliviaPope40 Posted March 15, 2025 Posted March 15, 2025 11 minutes ago, DoctorP said: UNC getting squashed is good. Down 22 right now. Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 15, 2025 Author Posted March 15, 2025 1 hour ago, Uspshoosier said: https://x.com/madeformarch/status/1900673663109607632?s=46 i stand corrected. Only 5 teams have and none that were more then 1 game under .500 On team with 7 Q1 wins have been left out so either way Texas will be doing something no one has done. Interested in how it plays out Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.