Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

MartintheMopMan

#5 Indiana v. #243 Liberty... Mutual? Post-game thread

Recommended Posts

I still think 3 or so of the bottom of the barrel games need to be moved up to "near sure win" games.

Liberty, Miss Valley State and SIUE should be upgraded to Indiana State type teams.  There is a reason we won the Big Ten and got a 5 seed last year.  The team is not motivated by these games and it hurts us with the committee. 


The loss to two sub 100 teams in Maui hurt a great deal in seeding as well. If we had our top end games (KU, UNC, UL, Butler), switched 5 of the 250+ games to 100-200, and a few of the 300+ games to 200-250 games we would have a very good OOC SOS and be positioned nicely for a top 4 seed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

The upsides I see is that Crean gets more time to rest starters for the big ten season. As well as try out lineups and give young players more PT. 

I also understand a cupcake at finals time so the boys can concentrate on the book work. Unlike teams like UK--we want our players to be real student-athletes!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, DChoosier said:

I still think 3 or so of the bottom of the barrel games need to be moved up to "near sure win" games.

Liberty, Miss Valley State and SIUE should be upgraded to Indiana State type teams.  There is a reason we won the Big Ten and got a 5 seed last year.  The team is not motivated by these games and it hurts us with the committee. 

A lot of that was do to us losing all our quality non conference games last year as well as dropping the ball in the BTT. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, IUsafety said:

Three guys from Huntington Prep were at the game along with another player. Couldn't tell who he was but some people around me thought it might have been Robert Phinisee. Can't confirm that though.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Anybody got any more news on this? We need to pull a recruiting rabbit out of the hat if you know what I mean!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A lot of that was do to us losing all our quality non conference games last year as well as dropping the ball in the BTT. 


Losing in the first round of the Maui Invite hurt us two fold. An L against a bad team and giving us an 200+ opponent in St. John's as opposed to a top 100 Vandy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

A lot of that was do to us losing all our quality non conference games last year as well as dropping the ball in the BTT. 

Yes, I agree. Last year Hawaii in particular was a RPI disaster.

That being said, I still think we should not be playing 300+ teams.  Not looking for a big overhaul but moving three 300 type teams to 100-150 teams would be good for our RPI, team and fans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The upsides I see is that Crean gets more time to rest starters for the big ten season. As well as try out lineups and give young players more PT. 


The thing is he does not rest the top guys. Priller got in with what 2 mins to go? He will run with the top 7-8 guys up to about 2 -3 minutes to go then maybe take them out. Too many games we are up 25+ with under 5 to go and all the starters can be still out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I still think 3 or so of the bottom of the barrel games need to be moved up to "near sure win" games.

Liberty, Miss Valley State and SIUE should be upgraded to Indiana State type teams.  There is a reason we won the Big Ten and got a 5 seed last year.  The team is not motivated by these games and it hurts us with the committee. 


The reason we got a 5 seed is because we lost to unlv and wake forest in Maui. Those 2 teams got worse and both ended up with a rpi in the high 130's. you are not going to get a high seed with multiple +100 rpi losses


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 8bucks said:


The thing is he does not rest the top guys. Priller got in with what 2 mins to go? He will run with the top 7-8 guys up to about 2 -3 minutes to go then maybe take them out. Too many games we are up 25+ with under 5 to go and all the starters can be still out there.

Our starters have averaged about 24 minutes these last 2 games. That's enough to keep them sharp without wearing them down 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Our starters have averaged about 24 minutes these last 2 games. That's enough to keep them sharp without wearing them down 



It is the pointless playing of them late in blowouts when they are bored and not playing sharp as it is that is the thing that bugs me. If we play the cupcakes let the subs get more time

ImageUploadedByBtownBanners1479615303.57

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, DChoosier said:

I still think 3 or so of the bottom of the barrel games need to be moved up to "near sure win" games.

Liberty, Miss Valley State and SIUE should be upgraded to Indiana State type teams.  There is a reason we won the Big Ten and got a 5 seed last year.  The team is not motivated by these games and it hurts us with the committee. 

You could do it without leaving the state. Ball State, Evansville, Indiana State, Fort Wayne, IUPUI, Toledo, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Ken is Wrong.

Many of our kids are young and still finding chemistry. They can handle 25 min a game.

It's the 2-3 hour practices that worry me more.

Crean has admitted to handling practice times better recently, particularly last year.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

I think Ken is Wrong.

Many of our kids are young and still finding chemistry. They can handle 25 min a game.

It's the 2-3 hour practices that worry me more.

Crean has admitted to handling practice times better recently, particularly last year.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

Precisely.  Crean only gets a certain amount of time per week with the players per NCAA rules, so he might as well use games as practice time if he can.

The 2nd half of some of these games are essentially free 20-minute practices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×