Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

ccgeneral

2016-17 Basketball Schedule

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, X-Hoosier said:

We also sucked early on last year. Hopefully the returnees remember that.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app

It's like I told people, Bellarmine is no slouch.  Top D2 program every year, and incredible fundamentals and IQ to help keep the game close.  Now, IU sucked against them, but Bellarmine is a good team.  I get the pleasure of watching them because they play in the same conference as the university my wife works at.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's like I told people, Bellarmine is no slouch.  Top D2 program every year, and incredible fundamentals and IQ to help keep the game close.  Now, IU sucked against them, but Bellarmine is a good team.  I get the pleasure of watching them because they play in the same conference as the university my wife works at.  

That is fine. But beating them by 20+ should be expected.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Really disappointed in the bottom of this schedule.
The good: 3 teams in top 10
The bad: 7 teams in KenPom 273+
The ugly: 5 teams in KenPom 300+, 3 at 340+

Hopefully, that was just down years and some of those teams rise. If they don't we'll have a terrible OOC SOS again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It has little to do with the top end. There won't be many B1G teams that will play top teams like that. It's the bottom end. If there are a few more games in the 100-200 range, a few in the 201-300, and none in the 300+ range that's a top 20ish OOC SOS.

Adding 2 more games against top 25ish teams will only do so much for you when you have 7, SEVEN games against 273+ teams. That's laughable! Are we preparing to play teams like Rutgers and Minnesota by these terrible noncon opponents?

I guess it's just padding stats so when we go into conference play with an OOC SOS in the 8+ averaging 90 points a game with an average margin of victory of +25 it'll look good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It has little to do with the top end. There won't be many B1G teams that will play top teams like that. It's the bottom end. If there are a few more games in the 100-200 range, a few in the 201-300, and none in the 300+ range that's a top 20ish OOC SOS.

Adding 2 more games against top 25ish teams will only do so much for you when you have 7, SEVEN games against 273+ teams. That's laughable! Are we preparing to play teams like Rutgers and Minnesota by these terrible noncon opponents?

I guess it's just padding stats so when we go into conference play with an OOC SOS in the 8+ averaging 90 points a game with an average margin of victory of +25 it'll look good.


I don't care what other teams are doing. Indiana needs to do their own thing. Play 6-8 power conference teams and keep the 250+ teams to everyone else.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, X-Hoosier said:


I don't care what other teams are doing. Indiana needs to do their own thing. Play 6-8 power conference teams and keep the 250+ teams to everyone else.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app
 

You can't go overboard with the top end teams though or you wear the team out.  There is a bit of a balancing act, you need some easy wins but you need to be challenged too.  We need to trim the fat on our OOC schedules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You can't go overboard with the top end teams though or you wear the team out.  There is a bit of a balancing act, you need some easy wins but you need to be challenged too.  We need to trim the fat on our OOC schedules.


I didn't say 8 teams of Duke, Kentucky, Kansas, UNC, Zona, UCLA, Oregon, UConn, Louisville, Texas etc. I just said power conference. Even lower tier power conference teams will look better. Or look at teams in the Big East, MWC, or Gonzaga and BYU. Instead we are going to the SWAC and MEAC to fill our schedule.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't say 8 teams of Duke, Kentucky, Kansas, UNC, Zona, UCLA, Oregon, UConn, Louisville, Texas etc. I just said power conference. Even lower tier power conference teams will look better. Or look at teams in the Big East, MWC, or Gonzaga and BYU. Instead we are going to the SWAC and MEAC to fill our schedule.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using BtownBanners mobile app


Yeah, and his point still stands. You need tune up games against some inferior competition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've posted for several years now that we need the following

3-4 games against top 25 teams (home, neutral, or away)
2-3 games against solid mid-majors or low power conference top 100-150 games
3-5 games against 151-250
2 games max against 250+ teams

We should never have more than half our schedule against 250+ teams. I get that things change year to year but that's just terrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×