Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
41 minutes ago, Joe DeLow said:


Alabama May have won, but they still didn’t belong. If you can’t win your own conference, let alone can’t win your own division, you shouldn’t have a chance to win the national title in CFB.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

That’s silly even the best teams have an off day. Or a ref blows a call. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Joe DeLow said:


In CFB that’s what it comes down to. Just 1 loss can ruin your season. Look at Wisconsin. They 100% out of the playoff conversation because of just one loss. You have to be damn near perfect. Alabama didn’t deserve getting in. You can use 20/20 hindsight all you want. But that doesn’t disprove they shouldn’t have gotten in. Same with Cuse a couple years back in basketball. May have made the Final Four but never belonged in the tourney in the first place. They just stole someone else’s chance because the name on the jersey.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Who should’ve been in over Alabama?

Posted
12 minutes ago, Joe DeLow said:


In CFB that’s what it comes down to. Just 1 loss can ruin your season. Look at Wisconsin. They 100% out of the playoff conversation because of just one loss. You have to be damn near perfect. Alabama didn’t deserve getting in. You can use 20/20 hindsight all you want. But that doesn’t disprove they shouldn’t have gotten in. Same with Cuse a couple years back in basketball. May have made the Final Four but never belonged in the tourney in the first place. They just stole someone else’s chance because the name on the jersey.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

So you are simultaneously complaining that the system is one way then saying too bad because the system is the opposite?

Posted
6 minutes ago, TheWatShot said:

Ohio State only got in both times because of the name on their jersey. It's not right, but it's how college athletics work.

Ohio State deserved the first appearance. Totally different with the second

Posted

Wonder if the trend of getting more dynamic passers rather than dynamic athletes at QB will continue in college. Bama made the switch, Clemson made the switch, ND made the switch (albeit only one game so far), and Miami made the switch. Not saying the running QB will be gone forever, but teams seem to be realizing having a dynamic passer means more

Posted
4 minutes ago, southsidehoosier said:

Clemson students rush the fieldemoji848.png


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

They did? Well beating that 2-3 zone is pretty impressive...

Posted

So if your son had waited his turn to be the starter and went 16-2 as a starter and got benched, you would want him to stay and forget any shot he has at playing next level.. come on now.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

"Backups" are a play away from being starters. I would tell my son to work his butt off and let the chips fall where they may. When my nephew complains about basketball or baseball I tell him the same thing.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...